April 13 , 2020 鈴置高史(방울두어 높 문,Takabu-mi Suzu-oki)
China celebrates WWII victory ,
President Park attends military parade 박 대통령, 중
2015/09/03
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_K2kM4GqwJA
The rise of white supremacy and its new face
2019/05/30
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnI9c4_xu8w
Subtitles-Settings-Subtitles ( 1 )-Automatic translation-Language
Koreans caught the title of "Victory Country"
――You hit the “western thick wall” here as well.
Takabu-mi Suzu-oki :
Chinese see through the bent mind of the Korean.
We will occasionally touch and shake it to separate the US and South Korea.
In September 2015, China held the 70th Anniversary of Anti-Japanese War Victory (Anti-Japanese Ceremony).
The highlight is the military parade at Tiananmen Square.
The purpose was to show that China has become comparable to the United States in military terms.
There was no western country that sent the head of state or a high-ranking official to the ceremony because the intention was too explicit.
However, South Korean President 朴槿恵(Park Geun-hye,박근혜) attended, ignoring the US warning.
Naturally, the US-Korea relationship deteriorated, and at the meeting after the US-Korea summit meeting held in Washington in October of the same year, President Barak Obama spoke in front of President 朴槿恵(Park Geun-hye,박근혜)she blamed Leave the USA (Obey to china 9).
(Chapter 2 of the “ US-Korea Alliance Disappearance ” “Diplomatic Suicide” began with the administration of 朴槿恵(Park Geun-hye,박근혜)”
CanGetRidOfTreatyBecausePeopleBecameStronger1
reference)
--The conservative Park Governor regime
Why did she make the mistake of being scolded by the US?
Takabu-miSuzu-oki:
It was caught by the name " 70th Anniversary of Anti-Japanese War Victory".
When the president participated in this, Korean people felt like they was recognized as a victorious country.
At that time, there were no Korean media, including conservatives, who opposed participation.
Conservative media in conservatives
“Country of victory” recognized throughout Korea
"White superiority" and US criticism
China has triggered even "Korean basketball strategy" and 『習近平(Xi Jinping.시진핑,习近平)virus (corona 19)』.
The Chinese Communist Party's English-language external advertising paper, Global Times ,
「Rise of US white supremacy portends new cold war or worse」
Posted.
As the headline "American White Superiority" shows, it depicts the world in a "Western vs. Eastern" confrontational composition.
The point is that the US "disturbs world peace," but at that time, it intentionally called "white superiority."
--Did the United States begin to advocate white superiority?
Takabu-mi Suzu-oki:
It's a complete structure. This article cites Stephen K. Bannon , a former aide of President Trump, as an example of "white dominance in the United States."
It is true that Mr Bannon blamed the Chinese Communist Party hard.
But nowhere in this article does it show evidence that it leads to "white superiority."
In this next paragraph, "White nationalists consider a country that adopts a different ideology an enemy.
The former enemy was the Soviet Union, but now it's China. "
・White nationalists believe in an extreme way that their ideology must be spread and accepted by others, and any country that adopts a different ideology is labeled an enemy.They also attempt to unite Americans by making up an enemy.This enemy was once the Soviet Union, and now it is China.
Many of the people of the Soviet Union were “white,” and it is not only “white” who view different ideologies.
It's a confused unreasonable when it comes to this point.
It feels like a reporter forced by my boss to write in the style of "white vs. Asian"-"Western vs. Oriental".
Already, the alliance is outdated
――Why do they publish such an irrational article?
Takabu-mi Suzu-oki :
The widespread recognition of "US VS China" is probably because it is not necessarily advantageous to China.
Certainly,『習近平(Xi Jinping.시진핑,习近平)virus (corona 19)』 the United States of deaths exceeded the number of official announcement of China.
The "Chinese method system" may be better.
But jealousy is also bought in a "country that worked well".
The first place, 『習近平(Xi Jinping.시진핑,习近平)virus (corona 19)』global epidemic is because we happened from the concealment of China.
Also, many people are wary if they are bluntly shown the composition of "US VS China".
For example, South Korea's maintenance, "『習近平(Xi Jinping.시진핑,习近平)virus (corona 19)』 "failed away from the United States, let's goto've done well the Chinese side" will rebound if said.
But wrap it in oblate
"The era of the Orient"
"The days when the West decides the world are over."
I think that many of them can be caught.
It seems that he was pleased to participate in China's anti-Japanese ceremonies, being caught by the title of “Victory Country”.
The Global Times are also throwing a second arrow.
The editorial I posted on April 1st
" Post-pandemic international relations could change for the better "
"『習近平(Xi Jinping.시진핑,习近平)virus (corona 19)』"" well-made that "wonder if there's Nante • After is finished."
When I twist my head and read, nothing happens,
"The alliance is no longer useful. Bring it together in China's dream of creating a community that shares the future of humanity."
The strict adherence to alliances as a dominate force in the international order is losing appeal.In the face of severe situations, the world will eventually turn to coordination and cooperation.
2.
China's vision of building a community with shared future for mankind is being better understood through the mutual help between China and countries like Japan, South Korea and Italy.
China is better at conciliation than the US
--What about the United States for the conciliation work that is being carried out by China?
Takabu-mi Suzu-oki :
Ambassador of Japan to Harry Harris contributed to Hankyoreh, a left-wing newspaper.
" Let's fight together against the corona virus, a common enemy of humanity "
Although it is a Korean version, English text is also included.
South Korea after having applause to respond to『習近平(Xi Jinping.시진핑,习近平)virus (corona 19)』 we emphasized the importance of the US-ROK alliance.
Now that Koreans are soaked in self-satisfaction, saying, "Korea is amazing!", The aim is to inform the gratitude of the alliance while flattering.
I think that's why he contributed to the anti-American-colored Hankyoreh.
Only three readers wrote in the article.
One of them agrees, "Ambassador, that's right."
The other two were strong re pulsions from the US, which demanded a significant increase in defense sharing costs.
"While saying it's a partner on the same boat, do you want to increase it five times?"
"We will only form alliances when we need them. What is the excessive demand for sharing costs?"
is.
It is an expression of anger towards the "US that controls Korea".
Although it is not possible to make a judgment based on these two books, it is hard to believe that the contribution of the ambassador has widely sympathized with Koreans, even from the small amount of writing.
It was hard to say that I wrote it after giving up on what Koreans think deeply in their hearts.
China is far better in this area than the United States.
Of course, since China and Korea have been in a relationship between 宗主国(suzerain state) and 属国(vassal state) for more than 1000 years, it is natural .