Ref.>"【北朝鮮】もはや生きていけない… 金持ちの餓死も相次ぐ"
>"Colaboさん「10代女性のバスカフェ、ぜんぶ無料！（ﾊﾟｼｬﾘ）」"
>"在日外国人「日本政府に永住権を剥奪されそうなので漫画にしました…」→ 炎上"
-----------------------------------------
> 埼玉県川口市議会議員がクルド人問題を羅列「川口で起きている問題は多様性とか多文化共生の土俵に乗る以前の問題です」で話題
Translation of X (* tweets) by Che Su-kyoung (on '24. 3/11)
>"https://twitter.com/Che_SYoung/status/1767001147414564924"
> デジャブ
> 私がむかつくと思うのは、
>①事件当時は情報が少なく事件、人物、原因などについて間違った認識、誤解が生じることもある
>②しかし時間が経って冷静に見れるようになったら、①の間違い、誤解について再評価、反省会が必要
>③にも関わらず 21世紀になっても彼を闘士、犠牲者扱いするメディアにかっかり（ママ）
>④彼の末年近くで面倒見たり、一緒に暮らした人はみんな彼を見捨てた。
> むしろ周りの人たちが被害者だった。
> 彼を犠牲者扱いしていたメディアと文化人はその時何をした？
> 移民、難民問題が話題になることがあるが、近くで面倒見たり、一緒に暮らす覚悟でいる人はどれくらいいるだろうか？
> 新聞社、放送局で簡単な作業でも彼らを雇えばビザ問題は解決する。
> 彼らも喜ぶ。
> なぜやらない？
> 下手に雇ったらどうなるか分かってるからだろう。
> だから偽善に見えるのだ。
Deja vu.
What I feel disgusting is as follows;
1) There was little information at the time of the case, therefore incorrect "perceptions" & "misunderstandings" may occur about the "case", "person," "cause", etc.
2) However, as time passes and when it's possible to look at that calmly, "re-evaluation" & "reflection" are necessary on "mistakes" & "misunderstandings" of 1)
3) Despite this, even in the 21st century, I'm disappointed in the media that treats him as a "fighter" and "victim"
4) In his final years, everyone who cared for him or lived with him abandoned him.
Rather, the persons around him were the victims.
What did the media and cultural persons, who treated him as a victim, do around that time?
Immigration and refugee issues are often talked about. How many persons are willing to take care of nearby or live with them?
If they hire them for even simple tasks at newspaper companies and broadcasting stations, their visa problem will be resolved.
They will be also delighted.
Why don't they do so?
Probably, they reason why is that they know what will happen if they hire them easily.
That's why it seems hypocritical.
>"https://twitter.com/Che_SYoung/status/1766767142517834169"
> この人が死んだ時、毎日新聞は社会面をほぼ半分近くこの人に関する内容だった。
> 朝日も似たような感じで弱者、悲劇の主人公みたいに書いた。
> 事件当時から１mmも進歩してないと感じた。
> 私は韓国で出した本でもこの人を批判したが、若い頃出所した彼を地元の警察が色々支援した。
> そのおかげで開業した朝鮮料理屋も順序だったが、女遊びに店をほったらかし経営破綻。
> ヤクザの借金まみれ。
> 韓国で彼の救命運動をしたお坊さんさえ「救命運動したことを後悔してる」と嘆いたほどのダメ人間。
> 何より人質取って対峙してる時、ライフル性能試しに罪のない犬を撃ち殺したのは犬好きとして許せない。
> こんな人間を大島渚など当時の文化人、リベラルは支援、支持してた。
> しかし「彼と一緒に暮らしてみろ」と言ったら１週間も耐えられずみんな逃げただろう🙄
When this person died, the Mainichi Shimbun devoted almost half of its social section to the contents about this person.
The Asahi Shimbun was similar to that, and wrote like he was weak & hero of tragedy.
I felt like they didn't made an inch of progress since the case.
I criticized this person in a book published in S. Korea too. When he was released from prison at a young age, the local police provided various support to him.
A Korean restaurant he opened thanks to that was working well. However, he ignored the restaurant due to chasing after women and it therefore went bankrupt.
He was full of debt to yakuza (gangster).
He was such a bad person that even a monk who campaigned for his life in S. Korea lamented, saying that "I regret doing his life-saving campaign."
Above all, as a dog lover, I can't forgive him to have shot an innocent dog to death to test the performance of the rifle, when he took hostages and confronted (with the police).
The "cultural figures" and "liberals" around that time, such as "Oshima Nagisa," supported such a person.
But if they had been said that "you should live with him," everyone would've been impossible to forebear even one week and run away🙄
>'《差別を訴えた殺人犯の "特別待遇"》「これでは召使いだ」とぼやいた看守…英雄視された人質立てこもり犯の刑務所生活'
