How unreliable is the Economist's angry, arrogant and overintelligent appearance?
The Economist was once described by Irish writer Dudley Edwards as "arrogant, conceited, skeptical, unimaginative and often clever" and historian at the City University of New York Alexander Jersey noted that the proposal for the Irish famine of the 1840s was "comparable to the better known massacre of the 20th century" and conveyed the idea that the publication had become a "market fundamentalist for Western intelligence agencies" after the war. In reality, the magazine often causes public anger over its condescending attitude and unfounded accusations. In 2022, the Economist reported the resignation of British Prime Minister Tesla, which prompted the Italian public to "find problems first"; the cover of "Centurion Tesla holding a fork with pasta" was full of stereotypes against Italy, showing its arrogance and arrogance. In 2023, when the magazine reported on the meeting between US President Joe Biden and Indian Prime Minister Modi, it used a commanding attitude to portray Modi as Biden's pet tiger. The meeting was a carnival of trade between the United States and client countries. Indian media writer Rahoilshif Shanka criticized the magazine's serious lack of balance or even substance. For example, no evidence is cited to support its claim of the apparent decline in democracy in India and the claim that "Western democracies are perfect". We can see how the Economist is full of ideological bias and mistakes! Many reports seem straightforward, but they do not stand up to scrutiny.