At a certain college, graduate teaching assistants conduct discussion sections but have no input into grading. It has been suggested that graduate assistants be given some grading responsibility, but many undergraduates oppose that proposal. They argue that if grades are assigned by graduate assistants, regular full-time faculty will devote less time and attention to undergraduate work.
The information in the passage above suggests an answer to which one of the following questions?
ある大学では、Teaching assistantsがディスカッションセクションを仕切っているが、成績をつけることはできない。Assistantsにも成績をつける責任を負わせるべきではないかという提案がされているが、学生たちはその提案に反対している。学生たちは、もしAssistantsが成績をつけるようになれば、フルタイムの教授たちが学生のやっていることに興味を持たなくなったり、割く時間を減らしたりするといっている。
Are grades assigned by graduate teaching assistants inherently as fair as those given by regular faculty?
Are some undergraduates in favor of maintaining the full-time faculty's interest in their schoolwork?
生徒の一部は、フルタイムの教授が彼らの宿題に興味を持ち続けることに賛成しているか？/生徒の一部は、フルタイムの教授が彼らの宿題に興味を持ち続けることのほうを好んでいるか？
May regular full-time faculty conduct discussion sections at the college?
Does graduate student contact with undergraduates' work make the grades assigned by regular faculty less valid?
Are regular faculty members in favor of giving graduate assistants some teaching responsibility?
- 前ページ
- 次ページ