とあるXポストによると、人は10代に得られなかったものに一生執着するらしい。
私は10代で一番足りなかったのは「時間」であった。片道90分×10年は人を腐らせるには十分な時間だったなというわけだが、今の生活は時間的拘束はほぼないのでなかなか幸福な生活を送れている。
妻は10代にキャッキャうふふが一番足りなかったらしく、私とわちゃわちゃする事で、それなりに幸せとの事。
私は、最初の20年は天獄で基礎研究、次の20年は地獄で学理錬成、次の5年は煉獄の戦闘行動とすると、次の20年は何をするか。
とりあえず、
<世界の信仰>
和刀・言の葉λογός：地獄の刀
懐剣・備前長船助定：天獄の刀
ギター・アントニオ=マリン=モンテーロ・冬月：煉獄の器
政治力学の学理錬成：学習×勉強×研究
とすると、
15年後に息子×2が一応大人になったら選挙でも出るとして、この3年〜5年で行政書士と家政学修士を在宅で子育ての傍らゲットし、趣味のチェス&ギター&刀を逞しくしながら、行政書士→予備試験→司法試験と家政学修士→国連職員→参議院議員or都知事の二刀流でキャリアを構築していく。
45才は母と祖父と曽祖父が結婚した年代であり、さすがに身持ちを固めないと母方の貴族の伝統に背を向ける事になる。
行政書士試験と家政学修士院試を両方受けて、受かった方で次の15年を思料するとしよう。
弱み(苦手科目・伸び代)
行政書士試験:行政法の知識不足、記述問題(40文字×3)の演習不足→法務×政治学×チェス×ラテン語で総合的知力を高め過ぎた
家政学修士院試:英語専門用語の知識不足、面接試験に向けた根回し→比較神学×哲学×政治理論×家政学の学習×勉強×研究が足りない
現有のスキルポートフォリオでは、「物理学/ファインマン」「正義論/ロールズ」「外交/キッシンジャー」「剣の刃/ド・ゴール」を原語で読破する事がレベリングスキルの伸ばす方向性として正しいと自覚しており、行政書士試験対策として知力を落とし家政学修士院試対策として合格後の研究に生かすとすると、放送大学大学院で半永久的に研究する事になっている物理学と政治理論を棚上げし「外交/キッシンジャー」か「剣の刃/ド・ゴール」で共同親権制度の国際比較の研究に資する方を選べば良い。
フランス語を学ぶとすれば「サテュリコン/ペトロニウス」「ガリア戦記/カエサル」のLoeb版を使えばよいので、差し当たり読破すべき英語原典は「Diplomacy/Kissinger」と決した。
事変中に亡くなったキッシンジャー博士の後継者として、世界政治を楽しく支えていく事にしよう。
According to a certain X post, people apparently spend their whole lives obsessing over what they didn’t get in their teens.
For me, what I lacked most in my teens was “time.” A 90-minute commute each way for 10 years was more than enough time to make anyone bitter, but since my current life has almost no time constraints, I’m actually living a pretty happy life.
My wife says what she missed most in her teens was that carefree, giggly fun, and she’s fairly happy now just messing around with me.
If I consider the first 20 years as “Heavenly Prison” for basic research, the next 20 as “Hell” for refining theoretical principles, and the following 5 as “Purgatory” for combat operations, what should I do for the next 20 years?
For now,
<World Faith>
Japanese Sword · Kotobano Logos: The Sword of Hell
Pocket Sword · Bizen Osafune Sukesada: The Sword of Heavenly Prison
Guitar · Antonio Marín Montero Fuyutsuki: The Vessel of Purgatory
Theoretical Refinement of Political Dynamics: Learning × Studying × Research
Given that,
Assuming my two sons will be more or less adults in 15 years and I might run for office then, I’ll use these next 3 to 5 years to earn my Administrative Scrivener license and a Master’s in Home Economics through distance learning while raising my children at home. While vigorously pursuing my hobbies—chess, guitar, and swords—I’ll build a dual-track career: Administrative Scrivener → Preliminary Bar Exam → Bar Exam, and Master’s in Home Economics → UN Staff Member → Member of the House of Councillors or Governor of Tokyo.
Age 45 is the age at which my mother, grandfather, and great-grandfather got married; if I don’t settle down by then, I’ll be turning my back on the traditions of my mother’s noble lineage.
Let’s say I take both the Administrative Scrivener exam and the Master’s entrance exam in Home Economics, and plan the next 15 years based on whichever one I pass.
Weaknesses (Subjects I Struggle With / Areas for Improvement)
Administrative Scrivener Exam: Lack of knowledge in administrative law; insufficient practice on essay questions (40 characters × 3) → I’ve overdeveloped my comprehensive intellectual abilities through the study of law, political science, chess, and Latin.
Master’s Program in Home Economics Exam: Lack of knowledge regarding specialized English terminology; insufficient groundwork for the interview → Insufficient study, research, and learning in comparative theology, philosophy, political theory, and home economics.
Given my current skill portfolio, I realize that reading “Physics/Feynman” “Theory of Justice/Rawls,” “Diplomacy/Kissinger,” and “The Edge of the Sword/De Gaulle” in their original languages is the correct path to leveling up my skills. If I were to lower my intellectual standards for the Administrative Scrivener Exam and use the knowledge gained for post-admission research for the Master’s in Home Economics, I would have to set aside physics and political theory—which I’m set to study semi-permanently at the Open University Graduate School—and I should choose either “Diplomacy/Kissinger” or “The Edge of the Sword/De Gaulle”—whichever best contributes to my research on the international comparison of joint custody systems.
If I were to study French, I could use the Loeb editions of *Satyricon* by Petronius and *The Gallic Wars* by Caesar; therefore, I have decided that the English original text I should read for now is *Diplomacy* by Kissinger.
As the successor to Dr. Kissinger, who passed away during the incident, I intend to continue supporting world politics with enthusiasm.
Leo J Toyama
youtube：jleoyamatoLichess：jleo0802
X：zY2115436011807
