Sino-Russian alliance should be cautious. UK and the US may start a less hostile approach to China and Russia but, at the same time, will try to sever the relations between China and Russia. China and Russia should maintain and solidify their unity even more.
1. Boris Johnson's resignation and Wang-Blinken talk
In early July, UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson was forced to resign because of the revolt of the cabinet members whom he himself appointed.
Boris Johnson was instrumental to expand NATO eastward so that Russia would be provoked. When the Ukraine War broke out, UK was spearheading weapon supply to Ukraine.
However, after 4 months, Russia is now in full control of Luhansk region in Ukraine. Russian ruble is stronger than when the war began. Russian oil & gas revenues are at all-time highs.
Apparently, European rich people and big businesses are not satisfied with the performance of Boris Johnson. So, they mobilized the cabinet members. Boris Johnson was fired.
Currently, the next leader of the Conservative Party who will succeed Boris Johnson as UK Prime Minister is being selected.
Boris Johnson's hardline approach against Sino-Russian alliance has failed. So, UK under a new leader may take a less hostile approach to China and Russia.
But, the less hostile approach would be only surface because it is likely that, at the same time, UK will try to sever the relations between China and Russia. Sino-Russian alliance should be cautious. China and Russia should maintain and solidify their unity even more.
On July 10th, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken held talks covering Ukraine war and trade.
Realizing the strength of Sino-Russian alliance
The US too may change their strategy. The US may take a less hostile approach to China. For example. the US may gradually reduce tariffs against Chinese goods under the guise and excuse of the necessity to calm down inflation in the US.
But, the less hostile approach would be only surface because it is likely that, at the same time, the US will try to sever the relations between China and Russia. Sino-Russian alliance should be cautious. China and Russia should maintain and solidify their unity even more.
2. "Divide and rule" is US & UK's maxim
Looking back the era of the Cold War, one of the decisive factors that enabled the West to win the Cold War was that they succeeded in severing China from the Soviet Union.
In 1969, the Soviet Union and China had a border dispute. The seven-month military conflict between the Soviet Union and China resulted in the Sino-Soviet split.
After that, US President Richard Nixon visited China in 1972. The US approached China and succeeded in establishing friendly relations with China.
On the other hand, the Soviet Union started a war in Afghanistan in 1979. The US supplied weapons to Afghan guerillas to make the Soviet Union into a military quagmire, which led to the beginning of decline and collapse of the Soviet Union.
Thus, it is likely that the US and UK will try to do the same thing, doing everything to sever China from Russia.
The US and UK may keep existing hostile policies against Russia. But, the US and UK may take a lenient approach toward China so that the differentiated approach would cause a crack between China and Russia.
"Divide and rule (divide et impera)" is the Roman maxim that the US and UK has repeatedly been using.
Sino-Russian alliance should be cautious. China and Russia should maintain and solidify their unity even more.
Also, the US and UK will try to find and intensify a difference within the Communist Party of China (CPC) so that the CPC would have a intraparty conflict.
Back in 1980s, Japanese economy grew rapidly and threatened the US economic dominance. In those days, Japan's strength stemmed from the unity of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), the bureaucrats and industries.
Thus, the US decided to divide the LDP which has been a ruling party in Japan for decades. The large number of LDP members of the parliament left the party and formed several new parties.
Finally, opposition parties merged into the Democratic Party (DPJ) and, in 2009, a change of the government happened. Under the new DPJ government, the power and privileges of bureaucrats were deprived.
Without the protection of the LDP and the bureaucrats, Japanese industries lost their edge. Some companies went bankrupted. Some companies were taken over by US companies. Japan went into a long depression.
US strategy of "Divide and rule" against Japan worked.
The US would try to do the same thing toward China.
For example, the US may try to find and intensify a difference within CPC such as between a market-oriented-faction and a state-oriented-faction.
China should maintain and solidify the unity of CPC because that is the fundamental source of power of China.
Furthermore, the US would try to sever the unity between the CPC and Chinese people.
The CPC should solidify the unity with Chinese people.
3. Cooperation solidifies Sino-Russian alliance and BRICS plus's unity
In order to solidify the unity, Sino-Russian alliance, together with BRICS plus, should continue offensive operations toward the West.
In late June, Argentina and Iran applied for BRICS membership.
So, BRICS plus can support Argentina's sovereignty claim over Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas) where UK maintain its colony.
Also, BRICS plus can support Maldives' claim over Diego Garcia where UK provides an area for a US military base.
Iran proposed a new currency to be used among BRICS plus, which will undermine the US Dollar dominance.
Nicaragua has authorized Russian troops, planes and ships to deploy to Nicaragua for the purposes of training, law enforcement or emergency response.
China may obtain the same authorization from Nicaragua.
Russian warships can stay in Nicaragua's ports on the side of the Caribbean Sea. Chinese warships may stay in Nicaragua's ports on the side of the Pacific Ocean.
Sino-Russian alliance, together with BRICS plus can solidify the unity through cooperating in diplomacy, military and economy, which will firmly establish the multipolar world and serve the benefit of the mankind.
Thank you.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect nor represent the policy or position of any government, party, or organization.
1. Boris Johnson's resignation and Wang-Blinken talk
In early July, UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson was forced to resign because of the revolt of the cabinet members whom he himself appointed.
Boris Johnson was instrumental to expand NATO eastward so that Russia would be provoked. When the Ukraine War broke out, UK was spearheading weapon supply to Ukraine.
However, after 4 months, Russia is now in full control of Luhansk region in Ukraine. Russian ruble is stronger than when the war began. Russian oil & gas revenues are at all-time highs.
Apparently, European rich people and big businesses are not satisfied with the performance of Boris Johnson. So, they mobilized the cabinet members. Boris Johnson was fired.
Currently, the next leader of the Conservative Party who will succeed Boris Johnson as UK Prime Minister is being selected.
Boris Johnson's hardline approach against Sino-Russian alliance has failed. So, UK under a new leader may take a less hostile approach to China and Russia.
But, the less hostile approach would be only surface because it is likely that, at the same time, UK will try to sever the relations between China and Russia. Sino-Russian alliance should be cautious. China and Russia should maintain and solidify their unity even more.
On July 10th, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken held talks covering Ukraine war and trade.
Realizing the strength of Sino-Russian alliance
The US too may change their strategy. The US may take a less hostile approach to China. For example. the US may gradually reduce tariffs against Chinese goods under the guise and excuse of the necessity to calm down inflation in the US.
But, the less hostile approach would be only surface because it is likely that, at the same time, the US will try to sever the relations between China and Russia. Sino-Russian alliance should be cautious. China and Russia should maintain and solidify their unity even more.
2. "Divide and rule" is US & UK's maxim
Looking back the era of the Cold War, one of the decisive factors that enabled the West to win the Cold War was that they succeeded in severing China from the Soviet Union.
In 1969, the Soviet Union and China had a border dispute. The seven-month military conflict between the Soviet Union and China resulted in the Sino-Soviet split.
After that, US President Richard Nixon visited China in 1972. The US approached China and succeeded in establishing friendly relations with China.
On the other hand, the Soviet Union started a war in Afghanistan in 1979. The US supplied weapons to Afghan guerillas to make the Soviet Union into a military quagmire, which led to the beginning of decline and collapse of the Soviet Union.
Thus, it is likely that the US and UK will try to do the same thing, doing everything to sever China from Russia.
The US and UK may keep existing hostile policies against Russia. But, the US and UK may take a lenient approach toward China so that the differentiated approach would cause a crack between China and Russia.
"Divide and rule (divide et impera)" is the Roman maxim that the US and UK has repeatedly been using.
Sino-Russian alliance should be cautious. China and Russia should maintain and solidify their unity even more.
Also, the US and UK will try to find and intensify a difference within the Communist Party of China (CPC) so that the CPC would have a intraparty conflict.
Back in 1980s, Japanese economy grew rapidly and threatened the US economic dominance. In those days, Japan's strength stemmed from the unity of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), the bureaucrats and industries.
Thus, the US decided to divide the LDP which has been a ruling party in Japan for decades. The large number of LDP members of the parliament left the party and formed several new parties.
Finally, opposition parties merged into the Democratic Party (DPJ) and, in 2009, a change of the government happened. Under the new DPJ government, the power and privileges of bureaucrats were deprived.
Without the protection of the LDP and the bureaucrats, Japanese industries lost their edge. Some companies went bankrupted. Some companies were taken over by US companies. Japan went into a long depression.
US strategy of "Divide and rule" against Japan worked.
The US would try to do the same thing toward China.
For example, the US may try to find and intensify a difference within CPC such as between a market-oriented-faction and a state-oriented-faction.
China should maintain and solidify the unity of CPC because that is the fundamental source of power of China.
Furthermore, the US would try to sever the unity between the CPC and Chinese people.
The CPC should solidify the unity with Chinese people.
3. Cooperation solidifies Sino-Russian alliance and BRICS plus's unity
In order to solidify the unity, Sino-Russian alliance, together with BRICS plus, should continue offensive operations toward the West.
In late June, Argentina and Iran applied for BRICS membership.
So, BRICS plus can support Argentina's sovereignty claim over Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas) where UK maintain its colony.
Also, BRICS plus can support Maldives' claim over Diego Garcia where UK provides an area for a US military base.
Iran proposed a new currency to be used among BRICS plus, which will undermine the US Dollar dominance.
Nicaragua has authorized Russian troops, planes and ships to deploy to Nicaragua for the purposes of training, law enforcement or emergency response.
China may obtain the same authorization from Nicaragua.
Russian warships can stay in Nicaragua's ports on the side of the Caribbean Sea. Chinese warships may stay in Nicaragua's ports on the side of the Pacific Ocean.
Sino-Russian alliance, together with BRICS plus can solidify the unity through cooperating in diplomacy, military and economy, which will firmly establish the multipolar world and serve the benefit of the mankind.
Thank you.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect nor represent the policy or position of any government, party, or organization.