There is an unimaginable, untrue fairness. Everywhere, at all times, a kind of distortion occurs, and in history, people have already overcome it. But why do they dare to make intellectually violent changes at the human level to a fundamental theme?
First of all, how are they trying to avoid the religious irreverence that is the biggest conflict? It seems common, but if you think about it again, is it also connected to the amazing original change attempt? I can say that.
If that is the case, then if the root has already become a fait accompli language, how will readers try to make it a primitive era name, a flow to a threshold that everyone can recognize?
They will do it without changing the easy to change, difficult to change. If the Yu* and Ki religions are not at all layered, in which area do you think it would be better to start the movement to activate the change area?
I think it should start from a place where even if it fails, it can avoid a major disaster. And ultimately, he will become the one who removes the vagueness and opacity of the beginning.
God creates man in his own image, but first of all this goes against Darwinian evolution. All organisms except monogamous ones require opposition.
This is the first departure of life from so-called man. And this gives rise to a kind of central dogma that only submits to conditions on earth, in the ground, and in the air. In other words, man itself needs to exist before God.
This is because he cannot conceive or recognize male and female. This is how it is, it began with the male and female of plants, which existed before that.
In other words, this shows that Hayashigo and others already had male and female as preconceived concepts.
This shines a light on the truth of evolution, which says that male and female were already established before he said anything.
In other words, all concepts of words - sometimes God itself - are destined to be conditioned and determined within a certain range, with optimal conditions determined by time-limited legislation, from the mechanism and food levels.
However, evolution theory is also a kind of perfection that utilizes the optimum + expresses the conditioning situation.
It is only under certain conditions, due to the various elements inside the earth in the solar system, and the oxygen layer, nitrogen, and large amounts of hydrogen that are expressed, that the long-term life form is supported by the availability of surrounding existence factors, and it is not easy to say that a concept such as ``everything'' can arise.
Without anyone's support, living beings create limited conditions for their own energy and the living organisms of the solar system.
It is a kind of peculiarity between the earth and the elements that follow its fluctuations, and it is a kind of fate that when this relationship, whether it be God or not, disappears, like the rest of the universe, it will disappear, so it arises before language, and linguistic concepts are formed according to existing facts in a situation of coexistence with oneself and others.
In other words, the existence of something that exists in a naming language does not determine its existence itself, but rather it is when each individual is forced to symbolize something that is regulated.
Names have the disadvantage of only being able to be expressed in reverse order. Cerebral concepts are immature nerve bundles that originated at a much later stage.
This is something that animals have but humans do not, and it is something that has insufficient motor ability. The motor system is a coordination between the nervous system, muscles, and oxygen. This is naturally something that is controlled by the vagus nerve system, food, mouth, and anus.
This is already a living thing, a thing that changes under certain conditions.
The ancient people excavated in England and living in England had African conditions, and as time passed, due to external conditions, they turned white from the sun, and their hair changed in the same way.
This is already the answer to what humans are.
There is the theory of evolution.
However, in Western Europe, Jewish religion, where did they go wrong? People of color began to be kept as livestock.
It's simply a case of the West being stupid, but this is - even now, in the United States, only about 50% of people believe in the theory of evolution.
This is because it creates strong friction with religion.
The Calvinists rose to power, and the Huguenots and Poulitans seem to have been supported by the reality that they were adapting to the changing times in the way religion was used.
Are gods male and female? When they were making likenesses, why were females created?
They were optimized according to conditions when gender regulations were not important.
This seems to be a very popular technique in the West, and in a sense, it has become a way of life where it is more important than parent-child or sibling relationships.
So, Yu* and Ki-religion are in charge of the same thing, with Yu* as the phenomenon part, and Ki-religion as the part that corresponds to other races...❓... then, even with the common part of God being shared, Yu* has little or no conditional obligation to Ki-religion.
If gender is a part that was originally unknown, where do you think it should be corrected? If it's neither, it seems necessary to show proof of this.
Are we trying to conceptualize the original language as having males and females?
Is it even possible to say that, and that's dangerous? Is LGTB or whatever? Is it something like that?