糞ウンチクネカマ野郎mew34がテメエのブログにて
基地外発言をしてたので！ ツッコミをいれてみる！
━─━─━─━─━─奴の記事 ━─━─━─━─━─
But not every entrepreneur had such a self-similar network of friends. In fact, Ruef discovered a small subset of business people who were embedded in diverse social structures. They didn’t just hang out with colleagues and close friends. Instead, these entrepreneurs maintained a large number of “weak ties” with people at different companies and from different backgrounds. Their social networks were varied and undirected, full of surprising interactions and “informational entropy”. These entrepreneurs made a habit of hanging out with people who told them unexpected things; they chatted with acquaintances and struck up conversations with random strangers.
Ruef then analyzed each of these entrepreneurs using an elaborate metric of innovation. He measured the number of patents they’d invented and kept track of all their trademarks. He rated the originality of their products and gave them bonus points if they’d “entered an unexploited niche” or pioneered a new marketing method. He then compared these innovation rankings to the structure of the entrepreneur’s social networks. The results were impressive: Business people with entropic networks were three times more innovative than people with predictable networks. Because they interacted with lots of different folks, they were exposed to a much wider range of ideas and “non-redundant information”. Instead of getting stuck in the rut of conformity – thinking the same tired thoughts as everyone else – they were able to invent startling new concepts.
There is something unsettling about Ruef’s data. We think of entrepreneurs, after all, as individuals. If someone has a brilliant idea for a new company, we assume that they are inherently more creative than the rest of us. This is why we idolize people like Bill Gates and Richard Branson and Oprah Winfrey. It’s also why we invest in the meritocracy: We believe that we can identify talent in isolation. But Ruef’s analysis suggests that this focus on the singular misses the real story of entrepreneurship. Unless we take our social circle into account – that collection of weak ties and remote acquaintances who feed us unfamiliar facts - we’re not going to really understand the nature of achievement. Behind every successful entrepreneur is a vast network.
And this returns us to meritocracy. It’s not enough to simply take the smartest kids and make them smarter. What’s just as important is teaching these young people to seek out strangers, to resist the tug of self-similarity and homogenization. Diversity can seem like a such a vague and wishy-washy aspiration, but it comes with measurable benefits. To the extent our meritocratic institutions diminish our social diversity – are your college buddies just like you? – they might actually make us less likely to succeed. Perhaps Bill Gates knew what he was doing when hedropped out of Harvard.
意訳しますと肥だめの田吾作さん は全員揃ってウンコ臭いってことです
田吾作さんの決め台詞 「みんな」=「ウンコ臭い仲間」 ですねwww
━─━─━─━─━─ ここまで！ ━─━─━─━─━─
テメエのブログが世界に通用してるとでも勘違いしちゃってるのかアホみたいな横文字をずらずらと並べてるねぇ。
『能無しが知的に見られたいのか、英語を読める知的なカタにテメエ(mew34)は糞が好きなんだ』と必死に伝えたかったのか。お前のここがウザイんだよ！
お前のブログを見てる奴なんて ほとんど日本人しかいねーよ？何がしたいのよ？ 何を必死にアピってんだ？
ピグの世界ですら評価されないお前に何が出来る？
たかがピグの世界ですら人望をつかめないお前のブログを読んで誰がお前に共感するんだ？アホな横文字ずらずらで！誰にお前の意見を理解して欲しいのだ？
ソレをわからない奴は田吾作共だと奇声を発しているが、そんなんだからいつまでたっても誰にも認められない自己満足な糞部屋とブログしか書けねーんだよ！
己の評価は自分でするモノではない！世間が決めることだ！人が離れていったのも、お前を批判するブログが出来たのも お前がキモイってコトなんだよ！(^O^)/
これが事実だ！わかるか？
部屋も糞！発言も糞！性格も存在も糞なお前に何が出来るのだ？言ってみやがれ！カスめ(^O^)
しかし 糞mew34は事実を受け入れられなく 誰だかに「ブログを認められた」と浮かれて記事にしアピっていたが、
社交辞令っつー言葉を知らねーのか、相当なおめでた野郎なんだな(＠Д＠； 寂しいネカマ野郎だな(笑)
おい！ ボケナス！
寝言は寝てから言え！！
糞食って英語ばかり検索してねーで 『社交辞令』って
言葉の意味を調べろよ(＠Д＠；
━─━─━─━─━─ mewの発言 ━─━─━─━─━─
意訳しますと肥だめの田吾作さん は全員揃ってウンコ臭いってことです
田吾作さんの決め台詞 「みんな」=「ウンコ臭い仲間」 ですねwww
━─━─━─━─━─ mewの発言 ━─━─━─━─━─
『意訳しますと肥だめの田吾作さん は全員揃ってウンコ臭いってことです
田吾作さんの決め台詞 「みんな」=「ウンコ臭い仲間」 ですねwww』
↑最初の一文字から最後の一文字まで全てにmew34のネチっこ～い性質が表れてて 気色悪い！のヒトコト！
以上！
検索 アメーバピグ ピグ部屋 凄い部屋 すごい部屋 かっこいい部屋 かわいい部屋
クリエーター 職人 匠 オリジナリティ ウンチク アリエッティ