Just because someone is silent does not always mean they agree. There are various reasons for their silence, such as avoiding conflict, lack of interest in the issue, or uncertainty due to lack of knowledge. Furthermore, silence may also indicate hesitation or the need for deeper thoughts. It is too simplistic to regard silence as agreement. To reach true agreement, active engagement with the silent person is necessary. Misinterpretation of silence can lead to unfair judgments and misunderstandings. (78 words)
In this world, people are divided into those who own land and those who do not. Those don’t own land must pay extremely high prices to obtain it, and unless they purchase a house, whose price becomes unclear in a black box, they cannot secure a home for themselves. Therefore, most people end up renting houses from owners, but those who can't even afford to rent houses have no choice but to become homeless.
I feel that this must be a violation of the constitution in every respect, however, nobody seems to feel suspicious about the current situation where only those who have the power of money control everything. Even though people do have such suspicions, they think that it is difficult to change the politics controlled by the rich. For that reason, those who don’t own land or houses work so frantically that they could obtain them, despite the fact that it may take decades to pay off.
I think this way of ownership of houses is ridiculous.
The relationship between human emotions and facial expressions is more complicated than generally imagined. It is said that the face is the mirror of the mind; however, on the other hand, there is the term “poker face,” which reminds us that the face does not always reflect the mind. In fact, some studies suggest that changing one’s facial expression can affect one’s mind. If that is true, just lifting the corners of your mouth a little might give you a more positive mood.
I support the opinion that “the spread of artificial intelligence will impoverish human imagination.” This is because AI can instantly provide final answers to us by bypassing the intermediate thinking process, which deprives human beings of the opportunity to think about the basics by themselves and to learn through trial and error. Human imagination is considered to be inspired by the accumulation of fundamental knowledge and continuous efforts. If AI thinks on behalf of human beings, people will lose the opportunity to cultivate their own imagination and become prone to neglect effort, and, consequently, human imagination will be impoverished. (99 words)