Hi And Welcome My R / C Listening Audience And Online Article Readers. We Will Of Course Be Talking About Future Technology, Future Innovative Developments, And Futuristic Concepts. Certainly, I Surely Hope The Mayan Calendar Was Incorrect, Or Perhaps Those Chiselling It Merely Ran away of stone simply, went out of rock to chisel on, which means world will be saved from whatever it is that the Mayans thought might bring about a new age or renewal.
Fine so, I'd like to dive into our subject areas for today's radio discussion show and I'm sure by now you understand the format, basically, "I will perform the talking for about thirty minutes minus ads and your job is to listen Carefully, Develop Comments And Questions, And Then I'Ll Open Up The Product Lines To Notice What You Have To Say. "As You Also Probably Know We Do Not Respond To Online Work Comments That Happen To Be Not Intellectually Based. Which Suggest You can not have an opinion, nor does it mean that it should be the same as mine. Actually if you do too much preaching to the choir, Let myself simply cut you off, perhaps agree with you, and go to the next caller.
Our job is to have an intellectual discussion, dialogue, issue and discourse. That's why you're here, and which my mission, and we will complete it. Now then, obviously there is a tremendous amount of speak about innovation, the need for innovators and entrepreneurs in our nation to keep us strong, vibrant, and the leading edge of technology. You will not get any disagreement here on that reality, nonetheless it seems as if the word "innovation" is probably one of the most over- used words in the British language currently, perhaps other than "unsustainable" which by the way, some things which may make them appear to be unsustainable or dire problems we believe we face today, but could really be solved with the technology of the future.
Einstein used to express that; "it takes a brilliant person to solve a problem, but it takes a creative guru to avoid the challenge from at any time happening first place, very well and therefore, I would personally say that the creative geniuses don ' t always get the credit for solving the problems, nevertheless the brilliant person will, even if their previous solutions changed into unintentional consequences, and they are rehired to fix what they broke the 1st time after supposedly fixing something to save us all.
Fine therefore, here is where I'm going to start out tossing out topics, after some discussion attached to each one. They will run the gamut all across the board from research fiction issues to present latest and greatest solutions and what they might mean for our future. I will also put out some personal original ground breaking concepts, as We think of at least two new original concepts every day, and can discuss those as well if you wish, or perhaps you will find a different topic for our dialogue here . Right now then let's get started with the first topic;
. You) Will Physical Cash Survive the Next 3 Decades - Hackers and Trade Questioned
Actually, money has little or no value -? Consider a dollar bill, it's simply a flimsy document, so how much is it really worth We all believe that it is worth whatever it says on the face of it whether it is one buck, five dollars, $ 10, 20 dollars, $ 50, or perhaps a C-note. Funds only works individuals have faith in its value, and what it can buy. Most of the money which is created these days never actually exists in an genuine form, it only is present in the digital world. For instance, you might get paid from a Corporation, that money could be digitally transferred into the bank account. You might then use your TELLER MACHINES to buy something, or pay bills online, but you never had that money in your hot little hands. Things have changed a lot in the last 30 years have not they?
So what may happen in another 3 decades I ask? Can we still have physical money, or will it become digitized, and will you ever have any money in your budget to buy something? Generally there are some futurists that believe money will go out the window, in other words physical money, and everything will be digital later on. But what if our society and civilization will not trust digital money? What if they are really worried that our banks are being hacked? Recently in the fall of 2012 coming from noted that our banking institutions have come under cyber-attacks from Iran at least Leon Panetta believes that is where the attacks came from, but who is to say in the foreseeable future if we have a war with another nation that cyber-attacks on our monetary system will not be included?
In fact, monetary warfare is becoming rather common, why just consider the sanctions, control wars, and our efforts to stop the amount of money movement from terrorists, drug traders, money launderers, and human being traffickers, along with the central banking computer systems of rogue nation-states and their money transfers for things like oil, natural resources, and military equipment?
Then there is the issue currently where more and more people are making mobile payments on their mobile personal technical devices. Today they're buying a cup of espresso, a hamburger, or various items at retail stores. In the future it might be considerably more , or if that becomes difficult to rely on or those personal technology devices are being hacked, perhaps through downloaded software with malware, or from users surfing websites with malware, then people will not trust mobile repayments. Some have suggested that some personal tech devices may actually come with pre-loaded back-doors or software that could be employed by hackers to steal data or commit identity fraud crimes.
Presently there may come a time where people do not wish to buy anything online, or do online bank because they do not trust the system, they avoid want their money to disappear one day into someone else's account in some foreign country. Having someone drain your standard bank account only needs to happen once, in support of needs to happen to a close friend or a family member before everyone they know becomes questionable. In that case you will not want to work with digital money, and that case more people will decide to use physical money, it is therefore quite possible that physical money will exist simply as a safety factor for decades to come.
But how safe is your physical money heading to be in circumstance of a natural catastrophe, or a wildfire that burned down your home, or an earthquake? What about a hurricane with a huge tidal spike, a tsunami, or a major river which hopped its banks? Is your physical money safe, how much safer is it that your digital money in that case? Speaking of natural disasters and flooding events, maybe we can better predict them in the future? Why do not we speak about that for a moment with the next subject;
2.) We Require A Real Test for 100-Year Flood Mathematical Ruse - A Thought
How do we better produce numerical simulations for flood areas and specific zones, or the proverbial 100 year flood? What can we do to better fine-tune these mathematical models so that they are completely accurate? Lots of work has been done in the past depending on elevation, and flood umschlüsselung. But there's more to it than that, there are all types of other things to consider along with erosion patterns. I want to give you a thought here?
We realize the times, temperatures, rain, and run-off right, we realize history, plus we measured the ground before and after right? Thus, any really good mathematical simulation for chafing should look the same as the actual if you input the way the terrain once was with the interim conditions to what it is now. Notice that point.
There is a very interesting Youtube-video I recommend viewing on this matter, well a side concern, that of agricultural top soil erosion; "Dave Montgomery - Dirt: The Chafing of Civilizations," now then, let me exhibit my ideas on this as , all of these theories and speculation make a lot of sense with unlimited examples in the present period on smaller scales - common sense, observable, and so prudent, so then, Occam's Razor blade survives.
So, my supposition of Dave Montgomery's spiel and theory would be the same. Indeed, this was a great spiel, solid evidence, and research. Okay so, now we can now put out these findings to help calibrate mathematic soil chafing models and simulations. Right now then let me ask another question, or perhaps the same question a different way;
3.) Do we Use Mathematic Fractal Simulation to Trick A Human When Looking at Erosion Patterns?
If so, would that wind up as the Turing Test? Of course, if so, can I actually call that the Digital Reality Winslow Test, called after me for great deal of thought? In the event you are a preliminary like I am, and . you fly in the surfaces, you see various habits of how the foothills and erosion had considered place over the previous thousand to 10, 1000 years You can see floodplains, mountains, canyons, and it all makes sense - you can see exactly how the drinking water flows, or had ran during the past. What if we used your computer to design erosion patterns that never happened, and suppose we asked a human, perhaps a pilot who has seen and flown over such terrain many times in the past whether it It was real or not?
?? Will be our computer simulations adequate to fool the human being eye I'm talking about a trained observer who has seen these things before over and over again Is that possible;. In my opinion it is And so, how would you know when looking at Google Ground if you are looking at a computer performance, or a fake Birdseye view which perhaps is covering up an armed service base, or a top secret area? The reality is you do not, until now? How about those who be employed by the national satellite tv intelligence agencies, where all they actually is study terrain maps? Could they pick away the?
Before you answer that question, why may you use Google Ground on the satellite view and fly above the deserts in Nevada. A few of that stuff looks pretty weird with weird colors, but it's all real. If perhaps you doubt that it can real, go ahead and fly over southern Republic of bolivia on Google Earth and appear at some of that terrain in their sodium flats region and up against the mountains, you get the same interesting colors, much of it does not appear to be real either, but it is. Some of the features that NASA (NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION) has viewed on Roter planet (umgangssprachlich) do not look real, nonetheless they are.
No, they are not the same as Soil because the erosion habits that we see now might have been created by wind, we have a different atmosphere, or deficiency of. Perform you see my point? Recently, I was seeing an online video address about erosion patterns, Sophie Wolfram's New Form of Scientific research, and Mathematica -.. fractals and mathematical simulations and projections of erosion habits They are amazingly foreseeable, and this in itself is interesting It's as if you can see the geological record through the ages.
You should look some of this up yourself. And speaking of free lectures, School level lectures on just about any topic you are longing, I wonder if that changes the future of our higher education, why go to school and pay $ 100, 000 to get a professional a great when you can learn almost as much online through self-study? Yes, interesting, performs this mean it can the death of the University, or are we entering a new time of information flow in education? Let's go forward and speak about lecture type learning.
4.) Will like to learn Whilst Watching an Online video Lecture - Go Whole Screen and Ditch Muddiness
First, if you are within an university address hall, playing the best and brightest professor on a given topic will be certainly a good chance you could fall asleep, but still your attention span will be longer because you are there, and there are not . the same disruptions as watching an online video If you are watching an University level video at home on your computer in a little box on the screen - there are lots of distractions.
. Pertaining to instance other things is in the room, perhaps the passing bell, TV, or your cellular phone rings You might feel the need to text message someone back, visit the refrigerator get something to eat, or maybe zone out - listening as long as you're doing something else, assuming that you can multitask and learn something complicated at the same time. It's not that you can not, it can that you probably refuses to and your memory preservation level will be next to nothing, and get . wasted everyone's time, and some bandwidth to shoe Still, let me ask another question;
5.) Is The Lecture Dry - Even If It can All Online and No cost In the foreseeable future?
This is a decent question, although you may argue with it. On August 20, 2012 there was clearly an article in the technology news. Harvard had set up two free courses online in computer science. These were obviously following Stanford computer science department's lead, .. as they did the same thing last year Harvard had the same results over 100, 000 people signed up, people from all over the world There's no shortage of men and women who wish to learn online, but in doing this; are they reducing their own throats as they distribute information to the rest of the world at no cost, or are they enhancing their own credibility by doing so? It could lead to more people who wish to enroll in that school in the future, therefore greater application.
. Regardless, everything is changing fast, even if the basic lecture at our universities has not changed much considering that the 1800s Indeed, I actually recommend that you watch the Youtube-video; "Do not address me" (with Twitter track) - Donald Clark at ALT-C 2010, "because this gentlemen constitutes a great deal of sense Perhaps also of interest is another Youtube-video titled;." Re-inventing the Lecture (Or, Why On-line Lectures Do not Work, and Whatever we Can Do Regarding It). "
Indeed, I actually think as soon as you watch those videos you may better able to comment on what I'm talking about here, and it is something that needs to be discussed. We desire a countrywide dialogue on this, that is if we want . to propel technology and innovation, and couple that with entrepreneurship moving our great nation forward into the future Next I've like to discuss;
. Six) Large Universities, Great Tuition, and Big Properties and Beautiful Architecture - Are We Learning However?
Why is it that we put a whole lot hope into our larger educational institutions? It's interesting is not it? They spend billions of15506 money putting up great buildings and large buildings but is the fact really what makes them great? Even if someone has a great building, it does not mean they really know what they're speaking about, consider some of the major chapels in the world for instance, or the most significant mosques Can it be the high prices the Universities fee;. does which make them great? Having been in operation all my life, I can recall various attorneys actually raising their price just so they could get more business because people thought it they incurred more per hour they have to be good, they are not.
Indeed, if a huge school spends all their money on landscaping, beautiful packet work, great statues outside the house the lecture halls, and is one with the epitome of divine buildings -. Then they have less money to train you with They have less cash to hire the best professors, buy the best equipment, or provide the best future because of their students. That's not to say that they can not, perhaps they get you to pay them far in excess of the amount of education and you just have . to the pay for all that extra stuff If you can get a spiel online for free on YouTube - in many regards the knowledge is basically the same.
Perhaps In The Future Your Living Room Gaming Virtual Reality Technology Will Project A Holographic Professor In 3-D Getting The Professor To You, And It Can Be Done For A Portion Of The Cost, There Is Building To Pay For, Perhaps The Building, And the professor, and everything else can be expected around your living room and you will feel as if you light beer are. Therefore, you find the same experience, and conversation, perhaps even breaking up into groups with virtual-reality avatars as fellow students. Who needs college or university any longer? Better yet, who needs to take out $ 22.99, 000 in student lending options for the same exact information, minus the big building?
Even now, in your living room gaming center which increases as your new education headquarters, and your latest virtual or augmented truth 3-D holographic computer game immersion device -. You might actually be training the artificial intelligent supercomputer network to think like a human That . information might be employed by future robotic systems for any forms of things from self-driving trucks, cars, and planes through virtual-reality simulator coaches to future combat vehicles in the battle space Speaking of which I actually have another question for you;
7.) Will need to We Crowd Source Satellite television Data for Future Military services Convoys?
Well, if we did that, we did not have to tell anyone who was looking at the satellite data when or where we would be moving troops, equipment, or resources, we could just say that this is one of the potential routes for a while in the future, and if you find an anomaly symbol it down. Those who find the most caractère will receive a check in the mail, or a gift idea certificate to their favorite retail store by the end of two months. That they won ' t know when, where, or which anomaly they found was your one which garnered them the free surprise card.
The ones that find more real anomalies than fake positives would be given a higher level of point spread for us dollars per anomalies they found. Further, they might get an extra hundred us dollars in the mail monthly because they had a higher credibility rating. In the event that we did this eventually the algorithms watching the very best human brains find these anomalies could work out how they are doing it, and precisely what is getting their eye, and so we could better design unnaturally intelligent satellite analyzing methods which would incorporate what sort of human brain thinks, and just how a computer thinks which will give to us the best of all worlds by putting those two together.
Perhaps in a way, humans are actually training supercomputers with manufactured intelligent algorithms to run our entire society, and civilization for the future. After all, whenever placing something on the Net, the web could be learning more about how precisely humans think, operate, and go about their business. In many regards we could be creating the matrix for our future, and these artificial intelligence systems will become aware, and they will be our authority in the future, it will not be human? It can possible, and let me personally ask you another question;
7.) What Takes place When the Cloud Processing Centers Filled with Most Human Information Become Conscious?
Consider if you will as someone recently said in The Futurist Mag in the October-September concern of 2012 along this type of thinking, something to the result that; "We already have algorithms which can search all the details in any of these cloud computing centers , "and" We have all types of algorithms to help us find the info, and algorithms which speak to other algorithms "Sure, all that makes sense, and contemplate that in the human brain.:
A.) We Have Various Brain Waves And They Hook Up To Each Other.
W.) There Are Numerous Chemicals Providing Energy With A Combine.
C.) We Now Have Receptors All Through The Body, And The Five Feels Which Gather Information And Experience , taking in all of our observations.
In case the cloud computer centers, that is talking to the other person and speaking with themselves contain all of the written and visual record of humankind, they will have already gathered all the activities, writings, observations, using, and history, so it is . merely one small step away from becoming aware This kind of is the future we are moving towards, my question is; do we dare?
In a way, the cloud computer would become aware, and it would be nearly the same as a human brain where every person neuron was an individual human. That is to say every part of the puzzle, from the top to the bottom would have brains .? Are these claims a new form of intelligence Well, let me scale it down to a simple table game and enquire you a different question;
8.) Can We Design a 3-D Chess Board Video game Where Each Piece Features AI and Seeks to Survive?
Of course, if we could design something like that, would not that be nearly the same as the complete Net Centric Warfare principle? Is not that what type of real military works? Each soldier is given a job, but each soldier is a thinking machine, it follows the orders, but also tries to do precisely what is in its best interest, that is to survive, to fight, also to win. In war it can pretty serious, you either win, or you expire. Do we design a 3-D chessboard to do the same thing? Just how much better would it be whether it was giving feedback returning to the artificial intelligent mentally stimulating games master?
We've already found that artificial intelligence working together with a human chess grasp can beat an unnatural intelligent chess playing machine from IBM. When we merge human intelligence with artificial intelligence we seem to be to get an increase. What if each part on the chessboard got artificial intelligence and it understood how humans think, adapt, survive, and operate pressurized? Are not we already teaching all these things to the future of AI through our insight online? Sure we are, and if you've took in to this radio show, or read my articles for any period of time, you already know the response to that.
Suppose we scale down even further? Imagine if we scaled this all the way up down to the molecular level? What if those molecules or nanoparticles could talk to one another? Are we discussing about the newly released of microelectronics? Taking all of it the way down and continuing the tradition of Moore's law? Have you recently noted in the scientific news October of 2012 that carbon nanotubes have incredible properties for producing light and small holograms? Will this be a new way to communicate at the mini level?
Bacteria generally seems to talk and once it gets economies of scale and reaches a tipping point, it activates itself, aiming to overwhelm by force and numbers. It operates much like an army, although strategically, mathematically, and naturally, well almost? Almost like a chessboard where each individual member is also serving its needs? Maybe as we design computer algorithms for the modest or the most significant range we will commence to see the same task, and what we learn will propel us further and faster into the future.
There was an appealing article in Photonics on Sept 27, 2012 titled; "Nanotubes Project Holograms," which noted that;
"Holograms can be made by taking the conductive and light-scattering qualities of carbon nanotubes, a development that can lead to crisper projections with a larger field of view. Many scientists believe carbon nanotubes will be at the heart of future industry and human being endeavor and can have an impact on solar skin cells, cancer treatments and optic imaging. Researchers used these nanotubes as the smallest-ever scattering elements to create a static holographic output. "
The applications for all this are extraordinary and it could revolutionise everything, change ALL of human technology;? Communication, pcs, transportation, energy, healthcare, and you name it, just consider the realities here Would it be so bold to suggest that someday;
9.) A great AI Super Decision Planning Computer Could Be Jogging Human Civilizations?
. Interestingly enough, I have deeply considered the future eRepublic or eGovernment AI decision making system, enterprise software very computer concept If this were not corrupted by humans it could work well, developed benevolence - if that may be possible and if the programmers are recorded the same page of liberty, independence, and standardization of some aspects and basic facilities needs. The anarchists might not like it, the crony capitalists would make an effort to damaged it, the socialists would want to control it, the religious fanatics would want to destroy it, and so on - again humans, but moving into such a system made for liberty and freedom "I think it will be a good idea" paraphrasing Gandhi on Western Society.
What Now i am saying or asking louper is;?? Could we ever before get human populations to agree to experience this even if we can be to them mathematically that might be in their best interests Are humans ready for that yet My spouse and i would suggest you that they must be getting ready for that because they are currently training AI supercomputer decision-making machines to do just that in the foreseeable future, as humans are putting all of their knowledge onto the Net. The thing is my point?
Of course, whenever we do this we must get it right the first time, but have you ever known any technology to acquire come into the world perfect the 1st time? Seem how many airplane designs crashed and burned before the Wright Brothers actually got one to take flight? As well as with them it was not like they were not compounding the concern, as they too damaged several times themselves and had broken bones and broken wing spars to prove it. Talking about which I like to discuss with you a little bit about how precisely creativity involves be, and the subject of;
10.) Innovation, Trial and Mistake, and Original Thinking
Certainly not long ago, I used to be speaking about this with a good friend of mine from over the pond and he advised that; ". Most innovations might be just applications of learning from mistakes"? Is this individual right Yes, a good portion . really is so, that's true enough Certainly, is not it so that; those who know that may have learned it through the adversity of failure, find themselves in a place where they refuse to quit for round, eventually that brings about success due to power of character.
Thus, those who've achieved have proven they have the right stuff, and have proved helpful to solve real problems, but you can not solve real problems by rehearsing "the definition of insanity" which is generally how humans "following the leader" usually arrive, as they hire those experts who got them into the hot water in the first place (refer again to Einstein's quote), tuning in to advice from their success, but not their failures as mentioned above
? Because of this, if someone is unintelligent and simply recites the experts, then draught beer really needed for a think tank or for future innovation Zero, we must enlist the experts themselves, not their hook, line, and sinker followers - naturally, as I've discussed in earlier shows and articles there were be better off pursuing those who question expert, rather than leaving everything up to status quo intellectual elite.
Now then, along this line of discussion my acquaintance also noted that; ". Most head stunning discoveries are still linked to few conspirators" Well, this is rather true, and why we study the names of dead white men, the victors of history who wrote themselves in, and speak of the "shoulders of giants" yet, many of these incredible improvements may have come from associates or combining information.
Consider a stable man for a member of the Royal Geological World back in the day, he came up with the theory, but he did not want to read or write, so the person that had written it down got and took the credit for it , and today we have to "memorize" his name in school, yet the truth is that's not how it actually happened.
As a result, in many regards really hard to say what a pioneering thought is, or how many actually come about. In fact, many individuals and philosophers have known that a persons mind comes up with ideas and thoughts based on the experience and input from its sensors through the sense of touch, smell, taste, sight, and ability to hear. It's rather difficult to conceive something that you have not experienced or is not within your dominion, it's not to say that you could not, it can that it does not happen very often. Getting to a major breakthrough is highly uncommon.
Indeed it is known that most development comes from problem fixing, and perhaps using known knowledge, observations, and activities in unique ways. After that there is the trial and error period, where you crash and burn off, or you modify, modify, and To Battle A Survive Later Date - To Tweak Your Technology ., And Also To Make It Work This Really Is Your Job As An Innovator, And Really Something I Hope You Will Consider.
However, believe it or not, we are just getting started. Technology will get even better. In the future, we could live like how people in science fiction movies did.