The shooting atthat left 26 victims dead, including 20 children, comes just a week after the 23rd anniversary of Canada's own " Massacre," which reshaped the country's gun laws. Moreover, it occurred even as Canadians recently renewed calls for stricter controls on firearms access here amid ongoing efforts by the Conservative government to ease firearms laws.
offered his condolences to the Newtown victims' families while calling the shootings senseless. But critics here accuse Mr. Harper's government of practically standing alone among Western nations in rolling back gun-control protections in recent years most noticeably by scrapping the "long-gun" registry, which logged all of the country's rifles and shotguns, in 2011.
It has been a useful issue for the Conservative government over the last few years; the registry for a long time was a symbol of government waste, says , an associate professor of history at Saint Marys University inand the author of Arming and Disarming: A History of Gun Control in Canada.
There are an estimated 8 million legally owned guns in Canada, representing about 18 percent of Canadian households. Canada's gun laws are more strict than those of the . Canadian federal law requires that all restricted and prohibited weapons including all handguns be registered with the government. Canada also requires licenses to buy, own, and use firearms.
Canada's strict gun regime, including the now repealed long-gun registry, was introduced by the Liberal government in the mid-1990s, in large part prompted by the Montreal Massacre, in which, on Dec. 6, 1989,shot and killed 14 women at thebefore killing himself.
Montreal was also the setting for another school shooting in 2006, at , where one student was killed and 19 were wounded before the killer turned his guns on himself. Andhas increasingly been the setting in recent years of messy gun battles and shootings in crowded public places, often with guns that have either been smuggled in from the US or stolen from registered gun owners.
HAS GUN-LAW RELAXATION GONE TOO FAR...
Canadian gun-control advocates argue that still more restrictions are needed. They point out that the type of hunting rifle used by Lepine in Montreal is sold by , an iconic Canadian chain of hardware stores much as critics of Americas gun culture note that the Bushmaster semi-automatic rifle, used in theshootings, is readily sold by chains like .
And Heidi Rathjen, who witnessed the Montreal Massacre in 1989 and is now part of a group of survivors and family members of the tragedy who advocate for stricter gun controls, says that rifles, shotguns, and many assault-style weapons remain easily accessible in Canada.
To Ms. Rathjen, the Harper government has done more to erode gun laws than simply scrap the long-gun registry: Theyve weakened provisions around licensing. While it remains true that you need a license to purchase a gun, a seller no longer has to check the validity of your permit.
The fact that theres been terrible shootings and gun-related deaths has never made a difference. Theyve been very uncompromising in their position, theyve done everything they could to please the gun lobby, and they plan to do more, adds Rathjen.
Still, the government has shown signs that there are limits to how far it'll go. Earlier this month, on the anniversary of the Montreal Massacre, the prime minister distanced himself from several recommendations of the government-appointed Canadian Firearms Advisory Committee a group comprised almost entirely of gun enthusiasts and advocates when it was reported that the committee recommended eliminating all together the most restrictive prohibited category of firearms which includes automatic assault rifles.
The government has absolutely no intention of weakening that category of protection, Harper was quoted as saying in the .
Another conservative recommendation that would see gun licensing go from five-years to a 10-year renewal term which opposition critics pointed out would provide less opportunity to do background and mental health checks of registered gun owners was later dropped. And mental health and gun ownership have gained renewed traction as details of the Sandy Hook killer come out.
... OR NOT FAR ENOUGH?
But to Canadas gun lobby, the existing licensing and registration regime is restrictive enough. According to Blair Hagen, with Canadas National Firearms Association, if the government recognized the right of citizens to bear arms, it would make any debate about their safe use and ownership a lot easier.
All of the emphasis has been put on controlling and limiting the access to the firearms, and in some ways I can understand that, says Mr. Hagen. But the effects and failures of that system have to be accounted for now. How can you stop a determined person from getting access to these things? Seems to me if theyre determined, no law is going to stop them.
Like their southern counterparts, the US National Rifle Association, the NFA is reluctant to talk about gun control in light of the Newtown tragedy. Is this the time to talk about those things, after a massive tragedy like this? I dont think so. I think its got to be done a lot more rationally, and done with a purpose rather than a reaction, says Hagen.
But Rathjen questions whether the NFA and others opposed to gun control will ever commit to such a discussion willingly. She points out that Harper took a hard line on an assault-weapons ban but only after the CFACs recommendations came to light after gun-control advocates pressed the matter, and in the midst of Canada marking the anniversary of its saddest chapter of gun violence.
I dont know if this makes any difference to them the human tragedy of the Sandy Hook shootings because theyve ignored the evidence, theyve ignored the opinions of experts that say that the long-gun registry is essential, that say that it saves lives, that it helps reduce gun-related crime, she says.
To Dr. Brown, its not inconceivable that the Harper government may want to further weaken gun regulations in deference to its base, but Sandy Hook may prevent this.
They wouldnt dare try and do anything because of the horrific nature of this shooting," he says. "But time will tell.
Related stories
Become a part of the Monitor community
http://blog.yahoo.com/_KSUDN5GPHGX4E6YW5P56U7NKC4/articles/900420
http://dannetteae.blog.fc2.com/blog-entry-36.html
http://darahilt.insanejournal.com/2683.html
http://rickiemut.skyrock.com/3131537562-Downloads-The-Practical-Model-Calculator-For-The-Engineer-Mechanic.html
http://blogs.rediff.com/gilbertip/2012/12/16/search-for-significance-devotional/
http://henriettebso.blogbaker.com/2012/12/15/download-custom-enrichment-module-california-government-e-book
http://twitpic.com/bmdl0r
http://twitpic.com/bmdkzs
http://en.netlog.com/kimberburress/blog/blogid=15416251
http://friendfeed.com/ayvubhu/8e6042a5/downloads-kwaidan-ghost-stories-and-strange
http://friendfeed.com/hanrcbu/19995e39/downloads-necroscope-defilers-e-branch
http://fikooken.insanejournal.com/2909.html
http://twitpic.com/bmdl2t
http://blog.yahoo.com/_6F4ZDZHZJB635ZZ2ISNJ3RWKXM/articles/1003655