Critique of the Gotha Program
Kazuo Shii, former Chairman of the Japanese Communist Party (JCP), held a briefing—broadcast live online—regarding revisions to the party’s platform.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9K2k5xSf78While presented as an official report from the JCP’s Executive Committee, the session also served to provide a concrete explanation of the "higher phase" of communist society as envisioned by Marx and Engels, drawing upon their critique of the Gotha Program.Referencing the works and writings of Marx, Shii offered a clear explanation of what scientific socialism and communism—and the society they entail—actually represent.Shii emphasized that what Marx and Engels aimed for was an expansion of "free time"—time that individuals could use as they pleased. Such a society would allow human beings to live their lives most vibrantly, and it was to the realization of this society that the two men dedicated their entire lives.This vision stands in stark contrast to the image of "communism" held by the vast majority of the Japanese public—a perception shaped by long-standing, false narratives propagated by conservatives, right-wing groups, and various cults (claims such as "communism means no freedom," "private property is confiscated," or "thought is strictly controlled").(For further details, please refer to the "Marx and Engels" category on the Excite Blog.)Shii noted that, as Marx and Engels argued in their various writings, the expansion of individual free time leads to the flourishing and development of society as a whole. He pointed out that in Marx’s original German texts, a term is used that carries the dual nuance of both "wealth" (material riches) and "richness" (an abundant, fulfilling life); while this has traditionally been translated into Japanese simply as "wealth" (”tomi”), Shii argued that it should instead be understood as "richness" (”yutakasa”). (In Japan, this term was long translated as "armed revolution," but the original text actually refers to a "powerful revolution"—one driven by great force. Recent translations have begun to correct this.)Citing the ”Critique of the Gotha Program”, Shii emphasized the following points:Regarding the communist principle of "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs," the aspect of "distribution" is a matter to be discussed only at the final stage; it should not be prioritized or celebrated at the outset. Marx consistently maintained that one must not begin by drafting a blueprint for communism.However, Lenin—in ”The State and Revolution”—offered an erroneous interpretation, suggesting that communism is about increasing material wealth. Stalin subsequently expanded and solidified this misinterpretation, imposing it upon communist parties worldwide—a distortion that persisted even after his death.Furthermore, in true communism, the individual is the protagonist, and the state is destined to wither away.Yet, Stalin perpetuated state intervention and coercion over the individual—a reality that has since been exploited to attack the very idea of communism.Influenced by both Lenin and Stalin, communist parties around the world came to interpret communism as a system where "the development of the individual leads to an increase in social wealth."In truth, none of these ideas originated with Marx.Marx also noted that "in the immediate aftermath of the transition from a capitalist to a communist society, the vestiges of capitalism—both moral and spiritual—will likely persist."In a capitalist society, capitalists manage, command, and subjugate workers, stripping them of individual freedom and the liberty to choose their own occupations. Workers have no say in the decision-making processes of the enterprise.Under capitalism, one has no choice but to function as a mere cog in a corporate machine just to survive.In a communist society, by contrast, an "association" functions, and the management of the organization is determined through collective discussion among all its members. (Even today, there exist companies organized as cooperatives where every member serves as both a director and a worker; profits are distributed among all, and management policies are decided collectively. This is featured in Michael Moore’s film ”Capitalism: A Love Story”—though it appears only once in the main feature, the DVD’s bonus content showcases several such companies.)Marx argued that an increase in an individual’s free time allows for the expression of their personal abilities and creativity. Under capitalism, however, capitalists exploit and strip away this individual freedom, as well as the inherent potential and creativity of the person.In a capitalist society, individuals are often forced—contrary to their own will and solely for the sake of survival—to function like mere cogs in a machine, compelled to follow the constant commands of managers or superiors. Consequently, labor becomes a source of suffering for everyone.Marx described capitalism as a "vast collection of commodities" (bourgeois wealth).He posited that, rather than laboring for the sake of profit-seeking capitalists, individuals—acting of their own free will—should be able to pursue their own development. In such a state, labor itself would become the greatest source of joy and pleasure, evolving into a primary human need.Before the rise of the capitalist "manufactory" system, there existed a form of cottage industry where individuals could choose their own professions and work according to their own decisions. "Traces of this still remain today," Mr. Shii added.Harada felt that independent (indie) film directors were a perfect example of this.Mr. Shii cited a passage from the works of Marx and Engels regarding "the architect and the honeybee.""An architect (in this context, perhaps akin to a master carpenter) is able to construct something in their mind before actually building it in the physical world. This is a truly remarkable thing."In a communist society, the commands, domination, and restrictions on freedom imposed by capitalists—as well as the exploitation of human beings by other human beings—would cease to exist. Ultimately, even state power would vanish.One point, however, gave Harada pause.Throughout a very long span of Japanese history, people have been conditioned to work under the directives of capitalists or corporate entities. As a result, a mindset—akin to what Stanley Milgram described in his work on the psychology of obedience—may have taken root: the belief that it is easier to follow a more powerful figure than to think for oneself, and easier to obey orders than to make one’s own choices. The author often hears people in the city remark that they "don't know what to do with themselves" on their days off.Calculations suggest that the labor time actually required by society is only 3 hours and 42 minutes.The remaining time constitutes "surplus labor," which serves solely to generate profit for capitalists.Therefore, working hours could be reduced even further.If individuals had more free time, if their personal autonomy were respected, and if labor itself became an enjoyable pursuit, people would truly flourish.This aligns with the idea we shared in our previous post: that "enjoyment sustains engagement in various activities."As mentioned earlier, cooperative-style enterprises—which resemble the "associations" envisioned under communism—already exist today; thus, communism is by no means a mere fantasy.