Trump neglecting legal practice ...

Dangerous “Business Korea US Alliance”

https://news.v.daum.net/v/20191031050616399
kisukpark@seoul.co.kr [ Seoul Newspaper ]

Park Kisok Reporter2019.10.31.05: 06
 

TrumpNeglectingDangerousBusinessKoreaUSAlliance2

TrumpNeglectingDangerousBusinessKoreaUSAlliance1

법도관행도 무시한 트럼프..위험한'비즈니스한미동맹'

法度慣行も無視したトランプ..危険な「ビジネス韓国米国同盟」2

法度慣行も無視したトランプ.. 危険な「ビジネス韓国米国同盟」1

 

 

Kurdish ignored by  Trump...

Also bears management

of the alliance of the Korea-U.S. Alliance

YTN 2019/10/11

Subtitles-Settings-Subtitles ( 1 )-Automatic translation-Language
 

[ News analysis]

“Korean have to give out 70 trillion contributions a year

speech ring on the Ripples

SMA negotiations claim new US operation support costs
The same burden is also requested from allies.
Criticism of " 66 years of clan reckless idea"
Kang Kyung-wha康京和,강경화)

“There was no cost requirement for strategic assets”

 

Donald Trump

Recently, the military spending amount

and scope have been greatly increased towards Korea.

The scope of military operations is contrary

to the Korea-US Mutual Defense Treaty

Requested to extend to areas other than the Korean Peninsula

The facts are becoming clearer and ripples are spreading.

 

President Donald Trump

Isn't it possible to gain access to alliances with excessive understanding?

The foundation of the Korea-US alliance that has been solidified for 66 years

The president of a four- year term is a dangerous idea that recklessly shakes

Criticism has been raised.

 

James Mathis is a secretary secretary for the former US Secretary of Defense

According to this new book published by Guy Snodgrass on 29th (local time),

President Trump

Create 12 economic utility measures to assess the relationship

between the United States and other countries,

According to the standard, Korea rated it as the worst.

 

President Trump

“The US military stationed overseas acts as a futon to protect security”

In the explanation of former Secretary Matisse

“(Korea) US $ 60 billion a year (approximately 70 trillion won)

It ’s okay to make a deal ”

He refuted.

 

Decide contributions from next year

In the negotiations for the 11th Korea-US Defense Cost Sharing Agreement

( SMA ),

The burden of Korea claimed by the US is 5 billion dollars (about 6 trillion won)

It ’s five times more than the burden of 1,038.9 billion won this year,

70 times as much money as Guy Snodgrass's exposure

Trump is shocking as he mentioned.

 

In the US, strategic assets such as the B52 strategic bomber

The cost of deploying from Guam to the Korean peninsula,

Some of the observations

that South Korea requested to bear have also been made.

In contrast,

Kang Kyung-wha康京和,강경화)Director-General of Foreign Affairs,

30th

“So far ( SMA negotiations)

We received a report that there was no specific requirement

for the cost of deploying strategic assets. ''

It was.

 

But the United States will be an SMA adjunct at a future meeting

Expanding the scope and scale

of the “Execution for Assistance for Outer Military Demand”

Request an impression

Expanding the execution of regional foreign military support assistance,

The prospect is coming out.

 

Park Wong Gong 朴元坤,박 원곤)Professor of Han Dong University

"The US expanded negotiations
on the implementation of support for extraterrestrial military demand,
Or “U.S. forces in Korea vs. preparation cost”
Can be requested to establish a new comprehensive item.
It was.

 

On the other hand,

the US will come with SMA negotiations to support operations.

Exceeds the share of the US military presence in Korea,

and part of the cost of operations performed by the United States worldwide

The suspicion is also raised that they are trying to pass on to Korea.

 

The US deploys strategic assets to the Korean Peninsula

and conducts alliance training with South Korea.

In addition to trying to suppress North Korea,

In the aspect that there is a purpose to restrain China,

It is viewed as opposed to the Pacific strategy of India in the United States.

 

Since the U.S. recently changed its control over wartime operations,

The alliance crisis management scope of the Korea-US Alliance Command

It was also requested to expand from "in the event of a Korean peninsula"

to "in the case of an emergency in the United States"

It can be seen with such intention.

In other words, in the war that the United States develops

in the whole world including the Middle East

The story is that you can share the damage by pulling in the Korean army.

 

If such observations are correct, the Trump administration

The “law” of the Korea-US Mutual Defense Treaty and the Korea-US Alliance

Ignoring the long-standing “practice” and just “business mind”

He blames the Korea-US alliance.

 

Shin Bon- cheol(신범철)

Asan Policy Researcher, Director of Security Unification Center,

“President Trump has been a part of the US-universal alliance in the past.

For example, the division of defense costs

in the keynote of switching to the US-Korea Alliance

We will consider all the cases and raise problems in Korea. "

such as.