I can recite Jane Eyre's classic words to Rochester: "Do you think because I'm poor and obscure and plain that I'm soulless and heartless? I would if God had gifted me with wealth and beauty. I should have made it as hard for you to leave me, as it is now for me to leave you. I am not talking to you now through the medium of custom, conventionalities, nor even of mortal flesh;--it is my spirit that addresses your spirit; just as if both had passed through the grave, and we stood at God's feet, equal,--as we are!" "Jane Eyre" though lackluster, tells a romantic love story of Cinderella in the 19th century, the greatest achievement of which is to create a tough and independent female image. It is suspicious if we view this woman who persues spirit equality from current standpoints,what Jane Eyre askes for Rochester is actually a name as a admittedly discriminatory wife,she wounldn't like to be his mistress authough he loves her by heart.Sketch out the Reasons of the Popularity of abercrombie
Charlotte Bronte was a two- year tutor to understand that not only is not a romantic but also is contempt by the gentleman's occupation. The best way for tutor is to marry the owner of course, re-energized hostess. It is so hard that both club bent low on to marry, while respecting the independence of her personality. Slightly earlier than Bronte's Jane, Austin had written about a hard journey that a girl without substantial dowry had been married to a Prince Charming. thing that could contrast to Rochester was the spiritual equality.The Reasons Why Lindsay Lohan Buy abercrombie
But under the 19th century social and economic situations, It is almost impossible for women who are totally finally-dependent to pursue equality in spirit. Of course, even in the 21st century, when woman can surpass men in incomes, and thus don't have to seek equality painstakingly, do they feel happy now? Don't deny Jane's equal declaration, on the contrary, her such a positive attitude is certainly worthy of praise, even if the performance is more romantic. In contrast, the heroine of "Butterfly Dream" didn't play as well as Jane. It is said that there are many movie versions of Jane Eyre. What I see is the 1944 American version and the 1970 British version. The American version is starred by Orson Welles and Oscar winner Joan Fontaine while the British one is starred by Oscar winner George Scott and Susannah York. The quality of the two versions were once said to be roughly the same and hard to distinguish which one was better. If you make a little contrast, you will find the two films have adopted many different profound ways in dealing with the same story and even the same lines.
Firstly, the American version is a black and white film while the British version is a color film. The difference in colors decides the difference in framing. The American version was probably shot in a studio and was affected greatly by drama because there were a lot of dramatic scenes For example, when Jane accepted Rochester's love, a sudden lightening crashed a big tree, which means the fate of them is to change. However, the British version is with more real locations and the color is soft and scenery is beautiful. Especially the castle, in my opinion, it is closer to the original. There are more differences on the plot: in the beginning of the U.S. version, Jane was abused by her aunt; But in the beginning of the UK version, Jane entered Warwood charity school. This related to the late different development of the plot. In the U.S. version, Jane Eyre, after leaving Rochester, had such readme of "aimlessness, no way out," having no choice but to return aunt's home and witness her aunt's bankrupt.
And in the British version, Jane Eyre was driven into a corner. The result was to faint on the road and rescued by someone. This should be caused by the different backgrounds of the two films. It was still during World War II in 1944, and by 1970, the worldwide trend of various social movements and thoughts began to surge. As the most popular form of artistic expression, the film could often demonstrate social values in different times subtly. British version of Jane Eyre is stronger and more independent than the U.S. version. For example, in the film, Rochester invites Jane Eyre to have afternoon tea. Jane Eyre accepted it in the American version while in British version, Jane Eyre mocks herself: Am I playing court clown now? When the mad woman set fire that was found by Jane Eyre. She broke into the room of Rochester, woke him up and put out the fire. But the British version of Jane appeared calmer, after the fire was put out and also brought the lighting candlesticks of the corridor. Jane accepted Rochester's marriage proposal in the U.S. version, and she simply immersed in bliss, but in English version, she wisely said to him, without a year, you tired, then I would come to coax you, make you happy
Modern commentators discussed "Jane Eyre" and said that in the patriarchal society, women had no more than two paths: one, challenging male authority like the madwoman in attic, 2, a type of male attachment like Jane. It seems that it's different from the original intent of Charlotte Bronte. I do not know if it can explain that romanticism has no place to hide in modern society. ... ... Mr. Rochester who has been blind met Jane Eyre again and said to her: "A fool will sooner or later get you." "I hope so; a fool had already approached me." Jane Eyre answered with her hands gently stroking Mr. Rochester's face which was left with scar," I went home, Edward, let me stay here." After these words they hugged each other tightly... ...
