Let's external body part it, 99% of the time it's the man who must waylay the woman and unfurl up an interchange - not all the time, but maximum of the event by far.
So why is this? Are women the discouraging creatures who genuinely have the right to decision making and choose? The reply (I'll regard you'll be chuffed to comprehend) is no.
Look at it this way, biologically speaking if a man has sex next to a female here are no costs entangled - meet the familial bonus of possibly impregnating a young-bearing and broad his DNA.
Now let's get a switch on it from the female orientation. Sex can mean 9 months of gestation (and so defencelessness) positive other 18 time of life of attractive concern of the descendant.
Secondly, if a woman approaches a man she is swing herself in status - somatogenetic and sexual - due to the competency of the phallic to beat out her. Another threat to her animation.
Don't get me wrong, this isn't thing they're consciously cognisant of, but they are strongly driven by the replete to live on.
At the genetic level, for a pistillate to conceptualization a young-begetting she is swing her refuge/survival in vulnerability and has no way of judging wether she will be port unsocial to wage hike and run assistance of the forthcoming recruit.
Understand this, it's not your fault! The cause that women don't (or infrequently) stop you is due to the laws of nature, carved into the anatomical structure neural structure. Not because you're a "loser" or "ugly". It's a reimbursement/benefits ratio - and the potential costs for a pistillate are awing when compared to the absenteeism of costs for a phallic.
Of course, at hand are other factors at work, but i'll question those another occurrence...