While I really should be writing my 2-day-overdue paper on dark tourism right now, I am inherently(?) procrastinating my ass off in front of the computer. Yeah yeah yeah I know I should get going, but y'know, there are times when you just have to procrastinate to the max in order to let out that boredom gained from your homework and daily life before you can continue with your ordinarism (haha I totally made that word up).
Anyway, I've written half way through my paper but I still am unsure what I'm bullshitting about. I guess BS really is the only thing I learned in the past 4 years of university eh. Especially with criminology, where there is no rights and no wrongs, as we are only arguing for or against a theory of our choice and every theory has its flaws and what not right? So there really isn't a right or wrong answer to criminology.
Well, I did once argue that an integrated theory of rational choice theory (Clarke, 199X) and something else would produce an ultimate strong theory that no others can argue against to... But now that I think of it, it must have been a weak argument. If it was really that strong as I have thought, then I would have been able to recall what that other theory was. Perhaps it was life trajectory theory (Moffitt et al., 1996) or Merton's (199X) anomie strain theory... Oh wellz, it's not like I'll need it for this tourism paper of mine anyway.
Oooo enough bullshitting my boredom out, time to grab some jelly and type my way through the remains of my paper! ヾ(＠°▽°＠)ﾉ
Anyway, I've written half way through my paper but I still am unsure what I'm bullshitting about. I guess BS really is the only thing I learned in the past 4 years of university eh. Especially with criminology, where there is no rights and no wrongs, as we are only arguing for or against a theory of our choice and every theory has its flaws and what not right? So there really isn't a right or wrong answer to criminology.
Well, I did once argue that an integrated theory of rational choice theory (Clarke, 199X) and something else would produce an ultimate strong theory that no others can argue against to... But now that I think of it, it must have been a weak argument. If it was really that strong as I have thought, then I would have been able to recall what that other theory was. Perhaps it was life trajectory theory (Moffitt et al., 1996) or Merton's (199X) anomie strain theory... Oh wellz, it's not like I'll need it for this tourism paper of mine anyway.
Oooo enough bullshitting my boredom out, time to grab some jelly and type my way through the remains of my paper! ヾ(＠°▽°＠)ﾉ