宇賀克也教授自身による自らの著作の説明を、日本語バージョンと英語バージョンを比較して味わい、宇賀構文に慣れ親しみ、行政法で法律英語を学びつつ、ついでに4つの代表的な機械翻訳の比較もする欲張り企画その4の5。
●04-2-1-J. Original text in Japanese
本書で取り上げた事件は、いずれも最高裁の判決または決定が出されたものであるが、最高裁判例を理解するためには、事実関係、1審判決、控訴審判決を理解することが前提となり、また、補足意見、意見、反対意見が付されている場合には、法廷意見の理解を深めるために、それらの意見も十分に検討することが必要になる。
●04-2-1-E. Original text in Japanese
All of the judicial precedents presented in the book were decided or upheld by the Supreme Court. Understanding of judicial precedents of the Supreme Court assumes an understanding of the facts of the case, the decisions of the First Instance courts, and the decisions of the appeals courts. In cases where concurring or dissenting opinions are attached, it is necessary to sufficiently examine these opinions to deepen understanding of the court’s opinions.
○04-2-1-G. Translation by Google Translation
All of the cases taken up in this book have been decided or decided by the Supreme Court, but in order to understand the Supreme Court case, it is premised on understanding the facts, one trial decision, and the appeal decision. In addition, if supplementary opinions, opinions, or dissenting opinions are attached, it is necessary to thoroughly consider those opinions in order to deepen the understanding of the court opinion.
○04-2-1-D. Translation by DeepL
All of the cases discussed in this book were decided or decided by the Supreme Court, and in order to understand Supreme Court precedents, it is a prerequisite to understand the facts, first instance decisions, and appellate court decisions, and when supplemental opinions, opinions, or dissenting opinions are attached, in order to better understand the court opinions, those opinions must also be fully considered.
○04-2-1-T. Translation by @TexTra
All of the cases discussed in this book are based on judgments or decisions of the Supreme Court. In order to understand the precedents of the Supreme Court, it is necessary to understand facts, judgments of the first instance, and judgments of the second instance. When supplementary opinions, opinions, and dissenting opinions are attached, it is necessary to sufficiently examine those opinions in order to deepen understanding of the opinions of the court.
○04-2-1-M. Translation by Microsoft Translator
Although all of the cases discussed in this book have been issued by the Supreme Court, understanding Supreme Court precedents requires an understanding of the facts, first-instance rulings, and appellate court rulings, and if supplemental opinions, opinions, or dissenting opinions are attached, it is necessary to thoroughly consider those opinions in order to deepen the understanding of the court's opinions.
