# The Application Essay Dilemma: Why Buying a Custom Essay Is a Risky Shortcut and How to Write Authentically Instead
## Introduction
The modern university admissions process has evolved into one of the most scrutinized, competitive, and emotionally charged milestones in a student’s academic life. As acceptance rates at selective institutions continue to decline, the pressure to present a flawless application has never been higher. Among the many components of a college or university application, the personal essay holds a uniquely powerful position. Unlike transcripts, standardized test scores, or extracurricular lists, the essay offers a window into the applicant’s mind, character, and voice. It is the one part of the application that cannot be quantified, yet it is often the most remembered.
In this high-stakes environment, a growing industry has emerged: companies and freelance writers offering to “buy custom essays for university applications.” Marketed with slogans like “guaranteed admission,” “plagiarism-free,” and “written by Ivy League graduates,” these services target anxious students, overwhelmed parents, and time-constrained applicants. The promise is seductive: outsource the most vulnerable and reflective part of your application to a professional, eliminate stress, and secure a polished narrative that stands out among thousands.
Yet beneath the glossy marketing lies a complex web of academic, ethical, financial, and psychological risks. Purchasing an application essay is not merely a shortcut; it is a fundamental misalignment with the purpose of higher education admissions. Universities do not evaluate applicants solely to fill seats; they seek to build communities of authentic, resilient, and self-aware individuals who will contribute to campus life and beyond. An essay that does not reflect the applicant’s voice, experiences, or intellectual trajectory undermines that mission. Moreover, admissions committees have become increasingly sophisticated in detecting inauthentic writing, and the consequences of misrepresentation can be severe, ranging from immediate rejection to the revocation of admission years later.
This article provides a comprehensive, evidence-based exploration of the “buy custom essay” phenomenon. It examines why students are drawn to these services, the hidden risks and long-term consequences of purchasing an application essay, the academic integrity frameworks that govern admissions, and the ethical dimensions of outsourcing personal narrative. It also demystifies what admissions officers truly value in an essay and offers a step-by-step, psychologically grounded framework for writing a compelling, authentic application essay without compromising integrity. Finally, it outlines ethical resources, support systems, and practical strategies that empower students to navigate the admissions process with confidence, clarity, and authenticity.
The goal is not to shame students who feel overwhelmed, nor to ignore the systemic inequalities that make college admissions feel inaccessible. Rather, it is to reframe the application essay not as a hurdle to be circumvented, but as an opportunity for self-discovery, narrative ownership, and intellectual growth. In an era where authenticity is both rare and highly valued, the most competitive application is not the one that sounds perfect, but the one that sounds true.
---
## 1. The Rising Temptation: Why Students Consider Buying Application Essays
To understand why the market for custom application essays continues to expand, it is necessary to examine the psychological, social, and structural pressures that drive students toward outsourcing their personal narratives. The decision to purchase an essay is rarely impulsive; it is typically the culmination of months of anxiety, information overload, and perceived inadequacy.
### The Weight of Competition and Scarcity Mindset
Over the past two decades, the number of college applicants has grown significantly, while the number of available seats at highly selective institutions has remained relatively stable or even decreased. This supply-demand imbalance has fostered a culture of hyper-competitiveness. Students are acutely aware of acceptance rates that hover in the single digits for many elite universities, and this scarcity mindset triggers a fear of falling behind. When students perceive that every component of their application must be optimized to survive the initial screening, the essay becomes a high-leverage variable. If grades and test scores are already at or near institutional averages, the essay is viewed as the differentiator. In this context, professional writing services position themselves as force multipliers, promising to transform an “ordinary” story into an “extraordinary” one.
### The Illusion of Professional Polish
Many students and parents equate professional writing with superior writing. They assume that admissions officers prefer sophisticated vocabulary, complex sentence structures, and polished rhetorical devices. This misconception leads applicants to believe that their natural voice is inadequate. When students draft their first essays, they often encounter harsh self-criticism or well-intentioned but misdirected feedback from peers and family members. Phrases like “this sounds too simple,” “you need to sound more mature,” or “this isn’t impressive enough” can erode confidence. Commercial essay services exploit this vulnerability by offering “expert editors” who guarantee “admissions-level quality.” In reality, what sounds impressively polished to a high school student often reads as generic, over-edited, or emotionally detached to an experienced admissions reader.
### Time Poverty and Executive Function Challenges
The modern high school student’s schedule is frequently unsustainable. Between advanced coursework, standardized test preparation, extracurricular commitments, part-time jobs, and family responsibilities, many applicants face severe time poverty. Writing a reflective, coherent, and compelling essay requires uninterrupted mental space, iterative drafting, and emotional bandwidth. Students who struggle with executive functioning, anxiety, or learning differences may find the open-ended nature of personal essays particularly daunting. Rather than seeking structured support, some turn to essay mills as a time-saving solution. The transactional promise—“send us your details, we deliver a finished essay in 72 hours”—appears to solve an immediate logistical problem, but it bypasses the developmental process that makes the essay meaningful in the first place.
### Information Asymmetry and Access Inequality
College admissions counseling is unevenly distributed. Students in well-resourced schools often have access to dedicated college counselors, writing workshops, alumni networks, and private consultants. First-generation, low-income, or rural applicants frequently navigate the process with minimal institutional support. This access gap creates a perception that success requires paid intervention. Essay marketing campaigns amplify this anxiety by suggesting that without professional help, applicants are “flying blind.” While ethical counseling and editing services can be valuable, the line between legitimate support and ghostwriting is frequently blurred in the commercial space. Many students do not realize that purchasing a fully written essay crosses into academic misrepresentation, especially when they are told the service is “just like hiring a tutor.”
### The Normalization of Outsourcing in Academic Culture
Broader cultural trends have normalized outsourcing intellectual labor. From tutoring services that complete homework to AI tools that generate research summaries, the boundary between assistance and substitution has become increasingly porous. In some educational environments, students are accustomed to collaborative or supported writing processes, making it difficult to distinguish between ethical feedback and unethical ghostwriting. When essay services use language like “co-writing,” “premium editing,” or “strategic narrative development,” they obscure the reality that the final product may bear little resemblance to the student’s authentic voice or lived experience. This linguistic ambiguity allows students to rationalize purchasing an essay as a legitimate extension of academic support.
Understanding these drivers is essential not to excuse the practice, but to address it constructively. The temptation to buy an essay is a symptom of systemic pressure, not a reflection of moral failure. Recognizing the root causes allows educators, counselors, and institutions to offer alternatives that reduce anxiety while preserving integrity.
---
## 2. The Hidden Costs and Risks of Buying Application Essays
The marketing materials for custom essay services emphasize convenience, quality, and guaranteed results. What they consistently omit are the substantial risks that accompany the transaction. These risks operate on multiple levels: academic, financial, psychological, and long-term professional.
### Academic Consequences and Admissions Enforcement
Universities maintain strict policies regarding application authenticity. Nearly all institutions include language in their admissions guidelines stating that all submitted materials must be the applicant’s own work. Misrepresentation—including submitting an essay written by someone else—is classified as academic dishonesty, even before enrollment. When discovered, the standard consequence is immediate rejection. If the fraud is uncovered after admission, universities routinely rescind offers. In severe cases, students who have already enrolled may face disciplinary review, loss of financial aid, or expulsion.
Detection methods have evolved significantly. Admissions offices do not rely solely on plagiarism checkers like Turnitin, which are designed for submitted academic work, not application essays. Instead, they use holistic verification processes. These include:
- **Stylistic analysis:** Comparing the essay’s voice, syntax, and thematic depth with the applicant’s high school writing samples, teacher recommendations, and interview responses.
- **Inconsistency flags:** Noting discrepancies between the essay’s claimed experiences and the applicant’s academic record, extracurricular list, or demographic background.
- **Interview cross-referencing:** Admissions interviews often include questions about essay content. Applicants who cannot discuss their own narrative in detail, reflect on its meaning, or explain their drafting process raise immediate red flags.
- **AI and pattern detection:** Many institutions now use algorithmic tools trained to identify AI-generated text, formulaic structures, or commercially recycled narratives.
The likelihood of detection is higher than many students assume. Admissions readers evaluate thousands of essays per cycle; they develop an intuitive sense of authentic voice versus manufactured prose. An essay that sounds “too perfect” often stands out negatively.
### Financial Exploitation and Consumer Risk
The essay industry operates in a regulatory gray area. Many companies are based offshore, making consumer protection laws difficult to enforce. Common financial risks include:
- **Hidden fees and upselling:** Initial quotes often exclude “premium writer” fees, “rush delivery” charges, or “plagiarism report” add-ons.
- **No refunds or guarantee loopholes:** “Satisfaction guarantees” typically require the student to accept a heavily revised version rather than receive money back. Refund policies are rarely honored.
- **Quality inconsistency:** Writers are rarely vetted for expertise in admissions psychology or narrative development. Many are freelancers completing orders in multiple languages or unrelated fields.
- **Data privacy violations:** Students share personal information, academic records, and vulnerable life stories with unregulated entities. This data can be sold, leaked, or used for targeted marketing.
Unlike legitimate tutoring or counseling services, essay mills do not operate under educational accreditation, professional ethics boards, or institutional oversight. Students have little recourse when services fail to deliver.
### Psychological and Developmental Costs
Beyond external consequences, purchasing an essay carries internal costs. The application essay is one of the few opportunities in a student’s academic career to engage in structured self-reflection. Through drafting, students clarify their values, process pivotal experiences, and articulate their aspirations. Outsourcing this process deprives them of developmental growth. Students who submit purchased essays often report:
- **Imposter syndrome:** Knowing they did not write the essay creates chronic anxiety during interviews, orientation, and early coursework.
- **Skill deficit:** The inability to write coherently under pressure becomes apparent in college-level assignments, leading to academic struggle.
- **Erosion of self-trust:** Relying on external validation undermines confidence in one’s own voice and judgment.
Admissions committees are not looking for flawless writers; they are looking for self-aware learners. An essay that reflects genuine struggle, insight, and growth is far more compelling than one that mimics perfection.
### Long-Term Institutional and Career Impact
The consequences of application fraud can extend beyond college. Graduate programs, scholarship committees, and employers increasingly verify undergraduate credentials. If a student’s academic trajectory appears misaligned with their application narrative, it raises questions about integrity. Professional licensing boards, particularly in fields like law, medicine, and education, require character references and background checks. A history of academic misrepresentation, even at the admissions stage, can complicate credentialing.
Moreover, attending a university that does not align with one’s actual preparedness or interests often leads to poor academic performance, mental health strain, and transfer or withdrawal. The essay is not just a gatekeeping tool; it is a matching mechanism. When the match is falsified, the outcomes are rarely sustainable.
---
## 3. Academic Integrity and Institutional Policies in Admissions
Academic integrity is not confined to coursework; it is a foundational principle that governs the entire educational lifecycle, beginning with admissions. Universities treat application materials as binding representations of an applicant’s qualifications, character, and readiness. Violating this principle is not a minor infraction; it is a breach of the social contract that underpins higher education.
### The Scope of Admissions Integrity Policies
Most institutions explicitly state in their admissions guidelines that all submitted materials must be the applicant’s own work. For example:
- The Common Application includes a certification section requiring applicants to affirm that all information is accurate and complete.
- The University of California system states that “falsification of any part of the application may result in denial of admission or cancellation of enrollment.”
- UK universities, through UCAS, require personal statements to be written by the applicant and reserve the right to investigate authenticity.
- International institutions increasingly align with global standards set by organizations like the International Center for Academic Integrity (ICAI).
These policies are not aspirational; they are enforceable. Admissions offices maintain review protocols, documentation standards, and escalation pathways for suspected misrepresentation.
### Enforcement Mechanisms and Verification Processes
Detection is multi-layered and often retrospective:
1. **Pre-admission screening:** Readers flag essays with unusual tone, advanced vocabulary inconsistent with academic records, or generic narratives that match known commercial templates.
2. **Post-admission audits:** Universities may request writing samples during orientation or require first-year students to complete baseline assessments. Discrepancies trigger review.
3. **Whistleblower and third-party reports:** Competitors, former clients, or investigative journalists sometimes expose essay services. Universities cross-reference applicant lists with known service databases.
4. **Algorithmic monitoring:** Machine learning models analyze linguistic patterns, syntactic complexity, and semantic coherence to identify AI-generated or commercially produced text.
Importantly, universities do not need to prove “beyond a reasonable doubt” to take action. The standard is typically “preponderance of evidence” or “reasonable suspicion,” aligned with civil rather than criminal thresholds.
### The Role of Honor Codes and Student Conduct
Many institutions extend academic integrity expectations to the admissions phase through honor codes. Students who enroll are often required to sign agreements acknowledging that misrepresentation during admissions violates institutional values. Honor councils routinely handle cases where purchased essays are discovered post-enrollment. Sanctions range from mandatory academic integrity courses to suspension or degree revocation.
The philosophical rationale is clear: higher education is a merit-based ecosystem built on trust. When applicants bypass the reflective and developmental process, they compromise the integrity of the entire cohort. Admissions committees invest hundreds of hours reviewing applications with the assumption that submitted materials are authentic. Fraud undermines that investment and devalues the achievements of honest applicants.
### Global and Cross-Border Considerations
International applicants face additional scrutiny. Visa requirements, credential evaluations, and language proficiency tests create multiple verification checkpoints. An essay that does not align with an applicant’s stated background, academic preparation, or interview performance can trigger immigration or enrollment reviews. Some countries have begun criminalizing commercial essay writing for admissions purposes, recognizing it as a form of educational fraud.
Institutions are also collaborating internationally to share best practices on detection and enforcement. Conferences organized by the National Association for College Admission Counseling (NACAC) and the European Association for International Education (EAIE) regularly address the rise of ghostwriting services and develop unified response strategies.
Academic integrity in admissions is not about punitive enforcement; it is about preserving the credibility of the educational system. When universities maintain rigorous standards, they protect both their institutional reputation and the value of the degrees they confer.
---
## 4. The Ethical and Moral Dimensions of Outsourcing Personal Narrative
Beyond policy and risk, the decision to purchase an application essay raises profound ethical questions. At its core, the essay is a moral document: it asks the applicant to present themselves honestly, reflect on their journey, and articulate their relationship to learning and community. Outsourcing this process transforms a act of self-representation into a transactional performance.
### Authenticity as an Educational Value
Higher education is founded on the pursuit of truth, self-knowledge, and intellectual honesty. The application essay operationalizes these values by asking students to engage in narrative reflection. When students write about challenges, failures, passions, or growth, they are not merely crafting a story; they are constructing meaning. This process builds metacognitive skills, emotional resilience, and ethical reasoning. Purchasing an essay bypasses this developmental work, reducing self-discovery to a commodity.
Authenticity also matters in community building. Universities seek students who will contribute unique perspectives, engage in dialogue, and support peers. An essay that does not reflect the applicant’s genuine voice creates a mismatch between expectation and reality. When students arrive on campus unable to articulate their motivations or engage with the experiences they claimed, it erodes trust and diminishes collaborative learning.
### Fairness and the Meritocratic Ideal
College admissions strive to balance merit with equity. While the system is imperfect, it operates on the principle that effort, preparation, and personal growth should be rewarded. Buying an essay introduces an artificial advantage that cannot be justified by talent or circumstance. It distorts the evaluative process, making it harder for admissions committees to identify students who have demonstrated resilience, intellectual curiosity, or leadership through their own efforts.
This is not to suggest that all advantages are unethical. Access to counseling, test preparation, or writing support can be legitimate if they enhance rather than replace the applicant’s voice. The ethical line is drawn at substitution: when another person writes the narrative, the applicant ceases to be the author of their own story. In educational ethics, authorship is inseparable from accountability. You cannot claim credit for work you did not create.
### The Psychological Contract with Admissions Committees
Admissions officers read essays with the expectation that they are engaging with real individuals. They invest time, empathy, and professional judgment into evaluating narratives that reflect human experience. Submitting a purchased essay violates this implicit contract. It treats the admissions process as a game to be won rather than a conversation to be entered. Over time, widespread fraud could lead to more rigid, formulaic, or defensive evaluation methods, ultimately harming all applicants.
### Cultural and Generational Perspectives
Different cultures place varying emphasis on individualism versus collectivism, which can shape attitudes toward essay writing. In some contexts, family or community involvement in application preparation is normative. However, global higher education standards increasingly emphasize personal authorship and individual accountability. Navigating this tension requires transparency: students can seek guidance, share drafts, and receive feedback, but the final narrative must be their own.
Generational shifts toward digital communication and AI assistance have also blurred boundaries. While technology can enhance writing, it must not erase agency. Ethical use of tools means leveraging them for brainstorming, structure, or grammar, not for content generation. The moral standard remains consistent: the essay must reflect the applicant’s mind, not a machine’s algorithm or a ghostwriter’s template.
Ethical admissions are not about perfection; they are about honesty. A flawed but authentic essay demonstrates maturity, self-awareness, and readiness for college. A polished but purchased essay demonstrates avoidance, and that is a trait no university seeks to cultivate.
---
## 5. What Admissions Officers Actually Look For in an Application Essay
To write a compelling essay, it is essential to understand the evaluative framework used by admissions committees. Contrary to popular belief, readers are not searching for literary masterpieces, tragic backstories, or exhaustive achievement lists. They are looking for signals of intellectual vitality, emotional maturity, and institutional fit.
### Voice Over Perfection
Admissions officers prioritize authentic voice above all else. Voice encompasses tone, rhythm, perspective, and emotional honesty. It is what makes an essay memorable long after the committee meeting ends. Students often mistake voice for stylistic flair, but true voice emerges from specificity and self-awareness. An essay that describes a mundane moment with genuine reflection is far more impactful than one that recounts a dramatic event with detached prose.
Readers can detect when a student is performing rather than communicating. Signs of inauthenticity include:
- Overuse of thesaurus-derived vocabulary
- Generic moral lessons that lack personal connection
- Pacing that feels rushed or overly structured
- Emotional tone that does not match the content
Conversely, authentic essays often include:
- Conversational but precise language
- Vulnerability without self-pity
- Curiosity and open-ended reflection
- Clear connection between experience and growth
### Narrative Arc and Thematic Depth
A strong essay has a clear narrative structure, but not necessarily a traditional beginning-middle-end. Instead, it moves from context to reflection to insight. Admissions readers look for:
- **Specificity:** Concrete details that ground the story in reality.
- **Reflection:** Analysis of why the experience mattered, not just what happened.
- **Growth:** Evidence of changed perspective, developed skills, or clarified values.
- **Forward momentum:** Connection between past experience and future aspirations.
Essays that merely list accomplishments or rehash resumes fail because they do not reveal internal processing. The essay is not a summary; it is a lens.
### Alignment with Institutional Values
Universities use essays to assess fit. Each institution has distinct cultural priorities: some emphasize social impact, others intellectual risk-taking, community engagement, or interdisciplinary curiosity. A compelling essay demonstrates awareness of these values without pandering. It shows how the applicant’s background, interests, and goals intersect with the university’s mission.
Readers are trained to identify essays that are “universally applicable”—narratives that could be submitted to any school without modification. These are typically rejected because they lack institutional specificity. Conversely, essays that name particular programs, faculty interests, or campus cultures in a genuine way signal intentionality and research.
### Red Flags and Common Pitfalls
Admissions committees routinely note patterns that weaken essays:
- **Clichés:** “I learned the value of hard work,” “Sports taught me teamwork,” “Travel changed my perspective.” Without unique context, these read as filler.
- **Trauma dumping:** Sharing deeply personal pain without reflection or resolution can overwhelm the reader and obscure academic readiness.
- **Resume repetition:** Restating achievements already listed elsewhere adds no new information.
- **Over-editing:** Multiple layers of adult or professional revision can strip the essay of adolescent authenticity.
- **Lack of focus:** Jumping between topics without a unifying theme confuses the reader and dilutes impact.
The most successful essays are often quiet, precise, and deeply personal. They do not try to impress; they try to communicate.
### The Holistic Review Context
Essays are not evaluated in isolation. They are read alongside transcripts, recommendations, activities, and interviews. Admissions officers look for consistency. An essay about leadership should align with recommendation letters that describe initiative. A narrative about intellectual curiosity should match course selection and teacher comments. Discrepancies trigger scrutiny.
Understanding this ecosystem helps applicants write strategically. The essay is not a standalone performance; it is a coordinating document that ties the application together. When it reflects the applicant’s genuine trajectory, it enhances credibility. When it diverges, it undermines it.
---
## 6. How to Write a Standout Application Essay Yourself
Writing an effective application essay is a skill that can be developed through structured process, reflective practice, and ethical support. The following framework provides a step-by-step approach to crafting a compelling narrative without compromising authenticity.
### Step 1: Self-Inventory and Brainstorming
Begin by mapping your experiences, values, and intellectual interests. Use prompts such as:
- What problem do I consistently try to solve?
- When did I change my mind about something important?
- What activity makes me lose track of time?
- What failure taught me more than success?
- What do my teachers or peers consistently notice about me?
Record raw answers without editing. Look for patterns. The strongest essay topics often emerge from seemingly ordinary moments that reveal deeper insights.
### Step 2: Prompt Selection and Narrative Framing
Choose a prompt that aligns with your strongest material. Common App prompts, UC PIQs, and institutional supplements all allow flexibility. Frame your story around a specific moment, then expand outward to show impact and reflection. Avoid broad themes; anchor them in concrete experiences.
Develop a working thesis: What is the core insight you want the reader to take away? This should be implicit, not stated directly. The essay should show, not tell.
### Step 3: Drafting with Voice and Specificity
Write the first draft freely. Do not worry about word count or perfection. Focus on:
- Sensory details and dialogue
- Internal monologue and emotional honesty
- Pacing that allows reflection to breathe
- Transitions that feel natural, not forced
Read aloud to test voice. If it sounds like someone else, revise until it sounds like you. Authenticity is cultivated through iteration, not imitation.
### Step 4: Revision Cycles and Structural Refinement
Revise in layers:
1. **Content:** Is the story clear? Does it show growth? Is the reflection meaningful?
2. **Structure:** Does the opening hook engage? Does the middle develop the idea? Does the conclusion resonate without summarizing?
3. **Language:** Remove clichés, tighten syntax, ensure tone consistency.
4. **Alignment:** Does the essay complement other application materials?
Limit revisions to 3–4 cycles. Over-editing strips voice.
### Step 5: Ethical Feedback and Support
Seek input from trusted adults who understand admissions ethics:
- School counselors
- English teachers
- College access program mentors
- Writing center tutors
Provide clear boundaries: “I want feedback on clarity, structure, and authenticity. Please do not rewrite sentences or change my voice.” Use comments to refine, not replace.
### Step 6: Final Polish and Submission
Check for:
- Word count compliance
- Grammar and punctuation
- Prompt alignment
- Consistency with application narrative
Submit with confidence. A well-crafted, authentic essay will stand out not because it is perfect, but because it is yours.
---
## 7. Ethical Resources and Support Systems for Authentic Essay Writing
Students do not have to navigate the essay process alone. Numerous ethical, accessible resources exist to provide guidance, feedback, and encouragement without compromising integrity.
### School-Based Support
College counselors and English teachers are trained to assist with narrative development. Many schools offer writing workshops, peer review groups, and one-on-one conferences. Utilize these early in the process.
### Free and Low-Cost Programs
Organizations like QuestBridge, Posse Foundation, College Advising Corps, and NACAC provide essay guides, webinars, and mentorship at no cost. Many universities host free admissions workshops for prospective students.
### Ethical Editing vs. Ghostwriting
Professional editing is acceptable when it focuses on clarity, structure, and grammar, not content generation. Reputable editors will not write sentences, suggest experiences, or alter voice. Always verify credentials and request sample feedback.
### AI as a Tool, Not a Crutch
AI can assist with brainstorming, outlining, and grammar checks, but should never generate content. Use it to ask questions, not to answer them. Always disclose AI use if required by institutional policy.
### Building a Support Network
Family, community leaders, and alumni can provide perspective and encouragement. Share drafts with those who know you well and can affirm your authentic voice.
The essay process is demanding, but it is also transformative. With ethical support, students can produce work that is both compelling and true.
---
## Conclusion
The temptation to buy a custom essay for a university application is understandable in a high-pressure, competitive landscape. Yet the risks—academic, financial, psychological, and ethical—far outweigh any perceived advantage. Admissions committees are not seeking flawless prose; they are seeking authentic voices. An essay that reflects genuine reflection, specific experience, and personal growth will always outperform a manufactured narrative.
Writing your own essay is not just a requirement; it is an opportunity. It is a chance to clarify your values, articulate your aspirations, and present yourself with honesty and confidence. The process builds skills that will serve you throughout college and beyond: self-awareness, resilience, and intellectual integrity.
Invest in the process. Seek ethical support. Trust your voice. The university that accepts you should be choosing the real you, not a fictionalized version crafted by someone else. In the end, the application essay is not a ticket to admission; it is a mirror. What it reflects should be unmistakably, unapologetically you.
Essay writing discount
Search in telegram - essaywritingdiscount
Visit the website - https://t.me/essaywritingdiscount