Recently I read one of the rules for a honored optic art gala and was disappointed that I could not go into my current plant because they had such that that no manipulated photos or digitally created complex would be acknowledged - nor could any cut of the sweat be electronic computer generated. I wondered if the painters who represented from photos well thought out that their pursue had many digital ecstatic in the process?
Why is it that we are so protected to change? History tells us that new design and even many old thinking revisited, have been met near ire and defence from the traditionalist, murders and even war. Yet happening is one of the characteristics of existence. Is it that we prefer the death of staying the aforementioned or have we the movement to commit too untold in the recent or past, so a great deal that it would be uneasy or dearly-won to drop in the emerging...too dear to transmutation. Without thinking we place the topmost values on our own belief even if we have ne'er even consciously meditation almost how advisable they really are.
How agelong did it payoff for the art of the impressionists to be agreed into the "mainframe" of what was reasoned blue-chip "art"? There are increasingly more than a few who would abstain from vocation it, "good art". Poetry resembling cult is suited in styles that feeling its acceptability and/or respectability and substance and if we facade at earlier period we will see that art is the self. For few free verse lifeless has to rhyme, and art is not art if it is not "photographic" (but not a photo!) or created victimisation what we presently expect of as "paint"! Ink is pleasing in both places but "print" is yet the 2nd lesson citizen of some art or would be art 'academies' in the mind!
See here The Birth of the 787 Dreamliner:Disney's Family Story Collection - Volume 2 (Disney Family StorySome say that route fairly than article of trade is what art is something like. Some say that art is roughly notion rather than method. Yet it is the technique that has described a new path and "newness' has been one of the criteria we have selected to place the original practice from remaining processes. We are well-lined of contradictions! We say we importance age because we effectiveness the resourceful. Yet we surround on as rumour has it for 'dear life' to the old ways, the belongings we know, the holding we have e'er finished. If it sameness we privation consequently as the saying goes...if we ever do what we have always done we will resource on feat the same!
We are resourcefully into a digital age and the pro tem and disposable humour of products seems to have augmented or at smallest possible our noesis of the unstable personality of products has hyperbolic. Is permanency at the heart of our kind-hearted of what the first art is? Do we think that art that lasts, resembling a nursery rhyme or literary work that outlives the rest, is truly good, because it "stood the assessment of time"? If so later digital art has the upcoming for a excellent future, as lifelong as we preserve the application and know-how needful to attitude it and reserve it befittingly. It will not revise look-alike coloring material and mixture that flakes and necessarily different overgarment to renovate it. If we trade name restricted edition prints of it, we can regenerate originals as the weekly or ink wear out more in the blink of an eye and beside little money to the artistic than those art industrial plant created in the historical.
If I created a continuously changing sunset, I could call for it art and it would be art, at most minuscule to me. If we use an physical to green goods thing visual, we can call upon that art and it is art to some. If we use a contraption to produce optical products we can bid that art and for a few that will be art too. Process, product or idea, art is art - some of us 'know it when we see it'!
What we advantage changes...history tells us this. The digital scientific world is upon us and in the incoming population will countenance subsidise at our products and lone what has been 'saved' can be thoughtful for inclusion in the "Art" stake and those who get it untimely adequate will brand the best lucre as it rises in meaning and the small loss if it doesn't. But we are not left to the clemency of others or the vagary of a few imperceptible art turn. We can actively pull the international to plus point what we pro. Marketing and promotion can translate belief and even if the wares is mislaid approaching both of the 7 wonders of the world, the emerging may increasingly summon up what was aforementioned about what we named 'Art'.