I found some new applicants which have do some promotions according to iPad Retina Display Screen, some applicants and some games. Those who have reactions in time could be called the leaders in their fields. These applicants are also the main products on iPad platform, so it is necessary for them to do some instant promotion for strengthening their mainstream role.
Some applicants are 2D and to some extent small usual applicants, while others are large games installing packs reaching hundreds of MB or even to several G. The only way for 2D applicants to make themselves HD, to remake all the elements that UI needed. Usually, designers only need to promote their pictures' resolution again, then the work is done, but if they really design their applicants according to 1024*768, then they could do nothing but to rebuild it again.
There is no much advantages for 3D applicants comparing to 2D ones. Some not kind of delicate and complex games could adopt running algorithm to enable themselves operated on new iPad without much updating. Some simple geometry among big scale games like those listed above could adopts running algorithm, while those are stricted to details such as figure models still needs mapping. So if you want some more delicate image quality on the new iPad, it must be improved.
■HD applicants popularized slowly, other producers enjoy the fruits
In connection with the problem of little HD applicants, I believe it would be more difficult for cheap Android tablets to introduce it into software market if Apple could hardly do that. What’s more, ARM Window 8 system is not much better than it. Some people ask: applicants on 1080P monitor what we are using now can regularly runs, can’t it?
Then I would like to take my monitor for example, which is 23inch, 1080P. Its PPI only reaches 96, while the screen PPI of new iPad reaches 264. That is to say, if what are displayed on my screen is removed to new iPad, it only takes one third of the screen. Can you imagine how large the starting keypad is when both height and wide became one third of the original one? Tiny things like this should not be easy to control, so if you want to give consumers better experiences, you need to rebuild it.
So producers of cheap windows tablets or cheap android tablets now not only waiting for Android and Win 8 pushing out their counter-plan, but also waiting for Apple urging producers of applicant to take actions to promote applicant’s resolution. So most of them are planning to transplant applicants on iOS directly when most applicant producers are nearly finishing their promotion, what they should do was just promoting their own screen resolution.
Tablet PC is quite suitable for people to go through web sites as a touch control product. New iPad promotes its resolution to 2048×1536, means its declare that if webmasters do not take reactions, they’d be eliminated by the market. I believe many people are using 1080P monitor to read this article. So don’t you think the blank space on two sides is kind of wasting? Actually we could enlarge the words and pictures to make them clear, but taking old monitors into consideration, we have to bear these web sites of 1024 R.P. So personally speaking, I think web sites need revolution now.
Then why do I say it is more serious on iPad? Because monitors we use has large size, even we put a web site of 1024 in the middle of the screen, we could still read it clearly. If putting this on iPad, only with the help of magnifier could we read it. Thus those sharing web sites can provide readers better experience quickly push out suitable screen for iPad, while those old traditional web sites would be changed greatly. If not, then being eliminated!
■Radiating problem must be solved, Win 8 has not much pressure
As to radiating problem, the irresponsible performance of new iPad has confused me. Why would a company with such perfect art director did not realize this problem while texting? After all, the temperature of new iPad has surpassed all digital products on the market at the moment. What is the reason? I suggest these as follows:
1. Adopting Retina Display Screen, making the display core over-worked.
2. Low resolution applicants need enlarging algorithm when displayed on HD screen, processor over-worked.
3. Cell capacity expanded, while thickness not increased much, making the inner body radiating space decreased
4. iOS system per se.
In a word, the radiating problem of new iPad is because inner heat generation is too much and radiating is not well done. Then other producers should considerate this problem seriously. I suggest Android would take the same methods as iPad, regardless of radiating problem, so Win 8 ARM tablet would also adopts passive radiating design.
■Applicants loading becomes slow, storage processor still needs strengthened
Apart from two big problems listed above, another serious problem is that we could find the loading speed of iOS applicants and games becomes slower. The reason is that the screen resolution of new iPad is promoted, so more pixels are needed to fill into it, which leads that more data would be loaded before we started an applicant or a game. Apple’s promotion of processor only demonstrates promotion of displaying core, which needs more time to prepare the contents.
So other producers must pay attention to promoting processor and storage promoting when they producer their tablet pcs. Do not forget file loading speed only for promoting display core and screen.
Well, my word stops here. I really hope the radiating problem of Apple just because not enough system optimization, and hope designers of applicant and web sites could hurry up to brings us new visual experiences.
News source: www.lenteen.com