Hollywood action movies are full of murder scenes.
When a monster alien or something like that appears, the hero or heroine keeps beating until their bodies are splattered with blood and disintegrated.
I am sick and tired of movies full of murder and killing scenes.
In addition, the deafening sound of explosions, scenes so speedy that you can hardly follow them with your eyes, and so on, keep giving the viewer a strong and persistent stimulus.
Mr. Rambo shoots machine guns and kills dozens of people at once.
It is no wonder that shootings often occur in the United States.
The murderer cannot be said to have been influenced by these movies at all.
Is it possible that the birth of detective novels was the reason why "murder" has become so readily incorporated into movies and novels?
Certainly, solving a murder mystery is a clear and straightforward story that is likely to hold the reader's interest until it is solved.
But the chances of an ordinary person being involved in an actual murder case are almost nil.
Close to 100% of people go their entire lives without ever seeing a murder scene.
Therefore, it is absolutely impossible for people to die by the dozens and dozens in a two-hour movie, except for those who have experienced war.
Of course, the audience is aware that the film is completely fictional.
But can people really be moved by a story that is completely unrealistic?
I don't enjoy fiction that is too far from reality.
Whenever I see scenes of murder and killing, I always feel that there is no point in watching something that is completely unrealistic for me.
Even if it is a fiction, if it is something that could happen to me..., I can enjoy it very much.
People around the world will gradually mature in their appreciation of movies.
The easy way of thinking that "if you make a film full of murderous and lethal stimuli, the number of viewers will increase and the box-office revenues will rise" will soon no longer be valid.