青天の霹靂・不定詞の名詞的用法なんていうモノはない | アメリカのトップ大学進学と英文法

アメリカのトップ大学進学と英文法

生成AIと量子コンピューターの時代に99%の日本の大学は対応できない。そんな日本の大学に進学しても時間を浪費するだけだ!最新の英文法(CGEL)を習得してアメリカのトップ大学に進学せよ!

学校で習っている英文法は実は間違いである・・・・と私は確信している。

 

Traditional English Grammar (TEG) Approach:

TEG typically classifies to-infinitives into three broad "functions":

  1. Noun – e.g., To read is enjoyable.

  2. Adjective – e.g., I have a book to read.

  3. Adverb – e.g., He came to help.

These labels are based on analogy with parts of speech, so if a to-infinitive appears where a noun might go, it's called a noun use, and so on.

 

Modern English Grammar (CGEL) Approach:

CGEL does not use the "noun/adjective/adverb" framework to classify to-infinitives. Instead, it focuses on clause structure, syntactic functions, and verb complementation patterns

 

Key Differences

Concept

Traditional Grammar

Modern Grammar (CGEL)

Core framework

Parts of speech 

(noun, etc.)

Clause structure and syntactic function

To-infinitive as "noun"

Based on position

Analyzed as to-infinitival clause functioning as subject or object

To-infinitive as "adjective"

Based on modifying a noun

Analyzed as postmodifier in a noun phrase

To-infinitive as "adverb"

Based on modifying a verb

Analyzed as adjunct (e.g., purpose, result, etc.)