Juan Rodulfo
Amebaホームピグアメブロ
芸能人ブログ人気ブログ
新規登録
ログイン

Juan Rodulfo

Juan Rodulfo is a Venezuelan technologist, author, publisher, and multimedia creator in exile. With more than a decade of experience across digital publishing, investigative nonfiction, cultural research, and AI assisted content production

次ページ >>

The "Orange Plague" Statue

The "Orange Plague" is a satirical, gold-leaf-covered sculpture of Donald Trump, created by Danish artist Jens Galschiøt and organized for exhibition by Danish MEP Per Clausen. It went on display inside the European Parliament building in Strasbourg

France, on Tuesday, Oct. 6, 2026, and is scheduled to remain there only until Thursday, Oct. 8. The roughly 2.5-meter (8-foot) work — also billed as "King of Injustice" — depicts a nude Trump seated on the back of a smaller figure, clutching a long golf club and the scales of justice.

Key takeaway: A Danish artist's traveling protest sculpture has landed in one of the world's most visible democratic institutions — and it is scheduled to stay for just a few days, making the display as much a statement about political satire and free expression as about its subject.

What is the "Orange Plague" statue?

"The Orange Plague" is a gold-covered satirical sculpture of U.S. President Donald Trump, made by Danish sculptor Jens Galschiøt. It went on display inside the European Parliament in Strasbourg on Tuesday, Oct. 6, 2026, organized by Danish MEP Per Clausen, and it is scheduled to remain on view until Thursday, Oct. 8.

Key facts about the work itself:

  • Artist: Jens Galschiøt, a Danish sculptor born in 1954 and best known for the "Pillar of Shame" series. He works from a large workshop and gallery in Odense, Denmark.
  • Size and materials: About 2.5 meters (roughly 8 feet) tall, covered in 23-karat gold leaf.
  • Alternate title: The piece is also presented as "King of Injustice."
  • First appearance: It was created for the COP30 United Nations climate summit in Belém, Brazil, in November 2025, and has since appeared in public several times — including at the Munich Security Conference.
  • Setting: Strasbourg is the European Parliament's official seat, and the sculpture is on display inside the Parliament building as part of a temporary exhibition this week.

Why it's at the European Parliament — and why it matters worldwide

The exhibition was organized by Per Clausen, a left-wing Danish member of the European Parliament, who invited the artist to bring the work to Strasbourg. According to the organizers' announcement, Clausen argues that the Parliament is a fitting stage for the sculpture's message, given the questions it raises about the direction of U.S. policy and the global order.

That decision turned a Danish art project into a global news story within hours — coverage spread across at least three continents in a single day, from CNN and USA Today to DW, The Independent, The Straits Times, and The Times of India. Images of American political power circulate worldwide, and different places read them differently.

Three threads explain the global relevance:

  1. A sitting U.S. president, exhibited in a foreign legislature. It is unusual for a work this pointed about a serving head of state to be displayed inside a major international institution — and the imagery travels instantly on social platforms.
  2. Political satire as a test case. How democratic institutions handle provocative art — hosting it, restricting it, or arguing about it — is watched closely far beyond Europe. Galschiøt's own best-known work, the "Pillar of Shame," was taken down in Hong Kong, and the artist says he has been fighting to recover it. The contrast between venues that show and venues that silence is part of the story.
  3. Climate politics. The sculpture was born as a critique tied to U.N. climate negotiations, and it re-enters public view at a time when environmental policy remains a central axis of transatlantic debate.

What the sculpture shows and means

The sculpture depicts a naked Donald Trump seated on the back of a smaller, thin figure who appears to buckle under his weight. One hand clutches a long golf club; the other holds the scales of justice. A golf ball rests alongside. In its earlier public displays, the figure stood on a pedestal bearing the words "The Orange Plague."

The artist's own framing is explicit. On his website, Galschiøt describes the work as "a satirical out-cry against Trump and the U.S. assault on the green transition and the rule-based world order." His site also includes a short poem that begins: "With his eyes closed and scales in hand, the Orange Plague proclaims: I am sitting on the back of a man. He is sinking under my burden."

The imagery draws on several recognizable references:

  • The "naked emperor." The work echoes the fairy tale "The Emperor's New Clothes" — a leader exposed by his own vanity.
  • The gilded idol. The 23-karat gold coating plays on Trump's well-documented fondness for gold. Galschiøt told CNN: "Trump likes gold. In a way, I think he would like this sculpture."
  • The burden. The smaller figure personifies the people carrying the costs of power, a metaphor the artist repeats in interviews. Asked what he would tell the president face to face, Galschiøt told HuffPost: "Get off our backs."
  • Laughter as resistance. "Dictators don't like you laughing at them," Galschiøt has said, explaining why he makes protest art instead of policy papers.

Benefits and opportunities

For supporters, the Strasbourg display illustrates several genuine benefits:

  • Satire as civic speech. Political satire has a long, protected tradition in democracies; parliaments are among the most appropriate places to encounter dissent and criticism, not only agreement.
  • A spotlight on policy debates. The sculpture directs attention to the specific arguments its creator cares about — climate policy, the rule of law, and the responsibilities of powerful states — the kind of attention that a press release rarely achieves.
  • Institutional self-testing. By hosting a challenging artwork, the Parliament demonstrates the difference between debating criticism and suppressing it — a contrast the artist himself emphasizes.
  • Visibility for Danish and European political culture. A Danish MEP and a Danish artist reached a global audience, showing smaller countries can shape international conversations.
  • A live civics lesson. Visitors and staff get a first-hand example of how democratic institutions handle uncomfortable speech.

Risks and trade-offs

The same display carries real costs and questions, acknowledged even by its organizers:

  • Provocation and diplomacy. Some observers argue that exhibiting a mocking depiction of a sitting U.S. president risks inflaming diplomatic relations. Clausen acknowledged this view directly: "I know some people think we shouldn't provoke Trump and therefore shouldn't exhibit a sculpture like this," he said in a statement.
  • Polarization. Satire aimed at one side of a divided electorate can harden positions rather than open debate; the nudity and the taunting title will read very differently depending on where viewers stand.
  • Institutional questions. The exhibition is organized by an individual MEP rather than as a Parliament-wide initiative — which raises the question of where the line runs between an institution's neutrality and its members' right to speak.
  • Backlash and thin skin. Clausen has said he is not worried about a reaction from the U.S. president, and offered a combative defense: "If someone is so thin-skinned that they cannot tolerate this sculpture being exhibited in the European Parliament, then they have no place on the world stage." Whether that confidence proves warranted is one of the open questions of the week.

Human impact

The most immediate human effect is conversational: the sculpture has generated sharply divided reactions in news commentary and on social media — praise as incisive satire, criticism as an insult dressed as art. Clausen said the response to the statue has been positive among those engaging with it, though that reflects his own perspective as its host.

Groups affected in different ways:

  • MEPs and parliamentary staff encounter the work directly during the session week — some as a statement they welcome, others as an embarrassment in their workplace.
  • The artist gains a global platform, but also criticism; his career has shown both the reach and the risk of protest art (his "Pillar of Shame" was removed in Hong Kong, and he says he is still fighting to recover it).
  • Ordinary viewers are invited, through the smaller burdened figure, to see themselves as the subjects of the artwork's metaphor: the people who carry costs imposed from above.
  • Supporters and opponents of the U.S. president may find their prior views reinforced rather than challenged — the common fate of political caricature.

The display's real-world footprint on daily life is modest — its significance is civic and symbolic rather than economic or physical. It aims to shift how people talk about power; whether it does is unresolved.

Planetary impact

The sculpture's direct environmental footprint appears small and is not publicly documented: one gilded object that has traveled from Denmark to a handful of venues in Brazil, Germany, and France. Gold leaf has real supply-chain costs, and long-distance art transport produces emissions — but no figures have been published for this work, so precise footprint claims would be speculation.

Honest framing:

  • What we know: The work was created as a critique of what the artist calls the assault on the green transition — its environmental significance is chiefly symbolic and political.
  • What we don't know: Materials sourcing, weight, and shipping details are undocumented; treat specific environmental claims about the statue itself with caution.
  • The balanced view: A single artwork is not an environmental crisis in either direction — it is a message about environmental policy, delivered through a modest physical object.

What to do next

Practical, lawful, and useful steps — whether you support the message, oppose it, or just want the facts:

  1. If you're in or near Strasbourg and hope to see it: confirm details with official sources before traveling. The display is scheduled to remain only until Oct. 8, and access to the Parliament building runs through the European Parliament's visitor arrangements.
  2. Read the primary materials: the artist's page for the work and the organizers' announcement give the fullest versions of the statements that media reports quote in fragments.
  3. Separate claims from facts when sharing. The sculpture is the artist's opinion in physical form; the display dates, organizer, and title are the verifiable news core.
  4. Follow the next chapter. Galschiøt's works travel — the "Orange Plague" appeared at COP30 and the Munich Security Conference before Strasbourg, and further stops have not been ruled out.
  5. For educators and journalists: use the sources listed below, and note that this piece involves nudity and political caricature — contextualize before presenting it to audiences.

FAQ

What is "The Orange Plague" statue?

It's a roughly 2.5-meter (8-foot) satirical sculpture of Donald Trump, covered in 23-karat gold leaf, created by Danish artist Jens Galschiøt. It is also presented under the title "King of Injustice" and is currently on display inside the European Parliament in Strasbourg.

Who organized its display at the European Parliament?

Danish MEP Per Clausen, a member of the left-wing Red-Green Alliance (part of the Left group in the Parliament), organized the exhibition and invited the artist, according to the organizers' announcement and multiple news reports.

Where exactly is the statue, and how long will it stay?

It is on display inside the European Parliament building in Strasbourg, France — the Parliament's official seat. It went on view Tuesday, Oct. 6, 2026, and is scheduled to remain on display only until Thursday, Oct. 8.

What does the sculpture depict?

A nude Donald Trump seated on the back of a smaller, thinner man who appears to struggle under the weight, holding a long golf club and the scales of justice. The artist describes it as satire aimed at Trump's record and rhetoric; the imagery deliberately echoes "The Emperor's New Clothes."

Why is the display controversial?

It combines nudity, mockery of a sitting head of state, and an institutional setting. Supporters call it legitimate political satire; critics call it a provocation that risks diplomatic friction. Even its organizer acknowledges that "some people think we shouldn't provoke Trump."

Did Trump or the White House respond?

As of Wednesday, Oct. 7, no response from the White House had been reported in the coverage reviewed. Clausen has said he is not worried about a reaction from the U.S. president.

Conclusion

At its core the story is straightforward: a Danish sculptor made a pointed, gilded satire; a Danish MEP brought it inside the European Parliament; it is scheduled to leave again on Thursday, Oct. 8. What makes it worth understanding is everything around those facts — how publics react to satire aimed at power, and how open institutions handle art some find embarrassing and others find brave. Keep the facts straight, take the arguments as arguments, and watch what happens next; the debates this piece started will outlast its visit to Strasbourg.

Sources and further reading

golden Trump statue European Parliament,naked Trump statue Strasbourg,Jens Galschiøt sculpture,King of Injustice statue,Per Clausen MEP exhibition,European Parliament art display, orange plague statue,golden trump statue,european parliament,strasbourg,jens galschiot,king of injustice,political satire,per clausen,cop30,world news,europe,

San Francisco Lawsuit Targets Makers of Doritos,

San Francisco Lawsuit Targets Makers of Doritos, Oreo, M&M’s and Kit Kat Over Alleged Health Harms

#UltraProcessedFoods #FoodLawsuit #ConsumerHealth #Doritos #Oreo #MandMs #KitKat #FoodSafety #PublicHealth #ProductLiability #SanFrancisco #HealthyEating

San Francisco, California — September 28, 2026 — The companies behind household brands including Doritos, Oreo, M&M’s and Kit Kat are among the defendants in a closely watched lawsuit alleging that major food manufacturers engineered, marketed and sold ultra-processed foods while concealing or minimizing alleged health risks.

The key point for readers: these are allegations in ongoing civil litigation, not findings that any individual snack product has been proven to cause a particular consumer’s medical condition. Still, the legal campaign has placed ultra-processed foods at the center of a growing debate about chronic disease, consumer transparency and corporate responsibility.

Download the Gorila Travel virtual agency from Google Play

The Lawsuit at a Glance

On December 2, 2025, San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu announced a lawsuit brought on behalf of the People of the State of California against major ultra-processed-food manufacturers. The action was filed in San Francisco Superior Court under California’s Unfair Competition Law and public-nuisance statutes. It seeks to stop allegedly deceptive marketing, require corrective actions, and obtain restitution and civil penalties intended in part to offset public-health costs.

The complaint names several companies connected to major snack and candy brands:

Brand Company named in complaint How it appears in the case
Doritos PepsiCo Doritos is listed among PepsiCo’s ultra-processed-food brands in the complaint.
Oreo Mondelez International Oreo is listed among Mondelez’s ultra-processed-food brands.
M&M’s Mars Incorporated M&M’s is listed among Mars’ ultra-processed-food brands.
Kit Kat Nestlé USA Kit Kats are listed among Nestlé’s ultra-processed-food brands.

The defendants also include Kraft Heinz, Post Holdings, Coca-Cola, General Mills, Kellanova, WK Kellogg, ConAgra Brands and others.

What San Francisco Alleges

San Francisco’s complaint makes broad allegations about the manufacture and marketing of ultra-processed foods, rather than presenting a separate medical-injury claim tied exclusively to Doritos, Oreo, M&M’s or Kit Kat.

The City alleges that manufacturers:

  • Designed ultra-processed foods to be highly palatable and encourage overconsumption.
  • Marketed products in ways that allegedly obscured or downplayed health risks.
  • Targeted children and, according to the complaint, disproportionately marketed to certain communities.
  • Contributed to public-health burdens associated with conditions including Type 2 diabetes, fatty liver disease, cardiovascular disease, colorectal cancer and depression.

The City Attorney’s Office defines ultra-processed foods as industrial formulations involving extensive processing and additives such as flavor enhancers, colors, emulsifiers, sweeteners, thickeners and other substances not typically used in ordinary home cooking. The complaint treats those processing methods—not merely a product’s calories, sugar, fat or sodium—as central to its theory.

That distinction matters. The lawsuit is not simply claiming that candy or chips are unhealthy in the ordinary sense. It alleges that the industry’s processing, product design, marketing and alleged failure to provide meaningful information created a broader public-health problem. The companies have not been found liable on those claims.

Medical-Damage Claims Face a High Bar

The emerging litigation has produced an important legal reality check: evidence of a population-level association between ultra-processed-food consumption and chronic disease does not, by itself, prove that a specific brand caused a specific person’s diagnosis.

In Martinez v. Kraft Heinz Company Inc. et al., a Philadelphia plaintiff alleged that consumption of products made by 11 food and beverage companies contributed to his Type 2 diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. On June 30, 2026, U.S. District Judge Mia Roberts Perez dismissed the amended complaint, ruling that it did not adequately plead product-specific, defendant-specific “but-for” causation.

The court recognized that the allegations raised “serious concerns” about ultra-processed foods and children’s health, but held that the plaintiff had not provided sufficient facts showing how each defendant or each product individually caused or contributed to his harm. The decision stressed that correlation is not enough under Pennsylvania law; plaintiffs must show legally sufficient causation.

That dismissal does not resolve San Francisco’s separate California action. It does show, however, why any individual medical-damages claim involving snacks, candy or other foods is likely to require substantial evidence, such as:

  • A documented medical diagnosis and treatment history.
  • Detailed evidence of long-term product consumption.
  • Purchase records, packaging or other proof identifying products and time periods.
  • Expert medical and scientific evidence addressing alternative causes.
  • A legal theory that connects the alleged injury to specific companies and products.

Why Doritos, Oreo, M&M’s and Kit Kat Matter

Doritos, Oreo, M&M’s and Kit Kat are high-recognition brands, which makes their appearance in the litigation especially newsworthy. But consumers should avoid a misleading conclusion: their inclusion does not mean that a court has determined any one of these products is medically defective or directly caused a particular illness.

Instead, the complaint identifies them as examples within brand portfolios allegedly covered by the City’s ultra-processed-food theory:

  • Doritos is associated with PepsiCo, one of the companies named in San Francisco’s complaint.
  • Oreo is associated with Mondelez International, also a named defendant.
  • M&M’s is associated with Mars Incorporated, a named defendant.
  • Kit Kat is associated with Nestlé USA, a named defendant.

The litigation may influence future discussions about product labeling, food marketing aimed at children, disclosure of processing practices and the health-care costs attributed to diet-related disease. But those outcomes remain uncertain and will depend on evidence, court rulings, potential settlements or legislative action.

What Consumers Should Know

Consumers concerned about diet-related health conditions should distinguish between legal allegations and personal medical guidance.

  1. Do not self-diagnose based on a lawsuit. A legal complaint is not a medical assessment, and no court has established that consuming a specific snack brand caused a particular person’s illness.
  2. Speak with a qualified clinician about individual health concerns. Diabetes, fatty liver disease, cardiovascular disease and other chronic conditions have multiple possible risk factors and should be evaluated by a licensed health professional.
  3. Keep records if you believe a product may be relevant to a claim. Medical records, receipts, store-loyalty data, packaging, photographs and a dated consumption history can be important if legal counsel later advises that a potential claim exists.
  4. Be cautious with payout claims. No general settlement fund or automatic compensation program has been established for consumers of Doritos, Oreo, M&M’s or Kit Kat based on the San Francisco lawsuit. The dismissed Martinez case also illustrates the difficulty of proving product-specific causation in personal-injury claims.
  5. Follow the case through reliable sources. Court filings, municipal announcements and reputable legal reporting are more dependable than viral social-media posts or lead-generation advertisements promising large payouts.

Editorial Note and Legal Disclaimer

This press-style report is based on publicly available litigation materials and reporting as of September 28, 2026. The claims described are allegations by San Francisco and other plaintiffs; defendants are entitled to contest them, and no liability should be assumed absent a court judgment or settlement.

This content is for news and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice, medical advice or a solicitation for legal services. Anyone concerned about a medical condition should consult a qualified health-care professional. Anyone considering a legal claim should consult a licensed attorney in the relevant jurisdiction.

ultra-processed food lawsuit, San Francisco food lawsuit, PepsiCo Doritos lawsuit, Mondelez Oreo lawsuit, Mars M&M’s lawsuit, Nestlé Kit Kat lawsuit, consumer medical damages, processed food health lawsuit,

Discover stunning aerial photography and coastal wall art prints by certified commercial drone pilot Juan Rodulfo. Elevate your home decor with high-quality, modern statement pieces starting at $27. Shop exclusive nature, aviation, and river landscapes today.

 

Instacart drivers payment vs Instacart profits

Instacart 2025 Profits vs a $5.68 Batch: The Real Math

Instacart (Maplebear Inc., NASDAQ: CART) reported GAAP net income of $447 million for full-year 2025, while a single shop-and-deliver batch offered to a shopper — shop dog food and toys for about 15 minutes, then drive 8.2 miles to the outskirts of St. Cloud, Florida, in 19 minutes — paid $5.68. At a $4.40 gas price and Florida's $14 minimum wage, that batch implies roughly $12.06 in direct vehicle costs before any pay for the shopper's time, meaning it costs more to complete than it pays. That gap, not one bad order, is what this article explains.

Key takeaway: Instacart's 2025 profitability ($447M GAAP net income) sits on top of a pay model where shoppers are independent contractors with no minimum-wage floor, so the platform's cost per order and the shopper's cost per order are not the same number — and on this batch they move in opposite directions.

Table of contents

What is the $5.68 batch problem?

A "batch" is one Instacart work offer: shop one or more customer orders and/or deliver them. Instacart states that batch pay "reflects the total expected effort it takes to complete a batch (including travel to the store and to the customer, quantity and weight of items, and expected time needed to shop the batch)" and that it "is based solely on job-related criteria, such as driving distance, number of items, and expected shopping time" Instacart — How do Shoppers earn?.

Download the Gorila Travel virtual agency from Google Play

Batch pay is separate from tips, which are 100% passed to the shopper, and shoppers are never penalized for declining a batch Instacart. The issue is not how batch pay is disclosed — it is disclosed upfront — but what it has to cover. The order in question asks the shopper to:

Batch element Detail
Work Shop dog food and toys, ~15 minutes
Drive 8.2 miles to St. Cloud, FL city outskirts, ~19 minutes at midday
Offered batch pay $5.68
Gas price assumption $4.40/gallon
Shopper gas cost (as stated) ~$1.80
Shopper car wear and tear (as stated) ~$10.26
Pay needed to equal Florida minimum wage ~$7.82–$7.93 (34 minutes at $14/hour)

On those inputs, the batch pays $5.68 while costing the shopper roughly $12.06 in gas plus wear before the shopper's own time is counted — a negative cash result of about –$6.38 before self-employment tax. Even the "labor only" comparison fails: $5.68 for 34 minutes works out to about $10.02/hour, below Florida's $14.00 minimum wage and below the $15.00 rate that takes effect on September 30, 2026 Florida Department of Economic Opportunity — Florida Minimum Wage; FRLA — Current Florida Minimum Wage.

Why Instacart pay math matters in the United States

Two numbers, published weeks apart, sit at the heart of the story.

The platform's number. Instacart reported full-year 2025 total revenue of $3,742 million, GAAP gross profit of $2,758 million, and GAAP net income of $447 million, down slightly from $457 million in 2024 SEC — Maplebear Inc. FY2025 Form 10-K. Transaction revenue represented 7.1% of gross transaction value (GTV), flat year over year CNBC — Instacart Q4 2025 earnings, and 2025 GTV was reported at roughly $37.2 billion Business of Apps — Instacart statistics. Instacart describes roughly 600,000 shoppers as of December 31, 2025 SEC — FY2025 Form 10-K. Q4 2025 adjusted EBITDA was about $303 million, up 20% year over year; a full-year 2025 adjusted EBITDA figure was not verified in this research and should not be published CNBC.

Download the Gorila Travel virtual agency from Google Play

The shopper's number. Because shoppers are independent contractors, they receive nothing for mileage, fuel, depreciation, insurance, or phone use. That is not a loophole; it is the legal structure. Under the FLSA, misclassification is only actionable if the worker is legally an employee; genuinely independent contractors sit outside minimum-wage, overtime, and workers' compensation protections U.S. Department of Labor — Misclassification of Employees as Independent Contractors. Human Rights Watch has argued to Instacart that the absence of minimum-wage protections is what allowed algorithmic base-pay calculation to spread, and that shoppers carry costs the platform does not Human Rights Watch — Letter to Instacart.

The pay floor itself has moved down over time. Instacart cut its minimum base pay from $7 to $4 in 2023 Business Insider; Supermarket News, and 2025-era coverage describes full-service minimums ranging from $7 to $10 in some markets against $5 for delivery-only batches RoadWarrior — Instacart Driver Pay 2025. Some jurisdictions have gone the other way — New York City has adopted minimum-pay rules for contracted grocery delivery workers, showing that a floor is legally achievable where policymakers choose it NYC Rules — Contracted Delivery Workers. A $5.68 offer for a 34-minute shop-and-deliver is not an anomaly in the current structure — it is inside it.

Benefits and opportunities

The gig model is not only a cost story, and a balanced reading has to say so.

  • Real earnings upside exists. Gridwise, analyzing 20,538 shoppers tracked in 2025, found a median of $12.21 per hour in total trip pay and an average of $12.93 per hour (batch pay plus tips) Gridwise — How Much Do Instacart Shoppers Make?. That is above this particular batch's ~$10.02/hour, which is exactly the point: batch-level math and platform-average math diverge sharply.
  • Flexibility is genuine. Shoppers choose when and how much to work, see pay upfront, can decline batches without penalty, and can access earnings quickly — instant cashout after a delivery, free auto-payouts via the Shopper Rewards Card, or weekly direct deposit Instacart.
  • Tips are protected in ways they often are not elsewhere. Shoppers keep 100% of tips, customers have 14 days to increase a tip, and Instacart covers zeroed-out tips up to $10 when no order issue is reported Instacart.
  • Low entry barriers. No employer interview, no schedule, no vehicle fleet — a phone and insulated bags (roughly $20–$30) are the minimum Gridwise.
  • Real tax advantages exist for high-mileage workers. Independent contractors can deduct business mileage — 70 cents per mile for 2025 IRS — Standard Mileage Rates, rising to 72.5 cents for 2026 IRS — 2026 business standard mileage rate — which is why any honest net-pay analysis must separate pre-tax cash from after-deduction income ExpenseBot — Instacart Shopper Taxes.

Risks and trade-offs

  • No wage floor. With no employee status, there is no hourly minimum for the 34 minutes of work in this batch; the ~$7.82–$7.93 "minimum-wage equivalent" is a benchmark for comparison, not a legal guarantee.
  • Unreimbursed vehicle costs. The batch's stated $10.26 wear-and-tear figure is far above the IRS's own 70¢/mile benchmark (about $5.74 for 8.2 miles, or $11.48 round trip), which suggests it was calculated on a round-trip or actual-cost basis rather than a one-way distance. Whether a shopper accounts it at $5.74 or $10.26 changes the batch's profitability, but not its sign: at either figure the batch loses money before tax.
  • Distance assumptions are ambiguous. The $1.80 gas cost is consistent with roughly one-way travel at about 20 mpg at $4.40/gallon; a round trip of 16.4 miles would roughly double it to about $3.60. Local driver reports near St. Cloud have cited pump prices around $4.04–$4.39, and Florida's statewide average has been near $4.46 AAA Fuel Prices, so the $4.40 input is realistic — but the one-way-versus-round-trip choice materially changes the result.
  • Deadhead and waiting time. Batch pay covers travel to the store and to the customer, but offers, declines, parking, and waiting are unpaid and are usually unmeasured in any per-order figure.
  • Classification litigation is live. Class actions allege that Instacart misclassified shoppers as independent contractors and failed to reimburse gas, mileage, and automobile expenses, arguing that the platform effectively received a "kickback" from unreimbursed costs ClassAction.org — Instacart misclassification. Whether those claims succeed, the economics they describe match the batch above.
  • Algorithmic opacity. Shoppers frequently report being unable to reconstruct how a given batch was priced, and scholars note that independent-contractor classification leaves gig workers outside the wage-and-hour framework that would otherwise force disclosure Wake Forest Law Review — Worker Classification in the Gig Economy.

Download the Gorila Travel virtual agency from Google Play

Human impact

The positive side is real: for roughly 600,000 shoppers, Instacart offers immediate, flexible earnings, fast payouts, and a lower entry barrier than most hourly jobs SEC — FY2025 Form 10-K; Instacart. For customers on the outskirts of St. Cloud, Florida — beyond easy walking distance of a full grocery assortment — the service can also be an access improvement.

The negative side concentrates on the person doing the work. A batch that pays $5.68 against ~$12.06 in stated vehicle costs means the shopper is, in effect, subsidizing the order through a depreciating asset. Over a week, that pattern compounds: vehicle depreciation, maintenance intervals that arrive faster than expected, and self-employment tax on gross pay rather than net. There is a distributional asymmetry worth naming plainly — the platform's 2025 GAAP net income was $447 million on $3.742 billion in revenue SEC — FY2025 Form 10-K, while the marginal 34-minute unit of work described here does not cover its own inputs.

Groups disproportionately exposed are part-time and "fill-in" shoppers, those in markets with $4 minimum batch pay, and drivers in car-dependent regions such as Central Florida where a delivery to "the city outskirts" adds distance without adding pay.

Planetary impact

The environmental picture is genuinely mixed, and overstating either direction would be wrong.

Vehicle-based last-mile delivery generates greenhouse gases and local air pollution, and the emissions profile of any single delivery depends on vehicle fuel economy, distance, and whether the trip replaced a customer's own car trip or added one that would not otherwise have happened. Research on grocery-delivery last-mile emissions shows the outcome hinges on consolidation and vehicle choice rather than on delivery as such Kunkel — The Effect of Grocery Delivery Services on Last Mile Emissions (Harvard). Instacart itself argues it minimizes environmental impact by reducing unnecessary travel and fuel consumption — a company claim, not independent verification Bringg — Eco-friendly grocery delivery.

The broader delivery literature is more cautionary: same-day expectations push more, faster trips and increase carbon, while delaying delivery by three to four days has been associated with emissions reductions of up to 56% Global Landscapes Forum — Same-day delivery is harming workers and the planet, and research cited by PBS found a 36% emissions reduction from delaying delivery by one to two days PBS NewsHour — Fast shipping has environmental impact.

Two honest caveats: batched orders delivered by one vehicle can be more efficient per item than separate individual car trips, and the environmental impact of an individual $5.68 batch is small in absolute terms. The material environmental question is not this one order but whether a high-volume, same-day, car-based fulfilment model substitutes for or adds to vehicle miles travelled at scale — a question that neither Instacart nor most independent studies answer definitively.

What to do next

If you are a shopper:

  1. Run the batch math before accepting: (offered pay) − (gas) − (maintenance/mile × miles) − (unpaid waiting time) ÷ (total minutes) = your effective hourly rate. Compare it to your own target, not to Instacart's average.
  2. Track mileage from the first mile, including travel to the store. Unlogged miles are unclaimed deductions ExpenseBot.
  3. Use the IRS rate as your internal cost benchmark — 70 cents/mile in 2025, 72.5 cents in 2026 IRS; IRS 2026. If a batch doesn't clear 70 cents/mile plus a labor margin, decline it; declining carries no penalty Instacart.
  4. Know Florida's schedule: $14.00/hour through September 29, 2026, then $15.00/hour from September 30, 2026 Florida DEO. That is a comparator, not a protection you receive as a 1099 contractor.
  5. If you believe you have been misclassified or left unreimbursed for required expenses, the DOL's misclassification guidance is the starting point for a formal review U.S. Department of Labor.

If you are a customer: tip as a share of your basket value rather than a flat amount, especially on long-distance deliveries to outskirts; tips are the component of shopper pay that is not set by an algorithm Instacart.

If you are a publisher or business covering this: separate platform-level profitability ($447 million GAAP net income on $3.742 billion revenue in 2025) from order-level economics, and always state whether distance is one-way or round trip SEC — FY2025 Form 10-K.

If you are a policymaker: the leverage points used elsewhere are per-hour minimum pay for delivery workers, mandated disclosure of pay-algorithm inputs, and reclassification frameworks — each with costs and trade-offs worth modelling before adoption NYC Rules.

FAQ

Is a $5.68 Instacart batch legal?

Yes, as a contractual matter for most shoppers. Independent contractors are not covered by FLSA minimum-wage or overtime protections; those apply only where a worker is legally an employee U.S. Department of Labor. Legality is separate from profitability, and separate from the pending misclassification litigation against the company ClassAction.org.

How did Instacart make $447 million in 2025 if batches pay so little?

Because Instacart is paid a transaction fee plus advertising revenue on the transaction, not out of the shopper's labour budget. In 2025, total revenue was $3.742 billion on transaction revenue equal to 7.1% of GTV, with GAAP gross profit of $2.758 billion SEC — FY2025 Form 10-K; CNBC.

Does Instacart reimburse shoppers for gas and mileage?

Instacart's published shopper material describes batch pay as compensation for effort including travel, but does not describe a separate mileage or fuel reimbursement, and independent-contractor shoppers are responsible for their own vehicle costs Instacart; ExpenseBot.

What is a realistic Instacart hourly rate?

Gridwise's 2025 dataset of 20,538 tracked shoppers reports a median of $12.21/hour and an average of $12.93/hour in total trip pay, batch pay and tips combined — with the caveat that these are platform-wide figures, not a guarantee for any individual market or batch Gridwise.

How much is the IRS mileage deduction worth on this batch?

At the 2025 rate of 70 cents per mile, 8.2 miles is a $5.74 deduction; the same distance in 2026 is worth $5.95 at 72.5 cents IRS; IRS 2026. A deduction reduces taxable income — it is not a reimbursement, so it does not turn a $5.68 batch into a profitable one.

What is the minimum Instacart batch payment?

Instacart's minimum base pay was reduced from $7 to $4 in 2023, and 2025 reporting describes full-service minimums of $7–$10 and delivery-only minimums around $5 in various markets Business Insider; RoadWarrior.

Conclusion

The $5.68 batch and Instacart's $447 million in 2025 GAAP net income are not in tension — they are the same model seen from two ends. The platform earns a transaction fee on the order regardless of whether the shopper's vehicle costs are covered; the shopper absorbs the difference as unreimbursed fuel, depreciation, and time. At the stated inputs, this batch costs about $12.06 in vehicle costs before the shopper is paid anything, and about $19.99 to match Florida's minimum wage for 34 minutes of work. Whether you are a shopper deciding which batches to accept, a customer deciding how much to tip, or a publisher deciding how to frame gig-economy pay, the useful discipline is the same: state the distance basis, cost the vehicle honestly, and compare the offer to a floor — never to an average.

Sources and further reading

Instacart, Instacart Shoppers, batch pay, gig economy, delivery driver pay, minimum wage, cost per mile, United States,

Bitcoin y Cripto Explicadas por Juan Rodulfo

Bitcoin es una criptomoneda inventada en 2008 por una persona o grupo que usa el nombre Satoshi Nakamoto. 
Su empleo comenzó en 2009, cuando se lanzó su implementación como software de código abierto. Visita: bitcoinsimple.club
Según CoinMarketCap, actualmente hay 8.528 Criptomonedas. En un sistema de criptomonedas, una comunidad conocida como mineros mantiene la integridad, la seguridad y el equilibrio de las cuentas. Esta comunidad utiliza sus computadoras u otro hardware especializado para validar y fechar transacciones, agregándolas a una base de datos colectiva.
Muchas criptomonedas están diseñadas para disminuir gradualmente la producción de unidades, imponiendo un límite al número total de unidades que pueden estar en circulación. Por ejemplo, Bitcoin en la fecha de producción de este programa tiene una cantidad corriente de 18,633,931 monedas y un suministro máximo de 21,000,000 monedas.
Según NBC News en un comunicado de prensa publicado el 18 de febrero de 2021, hace un par de días, la capitalización total del mercado de Bitcoin y criptomonedas alcanzó un récord histórico de $1 billón.

Hosted by Juan Rodulfo, available at:
Ubuntu Web: https://ubuntu.cafe​
YouTube: http://bit.ly/3qZfjdJ​

Show your Love:
VENMO: https://www.venmo.com/u/rodulfox
Ko-Fi: https://ko-fi.com/rodulfox
Paypal: https://paypal.me/vickytoys
GoFundMe: https://gofund.me/ca74dc42
Crypto: https://ubuntu.cafe/donate/

Podcast:
iTunes: http://apple.co/3qWOgje​
Spotify: http://spoti.fi/3pSZUdn​
iHeart Radio: http://bit.ly/3aYZwpL​
Amazon Music: https://amzn.to/387NRmL​
Deezer: http://bit.ly/37QuXQU​
TuneIN: http://bit.ly/2PeAaM6​

Dónde comprar Bitcon y criptomonedas:
Bittrex: https://bit.ly/3sNBsvm
LocalBitcoins: http://bit.ly/2UeEHg8
Cexio: http://bit.ly/3bn7S9D
Coinbase: http://bit.ly/2MfTuYg
Robinhood: http://bit.ly/2Mh8bKE
Paxful: https://bit.ly/3pFggXd
TradingView: http://bit.ly/2ZyfbWf

Follow Juan Rodulfo:
Google Author: https://g.co/kgs/grjtN5
Google Artist: https://g.co/kgs/H7Fiqg
Twitter: https://twitter.com/rodulfox
Facebook: https://facebook.com/rodulfox
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rodulfox
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/rodulfox/
VK: https://vk.com/rodulfox
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@rodulfox
TradingView: https://www.tradingview.com/u/rodulfox/

#queesbitcoin #bitcoin #dogecoin #dondecomprarbitcoin #queesBTC #comocomprarBitcoin #comocomprarBTC #criptomonedas #quesoncriptomonedas

 

 

 

 

La Guerra del Dictador Maduro Contra la Media

 

 

La Guerra del Dictador Nicolás Maduro Contra Comunicadores Sociales y Medios. consiste en 5 Tomos publicados en el año 2018 que contienen las atrocidades cometidas por esta Dictadura “Cívico-Militar” en contra de los Derechos Humanos y la Libertad de Expresión en Venezuela entre los años 2013 y 2018, publicada por el Periodista Eladio Rodulfo Gonzalez.
A la fecha de publicación de este video, 26 de Febrero de 2021, la Dictadura en Venezuela permanece arrasando con el Tesoro Nacional y los Recursos Naturales del Planeta, para enriquecerse y enriquecer los Círculos de Poder que lo sostienen en Miraflores, sobre el hambre, la miseria y la muerte distribuida para el resto de la población del País.
Con esta Investigación y Data compilada y Publicada por este periodista, se desmantela la imagen democrática que el régimen intenta vender a través de sus medios propagandísticos a nivel nacional e internacional.
Pretender borrar la y reescribir la Historia a su manera, es algo que acostumbran los Dictadores, pero imposible por más poder económico que puedan acumular mediante el latrocinio del Tesoro Nacional.

Hosted by Juan Rodulfo, available at:
Ubuntu Web: https://ubuntu.cafe​
YouTube: http://bit.ly/3qZfjdJ​

Show your Love:
VENMO: https://www.venmo.com/u/rodulfox
Ko-Fi: https://ko-fi.com/rodulfox
Paypal: https://paypal.me/vickytoys
GoFundMe: https://gofund.me/ca74dc42
Crypto: https://ubuntu.cafe/donate/

Podcast:
iTunes: http://apple.co/3qWOgje​
Spotify: http://spoti.fi/3pSZUdn​
iHeart Radio: http://bit.ly/3aYZwpL​
Amazon Music: https://amzn.to/387NRmL​
Deezer: http://bit.ly/37QuXQU​
TuneIN: http://bit.ly/2PeAaM6​

La Colección: La Guerra del Dictador Nicolas Maduro contra Comunicadores Sociales y Medios, está disponible en las siguientes librerías, digitales y físicas:

CICUNE: https://cicune.org
Barnes & Noble: http://bit.ly/3XDrZ9V
Amazon Books: https://amzn.to/3HgtxBC
Apple Books: https://apple.co/3GTcOT8
Google Books: http://bit.ly/3HdAB1z
Agapea: http://bit.ly/3GPIuJo
Aladin: http://bit.ly/3iHcz5T
Adlibris: http://bit.ly/3kqL9BJ
Blackwell's: http://bit.ly/3XmEoPM
Book Depository: http://bit.ly/3WeRai0
Indigo: http://bit.ly/3wapEYo
Fishpond: http://bit.ly/3GT9PKH
Kobo: http://bit.ly/3iKsVdZ
Lehmanns: http://bit.ly/3w9X3CD
Powell's: http://bit.ly/3GK9Znw
Scribd: http://bit.ly/3IVVuQc
Thriftbooks: http://bit.ly/3GSoAgz
Walmart: http://bit.ly/3CWBby6
Waterstones: http://bit.ly/3Wn0RLc 

Pronto en Audiolibro

#nicolasmaduro #libertaddeprensa #venezuela #venezolanosenexilio #libertaddeexpresion #periodismo #comunicacionsocial #rodulfogonzalez #dictaduraenvenezuela

La Guerra del Dictador Hugo Chavez contra Comuni

 

Colección de 8 tomos publicada en el año 2018 por el Periodista Eladio Rodulfo Gonzalez, disponible en: https://cicune.org, que contiene las atrocidades cometidas por esta Dictadura “Cívico-Militar” en contra de los Derechos Humanos y la Libertad de Expresión en Venezuela entre los años 2004 a 2012.
Con esta Investigación y Data compilada y Publicada por este periodista, se desmantela la imagen democrática que el régimen intenta vender a través de sus medios propagandísticos a nivel nacional e internacional.
Pretender borrar la y reescribir la Historia a su manera, es algo que acostumbran los Dictadores, pero imposible por más poder económico que puedan acumular mediante el latrocinio del Tesoro Nacional.
La Colección: La Guerra del Dictador Hugo Chávez contra Comunicadores Sociales y Medios, está disponible en las siguientes librerías, digitales y físicas:


CICUNE: https://cicune.org
Barnes & Noble: http://bit.ly/3XDrZ9V
Amazon Books: https://amzn.to/3HgtxBC
Apple Books: https://apple.co/3GTcOT8
Google Books: http://bit.ly/3HdAB1z
Agapea: http://bit.ly/3GPIuJo
Aladin: http://bit.ly/3iHcz5T
Adlibris: http://bit.ly/3kqL9BJ
Blackwell's: http://bit.ly/3XmEoPM
Book Depository: http://bit.ly/3WeRai0
Indigo: http://bit.ly/3wapEYo
Fishpond: http://bit.ly/3GT9PKH
Kobo: http://bit.ly/3iKsVdZ
Lehmanns: http://bit.ly/3w9X3CD
Powell's: http://bit.ly/3GK9Znw
Scribd: http://bit.ly/3IVVuQc
Thriftbooks: http://bit.ly/3GSoAgz
Walmart: http://bit.ly/3CWBby6
Waterstones: http://bit.ly/3Wn0RLc 

Pronto en Audiolibro

DONACIONES: 

VENMO: https://www.venmo.com/u/rodulfox

Ko-Fi: https://ko-fi.com/rodulfox

Paypal: https://paypal.me/vickytoys

#NicolasMaduro #DictaduraenVenezuela #Venezuela #DerechosHumanos #LibertaddeExpresion #Periodismo #LibertaddePrensa #NuevoPodcast #UbuntuCafe #JuanRodulfo #RodulfoGonzalez

LAS CENIZAS DEL EJERCITO LIBERTADOR

LAS CENIZAS DEL EJERCITO LIBERTADOR, de Juan Rodulfo, disponible en: https://apple.co/3y1xjZQ De como Fidel y sus títeres en Miraflores y Fuerte Tiuna volvieron trizas una de las Organizaciones con más antigüedad en Latinoamerica: El Ejército Venezolano, reducido a 10 generalotes combatientes de la guerra por el "no me den, pónganme donde haiga" y una población civil desnutrida, llevada con disfraz de militar a los actos proselitistas del regimen, a cambio de un plato de comida #Venezuela #Ejercitovenezolano #venezolanosenexilio #nicolasmaduro #padrinolopez #diosdadocabello #EjercitoLibertador #SimonBolivar

Tissue dispenser Monkey

Tissue Dispenser Monkey $14.99, GO: https://amzn.to/3jDinx3 Button design, you can hang on your car's headrest back or back rear seat for convenient use. And hang it wherever you want #tissuedispenser #tissuedispensermonkey #monkeystuff #dispensadordeservilletas #facetissue

Aerial Roof Inspection

Need an Aerial Roof Inspection?, Aerial Photography and Video for Realtors, Drone Mapping, Weather and Booking Go: redwaspdrone.com, WhatsApp: 7862771213 #DroneService #RoofInspection #DroneServicePensacola #Pensacola #AerialPhoto #AerialVideo #DroneMapping #RealEstatePhoto

Pop Latino

Puro #POPLATINO, Apple Music #playlist, GO: https://apple.co/3RTvDe4 In the nearly two years since dropping the career-defining KG0516, #KAROLG has continued to reward her massive and expanding fanbase with singles that feel like events. Following the successes of #CAIRO and #GATÚBELA, the #Colombian superstar prepares the world for her next big move with the auspicious release of #XSIVOLVEMOS. The volatile and erotic contents of this Ovy On the Drums-produced cut play out in a passionate dialogue-as-duet between her and #RomeoSantos. No stranger to reggaetón, the #bachata superstar already boasts a series of hits in his catalog with the likes of #NattiNatasha, #NickyJam, #Ozuna, and #DaddyYankee, to name a few. That said, his studio chemistry with KAROL here is palpable, the track’s sex-positive and explicit nature expressed forcefully by the pair. This playlist is updated often, so if you hear something you like, add it to your library.

次ページ >>