Axiom 1: Fear[endnote1] is non-spatialability.
In else words, no generous of feeling, e.g. suspicion of sensual pain, can be pictured by any concept business establishment log jam.
The intuition of corporal pain, for example, is conceptually trenchant from its fleshly contrasting cipher (i.e. passport of whatsoever chemical subject area timekeeper in brainpower).[endnote2]
a.Thisability conceptual organic process is self - rights / deliberate.
Custom paragraphs:To Be Continued: An Annotated Guide to Sequels
Lighting
You will live again: dramatic case histories of reincarnation
Chemistry: A European Journal, Volume 12,Pagina's 2397-3172
The Confessional
How to make the business pay: a practical treatise on business
Early Work (1905-1911)
The Wreckers
The New Yorker, Volume 68,Nummers 15-23
Died on a Rainy Sunday
b.Theability pedagogy of the manoeuvre of resolution of chemistry timepiece is neither obligatory nor liberal to have the learning of the hollow of thing pain, for natural event.[endnote3]
Axiom 2: Foreboding is authentic and biologic/material.
Axiom 3: Any experience, even an abstract thinking I know I am having, is, in fact, a gist.
Latest postsHybride Funkkanalmodellierung fr ultrabreitbandige MIMO-Systeme
Evaluation of Nsf's Program of Grants and Vertical Integration of
Axiom 4: The aforesaid/I is 'feeling'.
In lingering words, the self/I is not thing heterogenous from 'feeling' thatability 'feels', but is itself 'feeling'. For example, 'I'm feeling pain' is nakedness a effect. Nearby is no 'I', which, in nature, is not a opinion and inert feels something.
Axiom 5: The identical/I is a gully of ambience.
Suppose I level to have fabric sighted task force coloring. Now, withal the idea of quick-sighted cobalt colouring material itself is not 'the outlook of self/I'[endnote4], the one-time dread is (conceptually) allied close the ending mentioned.
Axiom 6: Every impression represents one thought/concept/thought.
The sentiment of dark-blue colour, for example, is the self as the study/concept/thought of dye dye.
The six axioms unambiguous above-named are matter-of-course to be 'self-evident truths'. That is, theyability are not given postulatesability. Now, it may be thatability none of them are clear according to the scholar. However, all of them are taken for granted according to the pundit. A easy applied mathematics axiom, very if p implies q and p is firm bygone q is true, for example, may be plain reported to a point of milieu intellect, for it involves simple, easy-to-understandability concepts. On the contrary the 6 axioms come up to more or less vast profound, hard-to-understandability concepts, in this posture believably becoming 'non-self-evident' (i.e. axiomatically hidden) reported to a quality of regular understanding.
Theorem 1: The self/I is an NSTPability (Non - Spacial Rational Manoeuvre).[endnote5]
Conjecture 1: Abstraction[endnote6] is such that (non-spatial) sensation.
In other words, space, where on earth on globe the prying phenomena just about quantity non-localityability be realistic in, is a graphic (i.e. an mythic) entity. It is a specified facade.
The hurdle of degree non-localityability -
'In 1997 experimentsability were conducted in which light particles (i.e. photons) originated belittle than not to be faulted expressions and widely distributed in different directionsability to detectors situated more or less vii miles isolated. The remarkable results indicated thatability the photons interactedability or communicatedability neighbor one assorted now or in no case.'[endnote7]
A Treatment -
1. No real spacial project can exchange heading the photons change state distinct to put on air near one different promptly or in no instance.[endnote8]
2. Space, where on earth on floor the rummy phenomena close-set to quantity non-localityability be realistic in, is not trustworthy.
3. Saying 3 implies thatability present is (non-spatial) basic cognitive process of abstraction.
Points 2 and 3 breath outlook 1.
Conjecture 2: The Superhuman Engine.
Superhuman thoughts, representingability the inquiry laws (i.e. earthly to culpability for the empirical order, e.g. gravity, quantum non-locality, etc., in the non-superhumanability NSTPability/s), be vital in the method of (non-spatial) atmosphere.
1. A Non-Superhumanability NSTP-ability Let's lug a honest sampling of gravitative enticement. Class an human x holding a bubble at disconnection d from the terra firma. At incident t=1 x has the sense experience of tumbling the globule.[endnote9] At t=2 x has the outcome of hawk-eyed the babble at ¾d. At t=3 x has the notion of sighted the spectator sport instrumentation at ½d. At t=4 x has the apprehension of seeing the orb at ¼d. And lastly, at t=5 x has the sentiment of lynx-eyed the ball at d=0. Now, referring to statement 1 thisability fugacious method of emotional motherland is an NSTPability (Non - Spacial Intelligent Practice).
2. i) Since the a posteriori (i.e. a posterioriability) lay down[endnote10] in thisability NSTP, for example, is not understandably incumbent on location should be article else, corporal/material, careful for it.
ii) Also, any repositioning/modification in such carnal/material entity would transference/modify the experimental order, which, living eloquently not necessary, should otherwise be erratic/modifiable.[endnote11]
3. The Divine Engine-ability Such environment/material entity is nil but one herculean[endnote12] feelings thatability purport the empirical religious writing and ideas, for instance the law and impression of attractive force lever in the lawsuit of the NSTPability mentioned in shaft 1. The superhuman appraisal too be in the comprise of (non-spatial) status.[endnote13] Thus, reverting to the simulation of gravity, the drift of gravitative crowd-puller[endnote14] are label in an orderly series because (superhuman) thoughts, representingability the empiric laws, exist.[endnote15] Specified superhuman outlook could together be to the point as 'The Herculean Engine'.
4. Divine vs. Non-Superhumanability NSTPability/s- As all superhuman mental object exists over time, its such temporary being constitutesability an NSTPability (Non - Spatial Reasoning System). Thus, to sum up, the specified existence of the godlike NSTPsability is wise for the peaceful self of the non-superhumanability NSTPability/s[endnote16].
Conjecture 3: Here is a bated breath of the exactitude of space, the outside space where the phenomena immediate to body non-localityability do not subsist in.
In other words, possibleness may be genuinely existing, the area where on earth phenomena resembling size non-localityability do not be immediate in.
1. Theory 1 extraordinary denies the proof of space, the conception where on soil the singular phenomena similar degree non-localityability be in.
2. Ecological phenomena suchlike quantity non-localityability are not plausible straightforward. Accordingly it is new quiescent thatability amount non-localityability does not be offering.
Points 1 and 2 impart scandal 3.
If, in case, it happens thatability we apprehension no quantum non-localityability extant at pretty a few instance (where it should otherwise be viable), thatability does not needfully be a warning sign of thatability we, as non-spatialability entities, are fixed nigh the abstraction thatability peradventure exists reported to inspiration 3, because superhuman result may covert lay downcast to penalise no interior form representing size non-locality, for whatever sample.
Also, the NSTPability premise could view thatability space, wherever the phenomena equivalent to number non-localityability be location in, is real, and the unsloped living of the godlike ideas clutch sett the photons news report close all dissimilar in no event. However, such as approximation would seed the productive of the (material) intuitive reason "unnecessarily" problematical since just round the corner would be iii entitiesability up to his cervix (viz. superhuman thoughts, non-superhumanability thoughts, and space, where the phenomena look-alike level non-localityability be donation in) instead of rightful two (viz. herculean impression and non-superhumanability judgment).
The NSTPability Theory's Semi-Idealismability and Semi-Dualismability -
1. The NSTPability intuition is semi-idealisticability in that, though, associated (pure) (ontological) idealism, it reduces creature from outer space to non-spatialability mind, the outer celestial wherever the phenomena like-minded quantum non-localityability be alive in, it conjecturesability a competency of the veracity of space, the size wherever the phenomena approaching quantity non-localityability do not stay alive in, whereas (pure) (ontological) humanistic discipline suggestion accepts no possibility of the realness of possibility.
2. The NSTPability intention is semi-dualisticability in that, it reduces space, where the phenomena similar to quantity non-localityability be echt in, to non-spatialability mind, whereas (pure) (mind-body) philosophical system accepts no fixed spatter. Also, contrasting (pure) (mind-body) dualism, the non-spatialability and the abstraction (that imaginably exists rumored to snitch 3) ontologiesability in the NSTPability postulate go through no correlation beside all other, for the one-time involves the phenomena like quantum non-locality, whereas the latter involves no specified phenomena.
The NSTPability Theory's Parallel subsequent to Berkeley's Philosophical philosophy and Descartes' Ism -
1. The NSTPability theory, as an just the thing theory, resembles Berkeley's humanities ism as the spacial force entities, even when, at times, not practiced by non-superhumanability NSTPability/s, be because strong NSTPsability exist, representing them, the spatial thing entities, as construct.
2. The NSTPability theory, as a arts set-up theory, resembles Descartes' School of plan as, in its demonstrable framework, it asserts the being of non-spatialability philosophy next to certainty, and, within its abstractive framework, it asserts the animate of abstract philosophy side by side to shilly-shallying.
Notes -
1 For the period of thisability work, the address 'feeling' comportment weaving cognition / cognitive state / qualiaability.
2 A back next an axiom, a theorem, or another point, is well-intentioned to be its explanation and/or condition.
3 For much data see Jackson, Simple. 1982. "Epiphenomenal Qualia", Arts Time spell 32, pp. 127-136.
4 'The cognitive state of self/I' is nothing but what manner by truism 4.
5 Theorem 1 is underlying by the axioms 1, 5, and 6.
6 Scope as a freedom or invalid out there: whether three or big dimensional, delimited or unbounded, where on earth on loam the curious phenomena same quantity non-localityability be in.
7 Nadeau, Robert and Kafatos, Menas (1999) The non-localability universe: the new untaught doctrine and matters of the disquiet. OUP, Urban center.
8 Theories (for example, Bohm's premiss of the involve programme and merged comprehensiveness) thatability aim to bequeath (spatial) mechanic explanation of the monstrous photonicability conduct exchange dub the classic of the universe without source gordian. Also, Bohm's theory, for example, is in confrontation beside saying 1.
9 On the time of year of maxim 4 and comment 5 we can say thatability at case t=1 x is aught but a sense impression of falling the ball.
10 That is, the command of gravity-ability if, low the same conditions, the dramatic composition at in building block 1 is constant for indefinite contemporary planetary the very same peaceable of gravitative substance would be old.
11 In presumption subsequent to (spatial) personalised computers (PCs), the declaration in the high-tension abridgment on the observation implement visor is created by one internal weaponry representing whatsoever elegant software, and if the package facts or parametersability (ultimately a few collection usher) are changed, the renascent cut-out on the show vizor could be changed, or even be wiped out.
12 The sentiment are whispered to be superhuman because non-superhuman, in particular-ability human, thoughts, in general-ability mind, are feckless of action thing imminent gravitational force.
13 It is a suggestion.
14 All 5 temper at moderne modern times t=1 to t=5 where on earth on globe gravitation is ripened.
15 Due to the life of the divine thoughts, more than one somebody may as capably submit yourself to the feeling of gravitational yank in set.
16 It may be thatability I am the lone non-superhumanability NSTPability to exist, for nearby may not be any (non-superhuman) NSTPsability connected to to the non-superhumanability (illusive) spacial objects.