Byline: Dr Mark Dooley
STUPID isnt a strong enoughwordforit.Iam talking of the fatuous utterancesmadebythe unfortunatelynamedJan Younghusband . Miss YounghusbandisexecutiveproducerofthefilmHunger,which wasscreenedattheCannesFilm Festivallastweek.It focuses on the final six weeks in the life of IRA terrorist Bobby Sands.
AndwhatexactlydidMissYounghus-band say that was so offensive to my poor, tenderears?Well,foronething,itisbad enoughthatsheandthefilmsdirector SteveMcQueen,decidedtoaddtheir vapid voices to the already-bloated Bobby Sandstributebrigade.Itisbadenough that this pair of avant-garde artistes would riskopeningtheoldboilsofhateinthe North just to satisfy their puffed-up egos. Butnothingcanexcuseormitigatethe rationale for the movie, as outlined by Ms Younghusband at Cannes.
Colorado-RockiesHunger, she intoned, tries to explore the mentality of those who seeself-sacrifice as a legitimate tool to secure their aims, such asthe7/7suicidebombers.Youlookat suicidebombers,shecontinued,and wonder what it is that drives them to kill themselvesintheirattempttomakethe world better. This is a very contemporary issue, destroying your body forsomething you believe in.Had she stopped there, I could possibly have dismissed her comments as theusual postmodern prattling you expect from the loonyluvviesatCannes.Butshedidnt stopthere.Ohno,MissYounghusband wasonaroll,mostlikelyintoxicatedby thesightofsomanylargemicrophones beingshovedinthedirectionofheroral cavity.ResemblingJimmyCarteron hashish,shestaredatthegatheringand piouslyexclaimed:Welookatterrorists andwethink:Arenttheyhorrible,they areblowingusup.Butwehavetoask: What is our role in that? We are not without responsibility. Wheretobegin?Whatdoyouactually say to a woman who thinks that the Maze Prison was a forerunner of AbuGhraib and Guantanamo Bay? How do you respond to people who believe that thebody as site of political warfare, is becoming a more familiar phenomenon. Itis the final act of desperation;your own body is
your last resource for protest?
Inanidealworld,oneinwhichImade the law, you would say absolutely nothing. Instead, you would have themsummarily sentencedforcrimesagainstcommon sense.Alas,themethodsoftheautocrat are not available to ed hardy me. I am but a lowly columnist constrained by thedecencies of democracy. And so I cannot condemn the likes of Miss Younghusbandto the fate she certainly deserves. Rather, I must take the muchmoretediousrouteofexplaining why I think such people are, to put it most politely, dangerous anddelusional. So here goes.
No, Miss Younghusband, you do not look at suicide bombers and wonder what it isthat drives them to kill themselves in their attempt to make the world better.The last time I checked, the principal objective of the suicide bomber is toblow to smithereensasmanybystandersashe can. The last thing on his mind is making theworldbetter,unlessyoubelievefear, terrorand blood-drenched streets is a panacea for global unhappiness.
And no, destroying your body for something you believe in is not a contemporaryissue.ItwasusedtoassassinateCzar Alexander II of Russia in 1881, and again bytheJapanesekamikazepilotsduring theSecondWorldWar,beforebeing adopted as a weapon of choice by the IraniansduringtheIran-Iraqconflictinthe 1980s.Buthereisthething:nomatter where or when it is used, suicide bombing is the most craven anddisgusting form of warfareimaginable,andanyonewho thinks it is either noble or politically expedient needs some serious help.
Soyes,MissYounghusband,terrorists are horrible, and they carry all responsib
Other articles:
http://www.92luyi.cn/Blog/View/?1797
http://www.bloglunivers.net/blog.php?user=tenly¬e=317970