Korea, from the splendid "goal post shift"
Special Move "Victim Position"
Final is `` Weepful entreaties ''
2019/07/27
Subtitles-Settings-Subtitles ( 1 )-Automatic translation-Language
Is it due to recent corona shock and Wuhan pneumonia shock,
Stock prices fell every day,
Also, the Japanese government has finally
A measure equivalent to refusal of entry from China and South Korea was launched.
One of the issues that has completely hidden the shadow due to such confusion is
Japan's export control measures for South Korea and
This is a reaction that can be said to be anomalies in Korea.
In connection with this, yesterday, I found an article of interest in Korean media.
How to read this report
The Korean media, " Joong Ang Ilbo " (Japanese version)
This article was published.
「AlReasonForExportRestrictionResolveShouldRestor1
성윤모 장관 “일본주장한 수출규제 사유 모두 해소…원상회복 촉구”
韓国産業部長官,日本主張の輸出規制の理由すべて解消,原状回復すべき1」
(With 2020.03.06 10: 11 )
This is because Korea ’s Industry, Trade and Resources Manager
成允模（Song YunMo,송 윤모）
"The government will remove the reasons for Japanese export" regulations "
We have put a lot of effort into setting the conditions for prompt problem solving. ''
The Japanese government requested that the Japanese government repeal export restrictions.
The following is a summary of Mr. 成允模（Song YunMo,송 윤모）.
(However, some parts of the original text have no meaning,
The text has been modified on this website).
Over the past five months, South Korean export control authorities have held section-level meetings and director-level policy dialogues.
About export control laws, organizations, human resources, systems, etc.
(To the Japanese side) Explained enough
Through these meetings, dialogues, etc., the export control authorities of Korea and Japan
Fostered an understanding of both countries' export controls and built a good relationship of trust
Korea's catch-all regulations are working properly
Clarifies the legal basis for this,
Proposed amendments to the Foreign Trade Law to enhance the effectiveness of export controls are:
Ahead of parliament of today's National Assembly plenary session
As described later, export "regulation" is an erroneous description of export control appropriateness measures.
However, unfortunately, this remark by Mr. 成允模（Song YunMo,송 윤모） is
It is hard to say that Korea fully understands the situation.
However, at the same time, this statement,
You should see it as a kind of "Weepful entreaties".
Before thinking about this,
文在寅（Moon Jae-in,문재인） government of South Korea has caused it,
Among various unfriendly and irrational movements against Japan,
Focusing on "three points set" and related issues,
Let's consider those movements again.
Japan-Korea riot again looking back
"Three points set" which completely hidden shadow,
Basically, self-proclaimed former recruiter
"Applied worker from the Korean Peninsula"
The shadow of the recent
“武漢(Wuhan) virus (Corona 19, SARS-CoV-2) Shock” is
Three issues surrounding Japan-Korea relations
“Issues from the Korean Peninsula Applicant Workers ''
"Japan's export control measures for Korea and Korea",
"Japan-Korea GSOMIA destruction riot"-.
As I have already reported many times,
The issue of the “From Korean Peninsula Applicant Workers” problem was sharpened as a pending issue between Japan and South Korea.
On October 30 , 2018 , Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal (now Nippon Steel)
Korea's Supreme Court
Daepo-gu has ordered damages to "From Korean Peninsula Applicant Workers"
The so-called “From Korean Peninsula Applicant Workers” sentenced to me.
And it was created
by South Korea under 文在寅（Moon Jae-in,문재인）government,
For various concerns between Japan and Korea,
Many of them are "Applicants from the Korean Peninsula"
You can understand by focusing on the problem.
It is, in human terms,
"Korea does not respect international law, treaties and promises"
Is exhausted.
In the first place, "From Korean Peninsula Applicant Workers"
The problem itself has the following two problems.
(1) All past issues between Japan and Korea
The Japan-Korea Claims Agreement of 1965 was legally completely settled,
It is against international law to steam it later.
Japan Korea Claims Agreement
Agreement Between Japan and the Republic of Korea Concerning the Settlement of Problems in Regard to Property and Claims and Economic Cooperation
(2) Including " Issues from Korean Peninsula"
Many of the "history issues" themselves are from Korea (or malicious Japanese)
It's a lie, a fabrication.
What the Japanese government officially asserts is the point of (1)
However, in reality, the problem of (2) is also serious,
In fact,
"( Combat ) Comfort woman = Sex Slaves = Prostitute " issue,
It mean
" Between December 9, 1941 and August 15 , 1945 ,
Based on a formal decision made by the Japanese military, only 200,000 girls were kidnapped on the Korean Peninsula,
A lie that it was forcibly taken to the battlefield and used as a sexual slave ''
And the composition is exactly the same.
Comfort woman = Sex Slaves = Prostitute
And their surroundings are called "battlefield and sex"
In a way, it ’s a very easy to understand story of human rights abuses,
Continue to hurt Japan's honor and dignity in its ongoing form
On the other hand, the fund has been
South Korea extort take money from Japan in such a form.
In that sense, the issue of
Just Comfort Women ( Comfort woman = Sex Slaves = Prostitute )
It is aimed at the "recycled" problem,
You can say
But, "It is the Korean side that forged history in the first place."
Unless you confront the fact that
Comfort Woman ( Sex Slaves = Prostitute )
The "From Korean Peninsula Applicant Workers" problem will not be solved.
The Japanese government's response remained gentleman
However, on this website,
Although the Japanese government has critically pointed out that (2) is not mentioned much,
Regarding the point that (1) has been firmly asserted,
Conventional “diplomatic policy (immobilism pushover)”
I think that it is good to be highly evaluated as a break away from.
In particular, the Korean side has taken actions that trample on international law, treaties, and commitments.
Despite this, the Japanese government, on the other hand, is not on the same playing field as South Korea,
Only in accordance with international law, treaties and commitments,
He has been gentle and friendly, but resolute.
In this regard, we, the Japanese people, can be proud.
For example,
Two years ago, the Korean court ruled a total of three
"From Korean Peninsula Applicant Workers"
However, shortly thereafter, the Japanese government instructed the Korean government
He demanded that Korea violate international law violations as soon as possible.
When the South Korean government did not move, this time on January 9 last year,
Applying for "diplomatic consultation" as defined in Article 3 (1) of the Japan-Korea Claims Agreement,
With a little more than four months, he continued calling on the Korean government to consult.
That would be too long for the grace period.
However, the Korean government responded
Prime Minister 李洛淵（LeeNak-yeon,이낙연） of the time on May 15
The Government of Japan immediately went May 20 ,
Notice of referral to the Arbitration Committee under Article 3 (2) of the Japan-Korea Claims Agreement.
Furthermore, after the Korean government did not appoint an arbitrator in time,
On June 19 , notification of submission to third country arbitration under Article 3 (3) of the Japan-Korea Claims Agreement
And continued efforts to solve problems in accordance with the international treaty called the Japan-Korea Claims Agreement.
However, the Korean government, after all,
By July 18 , he ignored the necessary procedures for third country arbitration,
After all, the friendly and gentleman of the Japanese government over this issue
All efforts to solve the problem were trampled by Korea,
It is the appearance that the "results" have been made.
At present, the Japanese government states, "In case of unreasonable damage to Japanese companies,
Clarify the attitude of taking some countermeasures
But if you look at the Korean government's series of mess,
Even if the Japanese government decides to impose sanctions on South Korea over this issue,
At least the overwhelming majority of Japanese people will be convinced.
South Korea misinterprets export control measures as retaliation
Under these circumstances, the problem that came down in a completely different dimension,
The Japanese government announced on July 1, last year,
" Appropriate measures for export control to Korea ."
This is based on Article 48, Paragraph 1 of the Foreign Exchange Act, etc.
It will change the handling of export control of strategic goods to South Korea.
(1) Switching the export license etc. of some items such as hydrogen fluoride to individual approval,
(2) Korea is excluded from the “(former) White Country” for export control.
It consists of measures.
Regarding the reason for the Japanese government to take this export control measures,
It is becoming difficult to work on export control based on a relationship of trust with Korea
In addition, over export control related to Korea
"Inappropriate case" has occurred.
What does this “inappropriate case” mean?
The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry has not officially disclosed its contents until today
However, the Minister of Economy Trade and Industry 世耕弘成(Hiroshige Sekō) at that time held a press conference on August 8,
"At the same time, we will continue to conduct strict reviews on export license applications,
In order to avoid cases such as detour trade and unintended use ,
I want to deal with it strictly. ''
(* Processed by quoter)
In light of the fact that South Korea imported items from Japan,
There is a strong suspicion that they may have been diverted to "unintended use" and "detour trade".
There are various critics of this
"Did it flow to North Korea?"
"No, it must have flown to Iran."
Or `` On December 20 , 2018 ,
An Iranian small boat receives hydrogen fluoride from a Korean warship,
South Korea received oil in a barter. "
It seems that he is claiming to be.
(※ However, if I give my personal impression,
"Korean naval destroyer radiates fire control radar on PMS patrol aircraft
At the scene where the incident occurred,
In fact, there was a ship-to-ship cargo transfer between Korea and Iran. ''
There seems to be some difficulty with this theory ... )
Why export controls are not retaliation
Here is a little bit of aside from the main point.
The Japanese government's announcement on the measures to optimize export control to Korea
It is clear that there is no retaliation or economic sanctions for
the 『From Korean Peninsula Applicant Workers』issue.
First, we must not ignore the fact that the announcement was on July 1st.
At the same time, referral proceedings to third country arbitration were ongoing.
If taken as a countermeasure against
the 『From Korean Peninsula Applicant Workers』 problem
Then, at least when to announce
It's strange after July 19th .
Next, of the announced content,
For the "(old) White Country", or exclusion from the current "Group A"
Currently, South Korea is the second priority country for export control, after Group A.
Although included in "Group B" and the General Comprehensive License does not apply,
Special General Comprehensive Permits, etc., apply.
Items that have been switched to individual approval
Hydrogen fluoride, resist, fluorinated polyimide
Limited to 3 items (including transfer of technology for manufacturing as well as products)
But especially hydrogen fluoride (HS number 2811.11-000 )Exports to Korea amounted to only 7.5 billion yen throughout 2018 .
Exports of hydrogen fluoride to Korea are halved month-on-month both in value and volume
(From 2020/02/27 16: 00 on this website )Of course, since these three items were products used in the semiconductor industry, etc.,
In Korea, "Japan has embarked on economic retaliation through export" regulations. "
It is true that misunderstanding such as
(* In South Korea, export control measures are called "Strengthening export" regulations. "
Misunderstandings).
However, even after the export control measures were implemented,
Export of these items to Korea was temporarily delayed
However, at the moment export license has been issued,
For the resist of the three items,
The application of the "Specific Comprehensive Permit" was approved on December 20 , last year.
In other words, if the measures of the Japanese government were intended to be "economic sanctions,"
Qualitatively and quantitatively, they do not function as economic sanctions,
For this reason, these measures are purely
It is undoubtedly ascribed to "export control issues in Korea".