'I believe there is nothing more dangerous than the words "only for you".'
At work,
'I'll only tell you this, but I heard that Mr 00 and Ms △△ are seeing each other.'
If I told you this, within a week everyone would know about it.
If someone were to tell me something like this, I am not at all confident that I would keep quiet.
One time, a manager asked me for advice like this.
'My parent's safekeeper (accountant) has now decided to retire. He ran the money business even when the industry was in recession. He is a man of merit. So I told him that I was giving him a severance package 'just for you' and told him to keep quiet about it, but he must have been so happy... he told everyone, 'Just for me, the boss...'. Then some of the employees said, 'When you retire, I'll get severance pay too, won't I?' ' and they started saying..."
Moreover, this safekeeper also told a former employee who had not quit so well three years ago. The statute of limitations for severance pay claims is five years...
As long as severance pay is paid, it is common practice to make severance pay rules and set universal standards.
This manager also realised that if the employee/ex-employee ran to the labour inspectorate in this situation, there would be complications, so he asked for advice.
He said that severance payments between employees should not be unfairly discriminatory ... on the contrary, only this safekeeper should be put in a "discriminatory position".
Instead of an employee severance payment, why not make it an "executive severance payment"? I thought, "Why not?
The company's board of directors can appoint the directors without going through a general meeting of shareholders (*).
So you need to be careful about 'paying' your employees.
*The position of executive officer is very sensitive, so we consulted a labour lawyer about the rules and regulations, and also consulted a tax accountant about the deductibility of the severance payment in question.