米国、「ロシアへの半導体輸出禁止」の例外となる32箇国を発表・・韓国は含まれず
The US announces 32 countries that are exceptions to the "semiconductor export ban to Russia" ... South Korea is not included
https://sincereleeblog.com/2022/02/28/nocount/
February 28, 2022 February 28, 2022 The future of the Moon Jae-in administration, the blog of his Sincerely, which is impossible in the neighboring country, Korea information 0
LeeJaemyungApologiContemptForUkrainiaPresident2
LeeJaemyungApologiContemptForUkrainiaPresident's
イ・ジェミョン“ウクライナ大統領さげすみは私の表現力不足のせい”謝罪2
イ・ジェミョン“ウクライナ大統領さげすみは私の表現力不足のせい”謝罪
ЛіДжем'онBибачиться3а3невагуAоNрезидентівУкраїн2
ЛіДжем'онBибачиться3а3невагуAоNрезидентівУкраїн
文在寅事実上、対ロシア制裁に反対表明, ウクライナ侵攻で制裁への参加
MoonEffectivelyOposeSanctionAgainRussiaButAtJoin
韓国大統領府「対ロシア制裁に同調するとは言ったが、韓国が制裁するとは言ってない」
韓国大統領府「対ロシア制裁に同調するとは言ったが、韓国が制裁するとは言ってない」2
NoSayS-KoreaWillSanctionWouldBeRussiaSanction1
NoSayS-KoreaWillSanctionWouldBeRussiaSanction2
米国専門家たち「韓国は、事実上、ロシアへの制裁そのものを拒否した」
S-KoreaEffectivelyejectedSanctionRussiaItself
KoreaNewspaperSituationUkraineLargelyResponsAbe1
KoreaNewspaperSituationUkraineLargelyResponsAbe2
KoreaRemovParticipatingPartnerUSsanctionRussia1
KoreaRemovParticipatingPartnerUSsanctionRussia2
US, Russia sanctions participation partner 32 countries announced ... South Korea removed
米国、ロシアへの制裁の参加パートナー３２カ国発表…韓国は外された
https://japanese.joins.com/JArticle/288255
Ⓒ JoongAng Ilbo / JoongAng Ilbo Japanese version 2022.02.28 06:43
hea ***** |
There are really only enemies around Japan.
Russia, of course, China, North Korea, South Korea, all support or tolerate Russia.
If anything, there are forces in Japan that are trying to affirm Russia's actions.
Hoping for peace is not the same as being indifferent to the military.
I feel that it is time for Japan to seriously review its security thinking.
Reply 158
Empathy / 54369
Opposition / 1795
ghk ***** |
There are many comments that Japan should also be equipped with nuclear weapons because the possibility of a military invasion in Japan is not zero due to the military invasion of Russia, but with the current Japanese ability, nuclear missiles will be available in a few months. It seems that you can do it.
However, what is currently considered as national defense is that missile defense seems to neutralize mochiron, cyber, and electromagnetic wave attacks, and "stand-off jammer advanced aircraft" to neutralize the enemy's command system and communication network with jamming function. Is being developed.
There is also a railgun development that can quickly launch an attack from a distance where there is little possibility of being counterattacked by the enemy. Since the railgun bullet does not have a built-in explosive charge, it can destroy the target with its own kinetic energy, and even if the size and weight of the bullet are small, it has the characteristic that it can exert its destructive power if it is shot at high speed. It is epoch-making that it can be done for a few tens of yen per shot.
It seems that the prototype is already made in the United States, but a small fusion reactor is needed because a large capacity power supply is required.
Empathy / 224
Opposition / 27
poc ***** |
When Russia launches a war of aggression on Japan like Ukraine this time, will the United States protect it when it says that it will carry out a nuclear attack on the countries that support Japan? I don't think so, especially with Biden.
There may be some people who say that the US-Japan Security Treaty, but when it comes to war, it doesn't matter. If Ukraine had nuclear weapons, I don't think it would have been possible to start an aggression war as easily as this time.
Given that there are nuclear-weapon states that are aiming for Japan in the immediate vicinity of Russia, China, and North Korea, it may be a good opportunity for Japan to seriously consider nuclear possession.
Empathy / 587
Opposite / 42
tak ***** |
Really peace is made up of diplomatic tactics.
The diplomatic tactics have not only economic but also military aspects.
And it is a result that the response of each country including the United States and Russia clearly shows that if they have nuclear weapons, they will not be at least a fierce battlefield like Okinawa during World War II.
Russia's sin of throwing a big stone at the pros and cons of possessing a nuclear weapon is very heavy.
Empathy / 286
Opposite / 19
aoz ***** |
The surroundings of Japan are full of targets! Still, there are many people who believe in the delusion of exclusive defense.
Peace is something that you win on your own and cannot be left to others.
Europe and the United States support us, but they are geographically separated, and dispatching troops in an emergency is slow!
The first step is to have a missile that can carry a nuclear weapon.
It's okay if you don't know if there is a nucleus. Possibility becomes a deterrent!
The Self-Defense Forces are strong, and there will be many who will fight in the event of an emergency, but it is best if the other party is scared and does not touch!
Empathy / 134
Opposite / 19
ghk***** |
Mr.awt ***** Of course, it's technical.
In Japan today, there are three non-nuclear principles, so you can't make or use nuclear bombs.
However, it is certain that some American experts have said that Japan should have a nuclear weapon.
However, it seems that the Japanese government and the Self-Defense Forces are not thinking that way, but are proceeding with development in the seal domain.
At the time of the 2014 invasion of Crimea, cyber and electromagnetic wave attacks may have been used by Russia, and Mr. Onodera, the defense minister at the time, was concerned, and China also got it in 2015. It seems that Japan has also decided to develop shields specializing in (electronic warfare) such as electronic attack, electronic protection, and electronic warfare support.
In anticipation of such electronic warfare, the Trump administration was planning to set up a US military base for electronic warfare in the Senkaku Islands as a "multi-domain operation", but it has flowed as it was after that.
8 empathy / 3
Opposite / 5
tak ***** |
It is the lifeline for the United States to fuel relations between South Korea and North Korea, and Japan and China. It is impossible for both Japan and South Korea to survive on their own.
In particular, the location in South Korea is the end of consistency once you get into Red, and if you do not have a certain relationship with Red, you are at risk of isolation in the unlikely event that you are desperate.
There may be some disagreements, but I have to think hard about where to work with Japan to survive.
If you are abandoned by the United States in an emergency, you have no choice but to stick to Red or desperately resist with the power of the Self-Defense Forces.
Empathy / 196
Opposite / 33
Y--<<>>--Y |
100 years ago I went to get it because I was afraid to fall into the hands of Russia and Qing.
After that, Manchuria became independent, and it became a war with China, eventually losing to the United States.
I regret the history and apologize, and even in the 21st century, I still can't get out of it
There is still a country that does such a terrible thing with the same logic.
I hope this will change the world order.
Russia becomes the subject of the enemy state clause, Japan returns to a normal country,
With normal military power and legislation to prevent such aggression,
Let's be prepared to not be attacked from anywhere.
Empathy / 3
Opposite / 2
qpc ***** |
It may be unscrupulous, but I hope that Russia's invasion of Ukraine will give the Article 9 believers a sense of the realism of the international community.
No matter how beautiful you say, you should not turn away from it because it is a part of diplomatic means including armed forces, and the international community is a non-allied country only if the troops and people of the parties concerned are fighting to protect the country themselves. Anyway, they will help you.
Empathy / 149
Opposition / 12
LaiDaiHan |
Sanctions should be given to South Korea, which is uncooperative with Russia's sanctions
Countries that are uncooperative with sanctions against Russia are effectively mediating routes to avoid sanctions.
Foreign currency has been brought into Russia in the flow of west → South Korea → Russia, and the sanctions effect has been reduced.
Russia is able to maintain a strong attitude because there are countries like South Korea that are uncooperative with sanctions against Russia.
Western countries should be encouraged to impose sanctions not only on Russia but also on Russia-supporting countries.
Empathy / 108
Opposite / 7
sum *****
I think so too.
It must be peaceful, but no innocent people should be sacrificed in the war ...
There are only dangerous countries around Japan ...
I think Japan should also consider protecting its own country during this period.
I agree. I thought that security should also be reviewed.
Empathy / 477
Opposition / 23
See more (148)
bhm ***** |
I think that the country that I really want to invade as a country is Japan rather than Ukraine.
Russia, China, North Korea, and South Korea will be tired of wanting to crush, and it's scary to think that the invaders would think that now is the time to prove the lack of power of the United States and the United Nations. I think that the people are on the verge of seriously thinking about how long Japan's peaceful mood will continue and whether it must have a core for defense.
Reply 105
Empathy / 29071
Opposition / 1901
rie***** |
It is hard to say in Japan that you should possess nuclear weapons, but insisting on peace and not having weapons means that Japan may be invaded by dying. Also, the reluctant spirit of peace may be praised, but it depends on the other party whether it is peaceful and persuasive or love wins. I think that it is because Japan is peaceful that it can be said that it does not have nuclear weapons because it is a nuclear-exposed country, considering the situation of its own country. Japan is safe because it prevents people from bringing in pistols, and everyone doesn't have to carry a gun, so I don't think if a war breaks out.
The dictatorship may be observing the abilities of each country in this case.
Empathy / 691
Opposition / 46
*****? |
> I think the country that I really want to invade is Japan rather than Ukraine.
Probably not.
Putin believes that the dissolution of the Soviet Union is a mistake and that Ukraine and Russia should be on earth. It seems that the idea is to regain the range of influence of the Warsaw Pact.
Besides that, Kyiv in Ukraine is of Russian origin, meaning that it will regain an important place, if not Jerusalem of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, and that it does not want to increase the territory of NATO. There is also an intention.
Japan is a strategic buffer zone with the enemy country, the United States, so if it is not hostile to Russia, the meaning of invading now may be weak.
However, China's ambition is to break through the first island chain including Taiwan early, pass through the second island chain including Japan, and divide it into the United States and the Pacific Ocean, so if it can invade, I would like to do it as soon as possible.
Empathy / 422
Opposition / 21
kiy ***** |
From Russia's point of view, Ukraine is a bridgehead to Eastern Europe and Central Europe, not a goal.
By holding Ukraine, it will be possible to intimidate Slovakia and Hungary, which border on the border.
Even if we make a full-scale entry into Japan, there is no future.
Logistics cannot keep up with the full-scale entry into the Pacific Ocean.
If annexed to Honshu, half of Russia's population would be Japanese.
You may want Hokkaido, but I don't think you want Honshu.
In Russia's consciousness, Russia is a European country, not Asia.
China would like to annex Japan and make a full-scale entry into the Pacific Ocean.
From the perspective of China, Japan has a population and area of about one province.
The population balance will not be upset by annexing Japan.
Empathy / 82
Opposite / 1
tri ***** |
There are sufficient merits for them to invade Japan, which surrounds Japan.
Why do you want Senkaku and Takeshima (다케시마 竹島) in the first place? Because I want a body of water. Northern territories too.
Assuming, if Japan is invaded, they will definitely rob them first. It is a mountain division of the economic zone.
I don't think that other countries, which are a little stubborn in the face of the crisis in Ukraine, will speak out loudly to the islands as large as the Senkaku Islands and Takeshima (다케 시마 竹島).
Further extensive invasion and damage would allow the airspace to be freed for their military.
It would be refreshing if Japan disappeared! I don't think there are no countries that think that.
I don't think I can be very relieved.
Empathy / 321
Opposition / 31
kae ***** |
The world sees that it is highly likely that Japan will not possess nuclear weapons.
The emperor's thoughts, the national character of Japan, the politics of asking for a complexion, and the United States will not allow it.
Do you really think that Japan can become a nuclear power? ??
Looking at the invasion of Ukraine, I think it would be better to have it in terms of defense, but I think it is absolutely impossible based on that.
It is impossible to do something at the level of total replacement of Japanese politicians. If you can do that, the turnout of the election is not so low. Unfortunately, Japan is a flower garden. This is also a reality that should be accepted.
If you really think about it seriously, you have to think about defense on the premise that you can't have a nuclear weapon, right?
If you can, please tell me concretely. I can't imagine a young child in Shibuya and Harajuku standing up with a gun.
I think it's more realistic to make China and Russia think that invasion is democracy and that people's will is dangerous. In that sense, I don't think demos are meaningless.
Empathy / 125
Opposite / 256
nis***** |
For the time being, Putin as an individual is relatively pro-Japanese.
Even when diplomacy with Abe, I think it's only when I'm at the top to get to know Russia. It was flickering. (I declined Japan)
Russia wants to solidify others rather than devote such strategies and forces to Japan. There is no reason to invade Japan just because the Northern Territories have not been returned.
The sea route is secured, and it will be more powerful here and there, so it should not be my desire.
The direction Japan should be wary of is not north anyway.
Empathy / 291
Opposite / 100
fuk ***** |
It's not that Japan doesn't have a sense of crisis, but I feel it's thin.
There is no country like Ukraine that can be an enemy, and there is a base in the United States, which is an ally.
It's within reach of the missile, but it doesn't actually shoot, right? Or something.
You can't get in a tank right away like Ukraine.
In this case, if we do not take the opportunity to seriously consider strengthening deterrence, it will be a defense that will be swayed by the trends of the United States forever.
Empathy / 280
Opposite / 22
One tatami mat |
After World War II, Japan was essentially a client state of the United States, but many Japanese people are unaware of it and are looking away.
The American first values are implanted so that the Japanese people do not bother.
Will the United States protect Japan and the Japanese as it protects itself when Japan is dying?
It is highly unlikely that a country that dropped the atomic bomb without hesitation and a country that did cruel acts that it did not consider to be the same human being would seriously protect Japan's territory and its people.
Only the Japanese can seriously protect Japan and the lives, bodies and property of the Japanese.
We are not calling for the use of force to counter the force. I would like all Japanese people to seriously think about themselves, their families, the familiar society related to them, and the future of Japan's national interests and descendants. And I want you to have your own thoughts, pay attention to politics, and throw your thoughts and opinions in elections.
Empathy / 74
Opposite / 5
guc ***** |
I don't know what is true, but if you compare it, Ukraine is the top priority. Putin seems to be aiming to regain control of the former Soviet era, but why Ukraine is very dangerous because the position of the Russian capital is extremely close to the border with the NATO Allied Powers. from. So it makes sense to want to prevent membership. In the case of Japan, what Russia is doing military exercises in the Northern Territories and in the waters near Japan is something like a check on Japan, but that something may be related to the United States. China really wants Japan. I wrote it in the Communist Party newspaper. However, it is also true that China maintains a relationship with Russia.
Empathy / 75
Opposition / 6
zzzz **** |
How much self-consciousness is ...
Japan without resources will not be a big problem If you hold down the Middle East first
Similarly for Italy, Germany, France and Spain in Europe.
Russia even thinks Japan is a model for socialism
There is a good balance between capitalism and social order, and there is a separation of church and state.
Japan needs to prepare to mediate between NATO and Russia in the future ...
A war between nuclear powers will never end with one being destroyed
War without winners Political power to prevent it is being tested
Empathy / 50
Opposite / 89
See more (95)
Daruma |
It is clear that Russia will be more tolerant if it does not stop in the early stages of this mistake.
Subsequent targets may be Hokkaido, attacking from the north. In order to get help at that time, I chose to participate in sanctions here.
You should feel a little more scared.
And of course China. The attitude towards Taiwan is very similar to Russia's attitude towards Ukraine.
I should be preparing to talk about the cause and attack.
The reaction of the international community this time is also a touchstone.
Japan must be aware that it will come to itself if it does not oppose it.
It became clear that South Korea was not an ally. America would think so too. GSOMIA must be reconsidered.
It's a pity that no member of parliament has cut into this issue.
Instead of just getting money and power, you should stand up and fight. If you can fight, I want to support you.
If you don't, you should quit.
Reply 24
Empathy / 14291
Opposite / 912
wood***** |
It should be considered that Russia's actions and aims include the invasion of Japan, but there is something to remember. It means that we need to get rid of a group of parliamentarians from China and South Korea. I think they are the ones who are willing to betray Japan. You can think that the locals who choose them are similar. In order to prevent the invasion of other countries, I think that domestic dangerous molecules should not be in the Diet.
Empathy / 260
Opposite / 14
LaiDaiHan |
Sanctions should be given to South Korea, which is uncooperative with Russia's sanctions
Countries that are uncooperative with sanctions against Russia are effectively mediating routes to avoid sanctions.
Foreign currency has been brought into Russia in the flow of west → South Korea → Russia, and the sanctions effect has been reduced.
Russia is able to maintain a strong attitude because there are countries like South Korea that are uncooperative with sanctions against Russia.
Western countries should be encouraged to impose sanctions not only on Russia but also on Russia-supporting countries.
Empathy / 85
Opposite / 2
ExDandT |
It was in Japan 80 years ago that I did "I understand it". Do you think you know that country?
And where are you really on your side when World War III happens?
You have to divide the power into two and three.
If you divide it into two, you can be an enemy country in the north, in the middle, in the south, and in Germany.
The scary thing is that when it's divided into three, the Middle East may be, and the euro may be subdivided.
Empathy / 37
Opposite / 10
cho ***** |
It has become clear that Russia is bringing troops to the front line by pretending to be exercises, and it is becoming a world where no unreasonable war can occur.
The pen is mightier than the sword, but now it's time to connect with the world with just one smartphone. The war was not a military force but a stop for people all over the world.
Empathy / 23
Opposite / 59
Dr. Slump |
This topic will be raised in the presidential election, but both attitudes are withheld.
It's easy for Japan, but Chai's attitude toward Russia also comes in, so the situation changes considerably with just one statement.
If you are not good at it, it will directly lead to energy problems.
Kishida commented that he was prepared for some boomerangs, but South Korea was too cautious.
That's why it was seen through by the United States.
Empathy / 223
Opposite / 3
Taiwan is an enemy country. |
You shouldn't put Taiwan and Ukraine together. The situation is different between Ukraine, which is clearly invaded, and Taiwan, which is clearly part of China.
Empathy / 3
Opposite / 120
** e **** n |
Let's change the constitution. Let's articulate the right of collective self-defense. Let's clarify the existence of the Self-Defense Forces.
Who was hitting Shinzo Abe who was doing his best?
At that time, if I had done it, I was ready.
Empathy / 305
Opposite / 24
Midranger |
I knew that the war had begun in this way. And the army went out of control.
It used to be oil, and now it can't support anything. The history is amazing.
Empathy / 6
Opposite / 2
tak ***** |
The situation is different between Korea, which is surrounded by the red team, and Japan, an island country.
South Korea is in a more dangerous location than Ukraine.
Empathy / 141
Opposition / 17
ysy ***** |
At least you shouldn't export semiconductors and semiconductor manufacturing-related products to South Korea.
Empathy / 122
Opposition / 6
See more (14)
asa ***** |
Isn't it unavoidable that South Korea's unclear attitude toward participation in sanctions while trying to put it together in Western countries can be regarded as support for Russia?
With all the enemies around the four northern islands, the Senkaku Islands, and Takeshima (다케시마 竹島), Article 9 alone cannot protect the land.
The US military is stationed there, but I think it is still necessary to strengthen the defense capabilities of our own country.
Just as Germany is considering increasing military spending, Japan should take this opportunity to strengthen its defense capabilities.
Because it takes time to strengthen, I want you to move immediately for the future.
Reply 22
Empathy / 6947
Opposite / 220
wat***** |
I'm worried that Japan has two military powers next to it.
South Korea has been criticized, but as a result, when I think about the people, I think I attacked the last minute.
If this war goes well, Russia will turn to sanctioned nations.
Of course, it can be imagined that it will affect nearby countries rather than distant countries.
Furthermore, considering that it is in line with China, it may be near that the Senkaku Islands will be taken in the near future.
Even if China comes to the unmanned Senkaku, the United States does not feel like moving.
Western sanctions and Asian sanctions are at completely different levels. I want the United States to think about that as well.
What happens when Japan is isolated from the ladder someday if it is in line with the United States?
Empathy / 0
Opposite / 1
wood ***** |
It should be considered that Russia's actions and aims include the invasion of Japan, but there is something to remember. It means that we need to get rid of a group of parliamentarians from China and South Korea. I think they are the ones who are willing to betray Japan. You can think that the locals who choose them are similar. In order to prevent the invasion of other countries, I think that domestic dangerous molecules should not be in the Diet.
Empathy / 125
Opposition / 6
mur ***** |
Alas, the Japanese people should be the first to change their consciousness before strengthening their defense capabilities.
If the aim is to strengthen the armament, will the current Japanese accept military service obediently? The answer is completely NO. If Japan goes to war, most of the people will flee the country and the remaining people will surrender without resistance. Postwar education has made the Japanese so disliked war. The only way to reform is to change at the education level.
Empathy / 54
Opposite / 7
Use of kid |
There is also an aspect that peace in Asia is maintained because South Korea and North Korea have such an ambiguous attitude.
When applying the Russian issue to China, if both buffer states openly say that they will give the United States and crush China, China is likely to go out of control.
The pro-American triangle alliance theory is also a dangerous idea.
If Japan is the final defense line = EU, France or Germany, but does not intervene in South Korea = does not expand to the east, the risk of war is reduced.
Empathy / 15
Opposite / 2
nao ***** |
> Isn't it unavoidable that South Korea's unclear attitude toward participation in sanctions can be regarded as support for Russia?
Yes, South Korea is a leftist government, and Japan is very scared to think what it would have been like during the Democratic Party of Japan.
Democratic nations are also unstable in a sense, as the direction of the nation changes greatly depending on the government.
Under the Republican administration, the United States would have responded quite differently, and Putin might not have done anything during the Trump administration in the first place.
Empathy / 12
Opposite / 16
ma_ ***** |
Since this war can only be regarded as another person's affairs, I think it is okay to establish a military service system.
When I write something like this, I get asked "Do you want to send your children and grandchildren to war?", But I would like to ask "Do you want to leave it to others in case of an emergency?"
Empathy / 32
Opposite / 8
hop ***** |
I think the people without money are closer to China. Especially young people who are said not to go to elections.
I think it's a layer that you can't understand until you open the lid. No, maybe I'm in the ice age.
Empathy / 7
Opposition / 39
Energy saving Kishida |
As of 2020, Japan is the ninth largest defense spender in the world.
Since it has increased more, it may have been ranked 5th recently.
Empathy / 10
Opposite / 32
ps2 ***** |
I'm not downplaying South Korea. It's just that the Korean side was cautious.
The South Korean Army is one of the top ten powers in the world, so it is not without its influence.
Empathy / 1
Opposite / 7
kwx ***** |
This is not something I could say very strongly because Japan was too late to make a decision.
Empathy / 5
Opposition / 73
See more (12)
fur***** |
With this invasion, I think China, North Korea, Russia, South Korea, etc. are focusing on the trends of the United States.
I can't think of Ukraine as Japan. I think I'm looking at the situation when Japan was blamed.
First, it became clear that the United States would not protect Japan. Her own interests are prioritized, and Japan's security is secondary.
I think China was almost certain that the United States wouldn't come to the table when it attacked Japan.
I am against war, against nuclear weapons and possession of weapons of mass destruction, but I feel that it is still necessary to discuss possession of nuclear weapons or possession of powerful weapons to replace them in order to protect our country. The beauty and Japanese reasoning do not apply to the attacking opponent. I feel that it is necessary to build self-defense measures to prevent attacks.
Reply 19
Empathy / 4101
Opposite / 284
got ***** |
We expect the United States to participate in the Japan-US alliance, but unfortunately, participation in the war requires the approval of the US Congress.
What's scary about this? It means that the interests of the United States take precedence over the alliance.
Constitutional amendment and possession of nuclear weapons should be carried out as soon as possible.
Reply 19
Empathy / 6126
Opposition / 279
pur ***** |
It seems that the United States cannot afford to spend time on diplomatic negotiations with a country that is hard to get hungry. ..
If you want to join, please make your own judgment and participate. ..
After all, it's not important. ..
Reply 25
Empathy / 7743
Opposite / 261
dad ***** |
This time, I could finally understand the attitude of the United States and Europe toward Russia's violence.
That is, if Japan is in the same situation as Ukraine, the United States will not seriously defend Japan.
I hope that the Ukrainian people can live with peace of mind as soon as possible, but I cannot help but feel that it is no wonder that this situation occurs in Japan at any time.
The Japanese people, who take it for granted in a peaceful world, should have finally realized that it is an illusion that the current peace is back-to-back with the crisis and that it is okay because the United States is behind it.
Looking at the map, there are many anti-Japanese countries around Japan, and especially China and North Korea are in a situation where it is safe to launch missiles at any time.
It's hard to focus on your own country, but if you think that your loved ones and parents may lose their lives, you have to think seriously about defense.
Reply 7
Empathy / 2187
Opposite / 118
roborobo |
If you really want world peace, it is difficult for Japan to have military spending and military power that surpasses the Chinese Communist Party and Russia at present!
It is realistic and efficient to have nuclear and advanced military technology as a deterrent.
However, Japan cannot currently have this kind of weapon (due to legal, opposition, anti-US, etc.)
How can Japan ensure safety, not Japan?
Would you like to create a military organization to protect member states when they are invaded, rather than having the latest weapons for each country?
Reply 35
Empathy / 3399
Opposite / 434
nan ***** |
Japan should also immediately embargo chip parts. It is powerless for missiles that are already equipped, but I think it will be a very powerful deterrent by stopping the emergency of chip parts that are essential for the reproduction of weapons. Japan has the technology that supports the world. By removing that support, the parties to the conflict can be hit. I want you to make more strategic use of Japanese technology and industry. In this case, there are no constitutional issues and no burden on the Self-Defense Forces. If the world moves in cooperation, only Japan will not receive a backlash. I want Japan to be aware of its strengths and act positively.
The actions of each country this time are becoming a scheme to counter Russia, which relies on force, in the economy. In addition, I would like you to add countermeasures in each country's technology and industry. If this succeeds, it will be possible to spread the recognition to the world that "a limited war by military power will not be dealt with." I think it will be a very effective lesson for the nations aiming for hegemony.
Empathy / 250
Opposite / 16
It's just yesterday morning, so it's a past entry, but on the 27th, US experts said, "Korea will not intervene in the Taiwan issue because North Korea is more important." "Leave security to another country." There was [there was an entry with such contentそんな内容のエントリーがありました] that showed a reaction such as "The country of Panashi refused its own sanctions."
The first image I received was "Korea is an ally of the United States, isn't it?"
Therefore, the title also starts with "What is the ally for?".
In fact, in President Byden's speech to the public on the 24th (local time), France, Germany, Italy and 27 EU countries, Japan, New Zealand, Australia, the United Kingdom, Canada, "Countries that participated in sanctions against Russia" Many other countries ”, but there was no South Korea.
Until then, President Moon Jae-in said, "If sanctions are imposed, the Korean economy will be adversely affected."
He does not impose his own sanctions, but it is said that President Biden's speech was the reason for the vague talk of participating in sanctions.
(What I say, it's a bad idea)
However, even so, South Korea was not included in this announcement.
This means that President Moon Jae-in said that he would "participate in sanctions" because it was Nokan or Nomun (Sentence) from the perspective of the United States.
As President Moon Jae-in and head of state, he showed off the worst coolness.
This is not the first time, though.
By the way, if some media wrote that "President Moon Jae-in reached out, but the United States did not hold that hand," it seems that it can be updated two or three times. I don't think it's true (laughs).
* Only one line is added ... A few hours after this article was published, South Korean President Moon Jae-in announced that he would impose his own sanctions to control the export of strategic supplies to Russia. The specific content and the reaction of the US side such as this have not been clarified yet *
