Undervalued, 'co-founder'! ?text / @ Guoying Zhe Miranda (i horse columnist) Recently, some of my friends experienced entrepreneurs career dilemma, and they play a role of a common - co-founder. They almost added simultaneously with the founder of the company, more or less out of the capital, bear similar risks with other people share and pay a fraction of the low, a series persist for several years, including several even to pay even more than the founder of the nominal time with energy, but until one day the situation is stronger than people, they finally realize that they have been stuck on the extreme or suddenly have to face falling out of choice, it is estimated that some can deal fails righteousness in, and some, to put it bluntly point is to a falling out. Let me start from the two cases VIII. X students born well after graduate schools joined a now very well-known Internet companies, as a very early employees, she followed all the way to grow the company until the company listed in the United States, and later followed the original company of their leader out of business, responsible for wireless product, its project was also a certain period of time favorite, but this time she was 24,5 years. But a year later, due to the serious differences with the founder on the product direction and corporate values, she left the company. Can not long before she met were 1.0 times the corporate executives of a well-known entrepreneur + double aura of 'big brother', a person must be born in the wilderness, with X classmates bold personality hit it off, so only took 5 points shares Miss X began helping 'big brother' to take the saddle before the horse team, make products even get financing, market development, she is very familiar with these things, but in fact closer to the role of an angel investor, not the founder who 'Gangster 'In addition to the company invested money and introduced its first outside investor, contribution to the company's major disservice. Until the company picked up slightly, chiefs began to deeper involvement, X classmates found him both management concept or product, market philosophy can not dialogue. L is not the company's number two man, after being off the board CEO is chairman of 'elimination of dissidents.' He served in the company for seven years, is a leader in the direct core business, laid more than half of the first three years without a salary, took 10,000 yuan a month later not to pay, his hand has been only option, no shares. He said he was forced to come out alone now, to know they are not entrepreneurial dream, but a career or life itself, he would not take a dream 'eight or ten years,' the to flicker others, to make sure they co-founder has a realistic look forward to. Of course, Tell me what these two in my chronological narrative, will be able to find themselves in the respective period of business experience have a significant mishap. For example, X students encounter the 'big brother' when the decision was too hasty, failed to make full communication on company goals and personal values, after the start a business, do not recognize in fact he is the founder of a real sense, from a the shares began to take a serious shortage, so when it came to product strategy, team expansion and other major decisions do not have enough clout to implement their own ideas; and L may be idealized underestimate their factor mixed with his final financial freedom as the goal, perennial endured is unfair distribution of benefits on their own, but unfortunately became a victim of factional fighting company, was suddenly awakened from reality. The two friends have high position in the company, they are in that situation, but tend to spread a bunch of people. They are able to work independently of talent, why are so stuck? Miranda felt at the beginning of the Air Jordan 18 creation of a company, the relationship between the two treatment most likely planted the seeds of good, one is the founder and angel investors relationship, and the other is the relationship between the founders and co-founder. However, in our entrepreneurial culture, and always has a kind of co-founder and insufficient attention 2015 Latest Nike Shoes to the atmosphere, over time, co-founder also have some tendency to belittle the number. In most cases, investors tend to require the company to have a stake greater than 70% of the core founder, this is because it relates to investment in human security issues, reflected in two aspects - the founder has more than investment people a greater incentive to avoid failure, success, and if the company out of trouble, you can immediately find an employer who must be responsible, and will not fall into wrangling. Therefore, investors often bet on a man instead of a team (regardless of how they say the mouth). Investors do excusable, but the objective does cause a lot of unfair, because most people will unintentionally cause asymmetric information, we disagree not thinking of how to scientifically divide responsibilities, establish an efficient The decision-making mechanism and rapid trial and error method, but directly 'mouthpiece', further fueling public opinion, the whole market is filled with a strong flavor of personal heroism, but because the interests of the company and co-founder of too little, gradually began They see themselves as ready to walk away a senior employee. In contrast Silicon Valley such a mature business environment inside, startup founder shares divided mainly based or funded ratio (assuming several founders joined the company full-time, then), the simplest and most effective, people have nothing Nike Air Max 2011 to say. A circle of friends once told me the story they formed the core of the team, the core team of 4 people, the initial investment ratio divided by two shares, A round before joining the company's other two co-founders of the company have to put money, but also with the current round of investors into the same price, and now Jordan Fight Club '91 they are the team stable, energetic, have been developing very well, the story is worth a single write, so here is which company will not name a. In fact, he said so much, in the end was a 'consciousness' of the problem. Recent movies have very fire department, right, it is that called 'China partners', although a variety of hypocritical, but the film is at least one thing I really like, that is two important co-pilot was given a new dream enough attention. Wang Yang Li film by mouth say, 'Do not start and the best friends,' then there is the other common saying, 'Do not unfamiliar business together', 'Do not own too much like business people together '' Do not, and the idea of special and more people to join this venture, 'Do not do ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ not to Miranda students Gulou shallow knowledge, the extent of these claims fly just like' Scorpio and Virgo can Air Nike Air Presto Mens Jordan 6 Rings not be together. ' almost. Who with entrepreneurship itself is a subjective thing should, after all, few people can come together, Air Jordan 4 is the other side's ability to recognize each other, but also recognize it in the direction we need to do, just do this when in fact the company's goals and do not conflict with the fundamental values of life, other things, from the road is long Come, devil knows what will happen, everything is probability, think too much futility. And if you are about to become a co-founder or co-founder, is now able to grasp just want to know what he wants, the cost of their choice clear ?? more wordy sentence, Miranda students think, in fact all The cost to the last is the opportunity cost. Do not you see whether the former Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, co-founder or Ried Hoffman is it? For your consideration .-------------------------- ---------------- article sent free Matrix Partners analyst @ Guoying Zhe Miranda and media workersim Tintin safeguard women's micro-channel public account 'TMT soy sauce', micro letter ID: tmtpassingby recommended micro-channel attention! This article has authorized account issuedi horse exclusive reprint.