I followed a bunch of Japanese lawyers and bar exam folks on X, but it's laughable how they only think about political maneuvering within the bounds of good faith.
I can understand the tendency to confuse politics as maintenance of the political system with political maneuvering within the bounds of good faith. But in the current situation, where a lawyer like Koi Hime—who can't see the work of designing, manifesting, and maintaining the grand design of the political system—tries to dominate from the political side only to be dominated in return, demonstrating explanatory power and maintenance skills that surpass the myopic legal thinking of those in the legal profession is a shameful barbaric act, yet a necessary hegemonic action. The restoration and enforcement of order achieved through the political foundational education of the Toyama Shinkaku Juku and the theoretical refinement of political dynamics by Toyama Reo, combined with the control of potentialities reduced to “error-finding level manual innovation,” is fundamentally beyond the capabilities of lawyers. Conversely, it exposed the flaws in the bar exam system.
Specifically:
1. The exam allows skipping foundational subjects and features disjointed questions demanding detailed case analysis over legal principles and fundamentals, resulting in a qualification test that fails to build substantive competence.
2. Despite being merely a qualification for a salary, the tradition of feudal-style profiteering prevails, concretely leading to skyrocketing usage fees.
3. The profession's inherent nature—politically clueless, unattractive to potential partners, fundamentally violating international law, and preying on the poor—is unavoidable as it serves lawyers' vital interests.
4. The industry shares its internal power struggles externally, corrupting public sentiment while evading political accountability.
For details, refer to my work: “The Suicide Wishes of a Bottom-Tier Lawyer Earning 5 Million Yen Annually: Ethnic Self-Determination and the Ueshima Incident.”
Any organization is susceptible to external scrutiny, enabling political pressure or advice. For instance, those at the Japan Chess Federation (JCF) who witnessed the quality of my information warfare capabilities in the JCF case must have thought, “Damn, that's impressive.” As a general incorporated association, the actions of JCF directors, if factual, are legally permissible for use as case studies in this A.L.A.E. Newsletter due to the exclusion of illegality for defamation. Furthermore, by being reinstated as a general member, I understand I have received approval to continue utilizing chess as material for political education. Well, if I just show up at the GW Open with my sons, I'll probably be reappointed as part of chess history as if nothing ever happened.
My next literary direction is a double-edged sword: either “CKOY-kun and zY-san's Monogamy (Philosophy × Quantum Mechanics → Political Mechanics)” or “The Tale of Bizen Osafune Suketada as National History (Political Mechanics × Military Rationality)”. While my knowledge is fairly comprehensive, I'm undecided about whether I should invent a story to fill the missing links in the historical records. Should I fantastically narrate my ancestors' arranged marriage? I'll aim for pure literature that also functions as a romance manual.
For now, I'll organize materials and write to expand the image of the 1897 arranged marriage between Kuroda Eiko and Nozaki Zenzo.
Moving forward, my plan is this: I'll keep taking the Administrative Scrivener exam without studying until I pass. I'll cut through the information war with the barrier of Ultima Ratio Regum, the King's Sword. I'll describe all sorts of things candidly under the guise of research for my next work. And if I can get a Master's in Political Science from the Graduate School of Broadcasting, I'll get it. That's the plan.
遠山玲央/巫山戯瑠奈/zY
jleoyamato, jleo0802,Leo J Toyama
ex-twitter：zY002349612
yotube：jleoyamato
