The Far East Military Tribunal is a farce that camouflages the inhumanity of the U.S. military.
In postwar Japan, I feel that the word "humanitarian and humanitarian" tends to be used frequently in politics, education, and the world of mass garbage. (View of remoteness) It is important to be human, "humanitarian and humane", so there is no point in complaining, but it is strange at the same time that the image of "former Japanese army = inhumane, American (reenthenza) army = humanitarian (liberation army)" continues because "Japan (army) bad historical view" was imprinted by the Far Eastern military trial and ghq's occupation policy.
First of all, it is often talked about the Attack on Pearl Harbor by the Japanese Navy, but even if it is a trick (although it is natural because it is a surprise attack), it is only the U.S. Navy that the Japanese attack corps attacked, and it did not attack the general Hawaiian citizen and the city.
There has been no case of the Japanese army targeting civilians in the field and attacking the army or the navy.
On the other hand, what about the U.S. military? Whether it's air raids on Major Cities such as Tokyo or the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki they are deliberately attacking them knowing that there are no other people living there. Moreover, it is an inhumane weapon named the atomic bomb for Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Furthermore, why should only Japanese military personnel and politicians be tried as criminals?
There must have been people who deserved the politician and the serviceman who planned and ordered the inhumane attack on general people only on the United States side. In such an eye, I think the Japanese should realize that the Far Eastern Military Trial was a farce to camouflage the inhumane war behavior of such American forces. I can't do it in today's history textbooks.
I think this is something that will be improved if we do a little right education. It is a textbook written with the wrong historical view for more than 70 years, and it is necessary to improve "Japan bad historical view" intentionally imprinted by the teacher of the left-hand winding as soon as possible.
It is undersity if it learns the fight of the Japanese army and the United States army a little.
It seems that the trial redo seems to be popular in the world. Japan also pays a lot of money, so why don't you take it to the "United Nations ○○ Court" and file a lawsuit even if you redo the Far East military trial? A dream that never comes true. Hawkeye Hirata
