Jobs: After the first technology products, this mistake I made all of you are more thanauthor John Gruber, Apple experts. As contained in his personal blog. 1997 WWDC (Worldwide Developers Conference, Apple's global R \u0026 D Conference) conference, Steve Jobs returned to Apple also did not take long, he held an open question and answer part (see video). This is a great Nike Basketball initiative, Jobs demonstrated impromptu speech in terms of talent. More importantly, Steve Jobs clearly explains his philosophy and strategy, correct prediction everything under his leadership Apple will experience, including today, how companies need to be maintained. In short, Steve Jobs's charm: an open, honest and full of foresight, where daylight. I want to Tucao today that, Google started to make me think of the last century, before the acquisition of NeXT Apple 1990s - the new product promotion is always exaggerated - it reminds me of Steve Jobs Q \u0026 A session that meeting, a fragment. The following is this 5-minute video. The first is a participant dissatisfaction with Apple to stop development of the document editor OpenDoc, and ask tough questions. Participants said: 'This is very sad, ah, you discuss to discuss, you simply can not know more than you did a stupid thing!' Jobs for the insult laugh, he explained that he had no doubt OpenDoc does contain some great The technology nike dunk heels - which can be done other technologies can not do. However, as just such a product is not enough. Then he said: I always believe that we must first start from the customer experience, and then go back to consider the technical feasibility. Not simply to study Nike Pepper Shoes art and then consider what products it can be used, and what a way to sell it. I made this mistake may have more than anyone else present. Vivid scar. Obviously, NeXT is his greatest scars. It has amazing technology - the debut in 1988 of the operating system and development framework, today has almost become the basis for all Apple products. But NeXT never put this technology into a successful product. If you do not take into account products, new technology is an empty shell. This is Steve Jobs cut a pure R \u0026 D department - cutting-edge technology division (Advanced Technology Group) - reasons. But ATG had not throw away all the work undertaken, but the transition from technology-driven product-led. Proceeding from the product go back to the technical implementation, which became a significant difference between Apple and other companies practices in the world. Xerox's PARC research center has never launched a successful product. AT \u0026 T's Bell Laboratories created Unix, but never so to develop a best-selling product. Microsoft, Intel, IBM, Google and many other companies in the research and development costs are more than Apple. The Wall Street Journal has reported that between 2004 to 2007, Nokia's R \u0026 D expenses for Apple's 9 times (22.2 billion US dollars vs. 25 billion dollars). This difference caused some people have Air Jordan 14 Retro such a conclusion: Apple scrimp on Air Jordan 6 research and development. I think not, it does illustrate Apple focused than its rivals. What is the focus? We return to the WWDC Steve Jobs moment of the podium 17 years ago. That is the answer to the first question: 'OpenDoc exactly how?' When. Jobs said: OpenDoc exactly how? It how? [Everyone laughs] It's dead, right? Simply put, that's it. I know some of you have spent a lot of time in this lousy product on top. I apologize. I understand your frustrations. But I must say, the apple these years have been forced by poor project management. Nike Shoes Engineers like 18 different directions towards the respective efforts, while each individual point of view is an interesting direction. We have excellent engineers, but there are bad management. Like a lot of farm animals, but the animals run away in different directions, it seems not as good as total fact so much. 1 + 1 \u003c2. Therefore, we have to decide what is the fundamental way forward? What is significant? There are many things that are not meaningful. They may be microscopic meaningful macro they are pointless. Moreover, the hardest thing is you want to say ...... focus, right? You might think, 'Well, that is focused yes'. No, focus means many things to say No. You have to keep saying No, No, No, and you offend people. Apple kept saying No, No, No. Because of this, they will Air Jordan Others continue to offend people. [This compilation from: daringfireball.net]