ステフォン・ハリス 「ジャズバンドの即興演奏に”間違い”という文字はない」 | TEDのすゝめ ( TED 英語 スーパープレゼンテーション 洋楽 映画 スポーツ )

TEDのすゝめ ( TED 英語 スーパープレゼンテーション 洋楽 映画 スポーツ )

英語の勉強をしているみなさんに、おすすめのTEDトークを紹介します。
TEDのホームページには interactive transcript という便利な機能がついているので、直接、TEDのホームページで見ることをお勧めします。
あちこちへ脱線しますがご容赦ください~(^o^)v

ステフォン・ハリス 「バンドスタンドではミスなんてない」
TEDのホームページ(日本語字幕付き)へはをクリックしてください。
直接ここで観ることもできます。
Stefon Harris: There are no mistakes on the bandstand

小さいことは気にすんなッ、主題と主張をつかもう!
これを見て最初に頭に浮かんだのが、「お笑い」のこと。
ある芸人のネタがスベってしまったときに、別の芸人がそれを拾ってくれると、
笑いに変わるのに似ていると感じました。

【話題】 注意深く、周囲に耳を傾ける
【時間】 13分11秒
【要約】
1.ジャズバンドの即興演奏
 とりあえず演奏を始めてみないと、何が起こるかわからない

2.バンドスタンドとは
 ミュージシャンが、即興の演奏をするステージ
 先を予測することも、後ろを振り返ることもできない
 その瞬間に反応することが求められる場所

3.演奏上の「間違い」について
 そもそもジャズ演奏家に「間違い」という概念はない
 「間違い」とは他の演奏家に受け入れられないこと
 外れた音や不協和音は、失敗ではなくて「チャンス」だと考える

4.チャンスは突然やってくる
 音楽理論としてはミスかもしれない
 しかし他の演奏家が反応して受け入れれば、チャンスに変わる

5.周囲に耳を傾ける
 すばらしい音楽を演奏するために必要なのは「聴くこと」
 主導権を握って、自分の主張を押し付けるのではなく、
 忍耐強く周囲に耳を傾け、協調することによって創造性が生まれる

【語彙】
bandstand :バンドスタンド、ジャズの即興演奏のステージ
perceive :気づく
dissonance :不協和音
conceptually :理論的に、概念的に
unpredictable :予測できない
take for granted :当たり前だと思う
micromanage :細かく管理する
bully :無理に強いる、いじめる
intensity :強烈さ、激しさ
nuanced :繊細な

【transcripts】
Okay, I have no idea what we're going to play. I won't be able to tell you what it is until it happens. I didn't realize there was going to be a little music before. So I think I'm going to start with what I just heard.

(Music)

Okay, so first of all, let's welcome Mr. Jamire Williams on the drums, (Applause) Burniss Travis on the bass, (Applause) and Mr. Christian Sands on the piano.

So the bandstand, as we call it, this is an incredible space. It is really a sacred space. And one of the things that is really sacred about it is that you have no opportunity to think about the future, or the past. You really are alive right here in this moment. There are so many decisions being made when you walk on the bandstand. We had no idea what key we were going to play in. In the middle, we sort of made our way into a song called "Titi Boom." But that could have happened -- maybe, maybe not. Everyone's listening. We're responding. You have no time for projected ideas.

So the idea of a mistake: From the perspective of a jazz musician, it's easier to talk about someone else's mistake. So the way I perceive a mistake when I'm on the bandstand -- first of all, we don't really see it as a mistake. The only mistake lies in that I'm not able to perceive what it is that someone else did. Every "mistake" is an opportunity in jazz. So it's hard to even describe what a funny note would be.

So for example, if I played a color, like we were playing on a palette, that sounded like this ... (Music) So if Christian played a note -- like play an F. (Music) See, these are all right inside of the color palette. If you played an E. See, these all lie right inside of this general emotional palette that we were painting. If you played an F# though, (Dissonance) to most people's ears, they would perceive that as a mistake.

So I'm going to show you, we're going to play just for a second. And we're going to play on this palette. And at some point, Christian will introduce this note. And we won't react to it. He'll introduce it for a second and then I'll stop, I'll talk for a second. We'll see what happens when we play with this palette.

(Music)

So someone could conceptually perceive that as a mistake. The only way that I would say it was a mistake is in that we didn't react to it. It was an opportunity that was missed. So it's unpredictable. We'll paint this palette again. He'll play it. I don't know how we'll react to it, but something will change. We'll all accept his ideas, or not.

(Music)

So you see, he played this note. I ended up creating a melody out of it. The texture changed in the drums this time. It got a little bit more rhythmic, a little bit more intense in response to how I responded to it. So there is no mistake. The only mistake is if I'm not aware, if each individual musician is not aware and accepting enough of his fellow band member to incorporate the idea and we don't allow for creativity.

So jazz, this bandstand is absolutely amazing. It's a very purifying experience. And I know that I speak for all of us when I tell you that we don't take it for granted. We know that to be able to come on the bandstand and play music is a blessing. So how does this all relate to behavioral finance? Well we're jazz musicians, so stereotypically we don't have a great relationship to finance.

Anyway, I just wanted to sort of point out the way that we handle it. And the other dynamic of it is that we don't micromanage in jazz. You have some people who do. But what that does is it actually limits the artistic possibilities. If I come up and I dictate to the band that I want to play like this and I want the music to go this way, and I just jump right in ... ready, just play some time. One, two, one, two, three, four. (Music) It's kind of chaotic because I'm bullying my ideas. I'm telling them, "You come with me over this way."

If I really want the music to go there, the best way for me to do it is to listen. This is a science of listening. It has far more to do with what I can perceive than what it is that I can do. So if I want the music to get to a certain level of intensity, the first step for me is to be patient, to listen to what's going on and pull from something that's going on around me. When you do that, you engage and inspire the other musicians and they give you more, and gradually it builds. Watch. One, two, a one, two, three, four.

(Music)

Totally different experience when I'm pulling ideas. It's much more organic. It's much more nuanced. It's not about bullying my vision or anything like that. It's about being here in the moment, accepting one another and allowing creativity to flow.

Thank you.