へそ下三寸問題は当該人物が社員同士なら、社外でも会社の責任?  | ニューヨークと東京に暮らす変な経営者のひとりごと

ニューヨークと東京に暮らす変な経営者のひとりごと

(旧タイトル、NYと六本木ヒルズに住む経営者のひとりごと) 
ニューヨークと東京で会社を経営してます。 NYがベースで、年間10回以上、NYー東京間を往復しています。 アメリカ生活が30年以上になるので、日本にいると沢山の驚きがあります。そんな驚きを綴っています。

ちょっと内容が難しいです。 ご興味のある方は読んでみてくださいね。 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 雇用機会均等委員会の訴訟に関するバーディクトです。 
弊社もかつてEEOCに訴訟されました。
 
10年ぐらい前、75才を超える女性を雇っていて、契約を解消したら、Age Discrimination であるとEEOCを絡めて訴訟されました。 当時弊社は勝訴しました。
 
 
アメリカで会社を経営していると何度も訴訟されますし、その度に訴訟せざるをえません。住みにくい国です笑。
 

 

雇用機会均等委員会のメルマガをサブスクライブしているので、定期的にE E O C のニュースが流れてきます。

アメリカでは、このように、社外で社員同士の性的歪みによるリビドーが原因で揉めたことでも会社が訴訟され多額の金額が被告側に支払われるのですね。

従業員ポリシーを定期的に見直し、最新の犯罪にも対応できるように努めなければいけないということです。 

 

日本ではもっと甘いのかどうか知りませんがな。 

https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USEEOC/bulletins/27296cd

 

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
December 20, 2019
Media inquiries: 202-663-4191 or newsroom@eeoc.gov

 

UNITED AIRLINES TO PAY $321,000 AND FIGHT INTERNET HARASSMENT TO SETTLE EEOC DISCRIMINATION SUIT


Pilot Repeatedly Posted Sexually Explicit Photos of a Flight Attendant
To Websites for Years, Federal Agency Charged

 

SAN ANTONIO, Texas – United Airlines, Inc., a Chicago-headquartered international airline operating in over 300 airports across five continents, has agreed to pay $321,000, plus attorney’s fees, to settle a sexual harassment lawsuit brought by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the federal agency announced today.

The EEOC’s lawsuit alleged that, over the course of many years, a United captain frequently posted explicit images of a flight attendant to multiple websites, without her consent, making reference to her name, home airport, and the airline’s tagline “Fly the Friendly Skies.” The EEOC’s suit asserted that the images were seen by co-workers of the flight attendant, as well as untold numbers of potential passengers, causing her humiliation and embarrassment and adversely affecting her work environment.

The EEOC maintained that United failed to prevent and correct the pilot’s behavior, even after the flight attendant made numerous complaints and provided substantial evi­dence to the airline of the pilot’s conduct. The EEOC asserted that the pilot was allowed to retire with benefits despite initiation of a criminal prosecution by the U.S. attorney’s office under federal internet stalking laws.

Such alleged inaction when an employer is aware of sexual harassment violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination based on sex, including harass­ment that creates a hostile environment. The EEOC filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division (EEOC v. United Airlines, Inc., Civil Action No. 5:18-cv-817) after first attempting to reach a voluntary settlement through its conciliation process.

“Employers are best served when they fulfill their obligation to be diligent in preventing and correcting sexual harassment, whether the offensive conduct takes place in the workplace or involves misconduct by an employee on the internet that affects the work environment,” said Philip Moss, a trial attorney in the EEOC’s San Antonio Field Office. “This resolution can serve to send a message to employers that they should have robust anti-harassment policies that are vigorously self-enforced.”  

The consent decree resolving this case, approved by U.S. District Judge Xavier Rodriguez, requires the company to pay monetary damages of $321,000, plus attorney’s fees for the flight attendant and to provide notice to company employees of their protections under Title VII. The decree further requires the airline to revise its sexual harassment policies explicitly to include harassing conduct perpetrated through the internet or social media and affecting the work environment whether on or off duty.

EEOC Supervisory Trial Attorney Eduardo Juarez of the EEOC’s San Antonio Field Office explained, “Employers must not ignore harassment complaints simply because the harasser holds a position of authority.”

Robert A. Canino, regional attorney of the EEOC’s Dallas District, added, “This case highlights the issues of employer accountability for harassment in the modern workplace. Employee workdays and jobsites are no longer defined by timecards and the walls of a building, but by the breadth of a digital day and the reach of electronic communications. The policy United has agreed to implement can perhaps serve to provide ideas for other companies adapting to the increased risks posed by employee misuse of technology.”

The flight attendant who intervened in the EEOC’s federal lawsuit was individually represented by attorney Colin Walsh of the Austin, Texas office of Wiley Walsh, P.C.

The San Antonio Field Office is part of the EEOC’s Dallas District Office, which is responsible for processing charges of discrimination, administrative enforcement, and the conduct of agency litiga­tion in Texas and parts of New Mexico.

The EEOC advances opportunity in the workplace by enforcing federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. More information is available at www.eeoc.gov.  Stay connected with the latest EEOC news by subscribing to our email updates.