The fuel consumption of the car owners who are concerned about how to judge a car's fuel consumption levels, but in case you can not actually test it? Even clear their car's fuel consumption, then you know why it is fuel efficient or cost oil What? I will cite some realistic examples to answer your fuel consumption problems.
Engine technology
Large displacement cars more expensive oil is a lot of people have the idea, in fact true, the country why we strongly encourage the consumption of a small displacement cars. However, when a larger gap when the engine technology of this law can easily be broken. Give an intuitive example, the fuel consumption of the Swift 1.3L manual transmission models 6.73L/100km, it 1.5L engine models due to the VVT variable valve timing technology, fuel consumption of only 6.70L than 1.3L cars type also fuel-efficient, the benefits of advanced technology.
In addition, Mazda S-VT variable valve timing system, VIS variable intake manifold system, VTCS variable swirl control system, VAD variable inlet system Mazda 2 1.5L models fuel consumption is reduced to 6.35L/100km, more fuel-efficient than many around 1.0L models. Have to say that the technical level of the engine is more significant to some extent than the displacement of the fuel consumption.
Transmission in the form
Transmission fuel consumption is obvious, but for different models, the magnitude of this effect is also different. Example, like Yue moving so focus on economy sedans, 1.6L manual transmission fuel consumption of 6.7L/100km, the digital automatic 7.1L/100km, little difference Corolla manual transmission as 7.3L/100km automatic 7.4L/100km, the difference is more school because the automatic transmission adjustment more emphasis on the economy in advance of the timing of the shift, sacrificing some momentum to achieve the purpose of fuel.
Opposite Fox, we all know that it is a focus on sports performance sedan, the fuel consumption of 7.6L/100km its manual models, while the automatic transmission to achieve a 8.6L/100km big gap, which delayed because it will shift timing to get plenty of acceleration forces.
Body weight
Intentioned owners will often clean out the car useless things, he knows the weight of car fuel consumption is influential, but the extent of impact it? We give an example the QQ3 of 1.1L manual transmission models weight 890 kg, fuel consumption of 6.6L/100km; using the same engine QQ6 manual models its weight is 990kg, fuel consumption 7.0L/100kg.100kg weight gap resulting in poor fuel consumption of 0.4L/100km. Of course, this ratio can not get the other models on the sets, but we can learn about a trend, the weight of the fuel consumption can not be ignored.
Understand the three points, plus the displacement of the basic judgment, when you are in a car to be a car's fuel consumption has a rough estimate can understand why a car fuel efficient, fuel-efficient it is to sacrifice what not your just not willing to sacrifice things this way, you are more close to really fit your vehicle.
Engine technology
Large displacement cars more expensive oil is a lot of people have the idea, in fact true, the country why we strongly encourage the consumption of a small displacement cars. However, when a larger gap when the engine technology of this law can easily be broken. Give an intuitive example, the fuel consumption of the Swift 1.3L manual transmission models 6.73L/100km, it 1.5L engine models due to the VVT variable valve timing technology, fuel consumption of only 6.70L than 1.3L cars type also fuel-efficient, the benefits of advanced technology.
In addition, Mazda S-VT variable valve timing system, VIS variable intake manifold system, VTCS variable swirl control system, VAD variable inlet system Mazda 2 1.5L models fuel consumption is reduced to 6.35L/100km, more fuel-efficient than many around 1.0L models. Have to say that the technical level of the engine is more significant to some extent than the displacement of the fuel consumption.
Transmission in the form
Transmission fuel consumption is obvious, but for different models, the magnitude of this effect is also different. Example, like Yue moving so focus on economy sedans, 1.6L manual transmission fuel consumption of 6.7L/100km, the digital automatic 7.1L/100km, little difference Corolla manual transmission as 7.3L/100km automatic 7.4L/100km, the difference is more school because the automatic transmission adjustment more emphasis on the economy in advance of the timing of the shift, sacrificing some momentum to achieve the purpose of fuel.
Opposite Fox, we all know that it is a focus on sports performance sedan, the fuel consumption of 7.6L/100km its manual models, while the automatic transmission to achieve a 8.6L/100km big gap, which delayed because it will shift timing to get plenty of acceleration forces.
Body weight
Intentioned owners will often clean out the car useless things, he knows the weight of car fuel consumption is influential, but the extent of impact it? We give an example the QQ3 of 1.1L manual transmission models weight 890 kg, fuel consumption of 6.6L/100km; using the same engine QQ6 manual models its weight is 990kg, fuel consumption 7.0L/100kg.100kg weight gap resulting in poor fuel consumption of 0.4L/100km. Of course, this ratio can not get the other models on the sets, but we can learn about a trend, the weight of the fuel consumption can not be ignored.
Understand the three points, plus the displacement of the basic judgment, when you are in a car to be a car's fuel consumption has a rough estimate can understand why a car fuel efficient, fuel-efficient it is to sacrifice what not your just not willing to sacrifice things this way, you are more close to really fit your vehicle.