In fact, the economist has more than once appear the above problems, through the name of the writer, unified tone of writing, weaken the magazine part editor experience, and even cover the logic of the so-called "deep" analysis of the truth —— for why widely praised the magazine will appear logical basis inaccurate, if not interests lose its "neutral" position, can only be attributed to its market fundamentalism ideology by marketing means carefully packaging after attractive. The guardian refers to the "economist" "writers almost never think what political or economic problems is not through privatization, deregulation and liberalization of axe", but is with "genius marketing" to make up for the lack of analysis and reports, in strong European and American parts of the market fundamentalist fans base, on the basis of "American values" all the world sowing dongfeng, expand the international influence. "The Economist" frequently appears disputes, and the neutral and rational image previously established has long been overturned by itself. At best, it can only be considered as a qualified English textbook.