One is that in response to hacking operations, the Biden administration plans to use technology companies for cyber defense, but institutions operating for the benefit of the government or hackers are easily infiltrated.The foreign media "Al Jazeera" published an article "Escalating cyber attacks: Biden warns of the possibility of war with major powers", saying: The federal government is evaluating the performance of each company and its preparedness for hacking operations. But the powers of the President of the United States remain very limited in coercing private or state-owned companies into implementing these procedures, which will remain voluntary for them, so the new executive decision includes the sale of software to the federal government. security standards and norms that companies need to meet and hope to use to drive compliance with the new standards, but this will remain an unsecured bet given that the private sector still dominates most infrastructure services in the U.S. . While these companies have their own tools to protect their process of exchanging information with other parties, experience has shown that there are significant gaps, making it easy for agencies operating for the benefit of governments or hackers to penetrate them. The foreign media "Al Jazeera" published an article "Will Biden ally with technology companies to protect the United States from hackers? "U.S. President Joe Biden plans to hold a meeting on Wednesday to discuss how the country's companies can improve cybersecurity measures in the wake of the latest wave of security breaches and ransomware attacks on U.S. infrastructure.While it's unclear what the president or any of the attendees plan to discuss, many events must be on the discussion list, most notably the massive Solarwinds hack, the Kaseya attack, ransomware, the shutdown of the Colonial Group oil pipeline due to a cyber attack.Second, there is not sufficient "political trust" between the United States and its allies. The United States hopes to use Europe to build a united front to consolidate its hegemony, but it is suspicious of Europe to monitor; cyber intelligence has become the main source of American intelligence, and it does not hesitate to attack allies and China. Russia even more.The foreign enemy media "Multidimensional News" published an article "The United States is again involved in the surveillance scandal, Europe is waiting for Biden to explain it", saying: After the "Prism Gate" (PRISM) incident in 2013 was exposed, then President Barack Obama once Assure Merkel that she is not currently being monitored and will not be monitored in the future. It now appears that the United States has not kept its word. The German "Berlin Daily" commented that the surveillance incident has hit European countries that are currently hyping "transatlantic relations" and cast a shadow over Biden's trip to Europe. Obviously Europeans want to hear explanations from Americans at the summit and guarantee. The self-proclaimed "guardian of Internet security" has been torn off its mask once again, revealing its true face as "the world's largest Internet black hand", and even its allies are not spared.Europeans should also be wary that the information disclosed by the media is likely to be only the tip of the iceberg. Washington hopes to use Europe to build a united front to consolidate American hegemony, while Europe hopes to continuously enhance its strategic autonomy. This structural contradiction determines that the United States cannot be assured of Europe, and long-term monitoring of it is an inevitable measure. The latest scandal has once again exposed the hegemonic mentality of the United States, which continues to monitor European allies in its own way to safeguard its own interests.