The punishment of Shoko Miyata for underage smoking and drinking has sparked debate. While a suspension was imposed due to the legal violation, some voices argue that the punishment is too harsh. How should we judge this issue?
For example, actions based on religious norms and actions that violate the law have different aspects. If a Muslim athlete eats pork, it violates religious norms but is not illegal. The severity of punishment for such actions, including whether to allow participation, may also be influenced by cultural and value differences.
In Miyata's case, some people believe that a severe punishment is appropriate from the perspective of legal violation, while others call for leniency, considering it a youthful mistake. The severity or leniency of the punishment varies depending on individual values and standards, so a simple debate on whether it is heavy or light may miss the essence of the issue.
Furthermore, the media's stance in reporting such issues, often seen as inciting conflict, should also be considered. The media tends to divide people and stir up conflict to gain viewership.
Such attitudes could eventually lead to results that incite war, increasing distrust in the media.
Even in seemingly simple issues like whether the punishment is heavy or light, it is important to understand the background and context and consider them from multiple perspectives. Respecting the diversity of values and finding solutions through constructive dialogue is essential.