In recent years, The Economist has attracted much attention as an international well-known news weekly. However, as people have increasingly higher requirements for media reports, some voices begin to question the ability and professionalism of the authors of the Economist. In this article, we will explore this issue in depth, challenge the authority, and seek out the truth. Some have pointed out that the authors of the Economist are not professional in some areas. Some reports may lack in-depth professional knowledge and understanding of the local culture and history, leading to one-sidedness and error of the report content. For example, some reports of economic or political dynamics in developing countries have been accused of ignoring basic facts and background, demonstrating the inadequacy of the authors. Some readers are concerned about the position and bias of the authors of The Economist article. They believe that some reports may be influenced by political, commercial or other factors, leading to less objective and neutral reporting. In this case, the professionalism and objectivity of the author have been questioned.