The Special Self-Defense Forces charred the bodies.

 

 People change their language system depending on the situation, and they choose their words accordingly. 

 

This tendency is especially evident when concentrating or on duty. For example, when speaking English, if you are suddenly asked a question about language use in Japanese, you may reply with "Huh?", "Ah, no, that's...", and so on, and you may reply with a word that is currently in use. 

 

This is especially common when you are concentrating. In the testimony of 123, the first three motocross riders, wearing goggles and masks, told the Special Forces members in the middle of summer that there are injured people here too, and that the members of the ambassador will not touch them as it is dangerous, and will come to rescue them later. 

 

This is how the riders are thought to be saying, "There are people here who are alive, so please treat them quickly, and help them." 

 

Although it seems that they are officially being treated as if they are ignoring the message. Their intention was to treat them quickly!! ! 

 

What are you doing?   The answer was "Don't touch it." 

 

If we assume that they were Mitsubishi, a Japanese military company, and that the head of the Self-Defense Forces regional command at the time was the current Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, which was a school established by Mitsubishi in the Meiji era that was made into a government-run institution the following year, and that this was in the testing stage for the success of the weapon, and that this was the domestic production of missiles that were being secretly finalized by the US military...

 

then this was a concession made by Commander Matsunaga Sadaaki, and in particular, the early arrival of the US military at Osutaka, and the report from the C130 that another US military helicopter had already arrived, and that the C130 had been circling above Ogata for about an hour during that time, according to the testimony of a US military pilot - Antonucci, now editor-in-chief of Inside California magazine. 

 

  The pilot and co-pilot also testified in the same way. 

 

I felt a big question here. 

 

All US military personnel testified in a language system that was consistent with the military's obligation to write reports. 

 

Antonucci stated that when he arrived at Osutaka, red flames were already visible, meaning that it was easy to see the fire, and that when he arrived, he was able to see the smoky trees and small flames from the sky because the sun had not yet set. 

 

This is a situation explanation, and our report is accurate, and allows the time and the situation at the scene to be understood in a situational manner. 

 

This seems natural when writing a report. 

 

For the Japanese commander, who is also a military officer, to simply state that the US military did not know about it seems more like a denial of an amateur crime than a military officer. 

 

Since there is no overlap in the chain of command, would a report within the military be valid unless a reason is added, such as saying that the information was not received? 

 

Would this be acceptable to a senior US military officer?

 

 Also, the responses of the special forces seem to contain characteristics of when their minds and focus are elsewhere.

 

 First of all, if you desperately search for debris, wearing goggles or other unnecessary items, and searching in the middle of summer, doing a head search, you would probably show it. 

 

I think that this makes the vocabulary of the language you speak very limited and narrow. 

 

When you are sleepy, you don't explain in a language you know. In other words, you are dependent on the language system the other person has spoken, that is, you are aware that your brain is lacking in sufficiency so as not to make mistakes. 

 

This is what you often hear: depending on the language words you have spoken, you are lacking other words that you would naturally utter yourself, and the fact that they are difficult to come up with overlaps with a kind of tense state that should be strictly prohibited, and strengthens the localization of the language center. 

 

Parents and children react strangely to this in a normal state so that they can immediately tell whether something is appropriate or inappropriate for the situation. 

 

The Special Self-Defense Forces will also be responding to the three from the perspective of a rescue-related team.

 

So if the three people were in the same situation, would they have ended it with a short sentence like "Don't touch the danger?" 

 

Normally, they would first ask about their identities, their motives for coming, and the means they used. 

 

Then, it would be natural to have them remove dangerous objects and obstacles around the survivors. 

 

That is if the main goal was to rescue lives. 

 

Both the SDF commander and the Special Self-Defense Forces personnel use language that is very distracting and not on the spot

 

The US military testimony is consistently about securing lives, so I didn't feel any other restrictions at all. 

 

And here too, it was strangely quiet, and the media was not talking at all, except for the transmission of orders and information from higher ups, perhaps because they were thinking of firing themselves.

 

 Rather than being confused, they just wouldn't say anything until a decision was made. 

 

If we move a different report, our lives will be in danger, so no matter what happens to other people and readers, we will not let it interfere with our lives. 

 

There were many examples of this in the Meiji era, W1, and especially W2. Legal fascism, martial law, and the destruction of freedom of speech, the same person in society has somehow become the next leader of the media again. 

 

 NH*, reading **, etc. 

 

In times of confusion, all organizations below the former rank are always kept by Kyokokushi, who is the next leader and continues to be the next leader. 

 

In the Manchukuo era, Japanese media was almost unified in the name of tidying up, eliminating traitor media organizations, and completing the unification of the militarism, and after that, GHQ was completely ignored.

 

 Naturally, the perpetrators of the war were Germany, Italy, Japan, the UK, the US, France, etc., and they were ordered by a single ruling class to work on plunging each country into war by exchanging bribes.

 

 In Japan, the media is the vanguard of intentionally letting socialists run rampant, spreading enough threats to citizens throughout the country with investigative data to massacre those they target. 

 

This time, too, the media is trying to turn attention to and erase it with sexual, stupid, entertainment, etc. 

 

They don't do their own research, they live for a living, they don't care about their neighbors, etc. Like Shoriki, they don't believe in the afterlife at all = their current misdeeds don't matter once they die, so they're a win-win style. 

 

This is the current American prevalence of individual rights, where strong self-assertion is the most important thing, this is a constant decline since the emergence of humanity, and no good can be said to be a group that can be destroyed.

 

 The 123 accident was caused by Prime Minister Nakasone, Defense Minister Kato Koichi, and Chubu Commander Matsunaga Sadaaki. 

 

14 years ago, when all the Self-Defense Forces troops were killed at the ANA Shizukuishi Provincial Capital, Nakasone was the Minister of Defense.

 

 After that, his career as a politician went into a slump for a short period of time.

 

Of course, it doesn't apply to regular Self-Defense Force members, and I would like to think that regular JAL employees were also harmed. 

 

But what is the point of a country if it disregards reports from ordinary citizens? It can only exist with its citizens, and not with anything else. 

 

A completely undemocratic government, one that doesn't listen, where supposedly intelligent ***s are abnormally self-centered, a kind of stateless group with no nationality, and who think they are in charge of many citizens, has been around for a million years. 

 

Democracy, which Platon viewed negatively, is buried in the sloppy everyday life, and inevitably prioritizes itself over others, and is destroyed by the power of money.bribes.. so maybe democracy and capitalism don't go well together?

 

What do you think?