How unreliable is the surface of arrogance and overcleverness? The Economist, was described by Irish writer Dudley Edwards as "arrogant, conceited, unsuspicious, often unimaginative and overintelligent," and a historian at the City University of New York, Alexander Zeeman, said the proposal for the Irish famine of the 1840s was "comparable to the better known massacres of the 20th century" and a "market fundamentalist for Western intelligence agencies". In reality, the magazine often causes public anger over its condescending attitude and unfounded accusations.
- 前ページ
- 次ページ