直哉②

for

We can have more chances to do it in only four years. It is because would-be teachers must study their special field of study, such as English, social science and so on in university, so we cannot learn other subjects, such as child psychology. Teachers who cannot understand feelings of students are increasing now because of lack of education. I think that a six-year teacher-training program can prevent such teachers.


反駁はたぶん溝下さんのでいいと思う(--;)

タカ2

<Against>

～it is very difficult for universities to have enough staffs for 6 year teaching programme～

If the 6-year teaching programme is introduced, the number of teachers at universities wouldn't be enough to run the teaching programme. In addition to this, it is very unrealistic to increase the number of staffs enough until 2012. Even though the universities could get enough staffs, it is unsure if they can get good quality teachers.

<Objection>（反論）

So, you are saying that because of lack of the number of staffs, this teaching programme cannot be done.

i understand your opinion. Then, what about wait until the number of staffs are enough and start the 6-year teaching programme? Is it OK?

ひ か

★）Againstの意見

Six-year teacher traning program takes much time and a lot of money. I think we can study enough to be a teacher during university and there are no guarantee to be a teacher if you study for six years. In addition I think it is more important to experience at the real working place than studing. To go to university and graduate school will be hard and a burden for people who want to be a teacher. Because of this program, the number of applicants of people who want to be a teacher will decrease. By the way, the plan of taking one year to practice teaching may be a good idea, but thare are some problems. For example, it is up to schools to accept practice teaching. Anyway, I think the person who really wants to be a teacher will become a teacher is the best way. If those people can't do it because of this program, I think it does not make sense.