https://japan-indepth.jp/?p=46114
2019/6/4 Furumori Yoshihisa
(Journalist, Special Professor at Reitaku University)
Immorality of NHK Tiananmen case commentary2
Immorality of NHK Tiananmen case commentary1
Do We Pay NHK Is it necessary?
Recommendation 3176 Opposite 111
I can understand the standing position of NHK well
Recommendation 3114 Opposite 65
The same thing happens in Hong Kong some years later.
Recommendation 2112 Opposite 59
NHK is not a state-owned broadcaster, right?
So what if you think of it
"specific country (China, Korea, North Korea)
The powersat work behind the scenes by
A broadcaster that is not a Japanese government-owned broadcaster "
Will it be?
NHK reports is different from the facts
It's a mass media that reports "This is true".
I think that it is a really strange thing
that the coverage concerning a specific country is mostly the contents of the light.
that such a broadcasting station
We will be forced to charge the reception fee.
It is not at all possible to be convinced.
Recommendation 717 Opposite 17
I think I should stop the radio wave seriously.
Not only NHK but also the No morals of the broadcasting industry are too severe,
but self-cleaning is necessary as much as we expect.
Recommendation 599 Opposite 18
It seems certain that NHK has their partners inside,
such as making an even more prolific Chinese-oriented expression
on the new news,
and sending a video of the North Korean leader in an endless stream.
The problem is that it is only necessary for the Diet to pass the budget,
and there is no such thing as a general meeting of shareholders
and outside voices can not reach .
It is difficult to get rid of once inside the special people.
Recommendation 576 Opposite 11
Among the producers,
there are few people who know the time
of the Tiananmen incident in real time.
In fact,
it was a major incident that the nation killed and repressed its own people ,
but as an image it was about another country,
and it might have been put away as one of the historical episodes
that passed by.
But now, if you make such a program in China,
the producer should have got rid of it.
It should be understood that it is so serious, and in the fundamental part,
it is a theme that can not be described as funny and funny,
as it is a situation that does not change even now .
Recommendation 504 Opposite 9
In this case,
it became a great trauma for the People's Liberation Army soldiers
who were supposed to be the "people's army" on the side of the suppression.
Some units turned against the command and became a citizen's shield,
but as a matter of course it is not now.
I also think that it is journalism to dig in there.
Recommendation 445 Opposite 8
It is a sad case.
Guns were directed at students and citizens
who gathered to discuss peacefully!
I think this is a betrayal by a country that is not permitted in any country!
You should put out the truth to prevent this from happening again!
We believe that zombies
who are enshrined in the monsters of power can return to humans.
I pray for the happiness of many victims
Recommendation 345 Opposite 4
NHK must be dismantled
Recommendation 268 Opposite 10
Because it is NHK right? Of course we knew!
Because it is a speaker of the left wing
NHK will decide that there was no Tiananmen incident in the meantime
Recommendation 205 Opposite 13
It seems that you say something like NHK
A halfway position that is neither state-run nor private broadcast
A structure that can only make things like selling apologies to viewers somewhere,
although program scheduling
should be possible ignoring a certain meaning audience rating
So there is a contradiction
that you are there and the distance to the viewer is not half away
Recommendation 192 Opposite 7
"A live broadcast international news program that conveys in a sense of variety.
What is happening in the world now? What will happen after this?
Desks and reporters who have a wealth of expertise gently explain. "
It seems that it is a program for people who do not write for children
but do not have knowledge.
In the first half of the program,
the Tiananmen case was described in a naive manner, and in the second half,
it was structured to introduce what kind of circumstances the students
at that time are currently thinking and what to think in an interview format.
I watched the recording immediately thinking how bad the program was.
First of all, NHK 's site explains the purpose of the program.
If you look at it,
did you plainly explain how the incident is positioned in the present China?
It was an impression,
but there was not much sense of incongruity in the point
that did not depict the rawness of the case, and it was a bit disappointing.
So, when I examined the author's background,
I felt that it was pretty dumb, and I turned off the TV, thinking "I see."
Recommendation 160 Opposite 5
NHK split privatization.
JNR has also been made.
Recommendation 140 Opposite 3
Even if the communist member have China is ,
it is not the Chinese people have
I understood that to say.
Recommendation 112 Opposite 3
It seems that the non-payment for the receiving fee will increase
Was NHK prosperous ( powersat work behind the scenes )?
Recommendation 111 Opposite 5
NHK is silently delivering falsely biased information
To be honest, it can not be shown to children
as they may be imprinted with the wrong information
I want parents to sort out information
so that they are not really received by children
If you name a state-run broadcast,
you should make an effort to convey the correct truth and information
Well, it is impossible for this group occupied
by Chinese and South Korean staff
I want to dismantle quickly or privatize and get lost
without being able to collect earnings
Recommendation 97 Opposite 5
It can not be said that it can not be helped.
It is said that there were no deaths in the Tiananmen case,
It seems to be the official opinion of NHK .
Recommendation 93 Opposite 12
The Tiananmen case has a memory
that was nailed to the news as a shock when it was young.
In light of this report, NHK also strongly thought
that it should finish the role of public broadcast and make a program
with income from the sponsor normally.
If you do so,
I think that you will not be able to drop such an abnormal program a little.
Recommendation 88 Opposite 6
People should watch NHK more.
The program content should be checked, criticized, protested, etc.,
louder and more appealed, and the opinion of the project should be reflected.
Otherwise, there is no point in paying the receiving fee,
and it may be used to damage the national interest.
The government should make something like a target box.
Recommendation 87 Opposite 4
BTS members famous for atomic bomb T-shirts are crazy inside the bus Videos leaked! https://twitter.com/i/status/1062852872176451584
Overseas fans seem to be exactly the same
Suddenly overflowing with compliments of English praise. Creepy…
http://www.ekn.kr/news/article.html?no=398456
https://news.v.daum.net/v/20181106030037589
http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20181114000854
Dokdo is also doing anti-Japanese act of singing our territory.
The capital flight started
World stock price / Korea KOSPI
Do not move, government intervention,
Trading suspension, circuit breaker activation,
power off of server,
Koria have a proven track record.
Yuzuru Sato
Korea attacks Japan by combining hands with North Korea and China
Propaganda neglect affects the recreation of the comfort women problem,
the activities of Japanese companies around the world
Possibility of losing in the image strategy at the US jury trial.
DiffusionHopeGermanNGOSupportLaosAdoptVillage
DiffusionHopehttps://laos.oxfam.org/
Englisharticles futukiitihoyoujiyo
