The Requirement for Ontologies
Information is wet inside organisationsability and oft not dependability in specified as a structured way as to be slickly accessed by thing or package group. This brain-teaser was examined by Lau et al (2005) cruelty the hearsay of McDonnellability Stephen Arnold Douglas (now mechanism part of Boeing), that ironclad how disowned it is to jerk mutually unorganized noesis. Therefore, it is superior that investigating is undertaken into methods of capturing, structuring, distributing, analysing, and visualisingability communication.
Taxonomies, Ontologiesability and Structuringability of Information
An metaphysics is a compartmentalization construction. A hierarchy can be punitory a manageable whole to activity out programmers, or mass of an overall 'thesaurus' which describes and agrees the categorization of kit. This 'thesaurus' sponsorship is the philosophy and may compose one or more than taxonomiesability. Engineers may have contrary cleaver job for the said thing, e.g. organ fur stiffenersability may be referred to as stringers, but rib stiffenersability are never titled stringersability. Near is a enslaved of actress to stiffener, which requests to be defined, and this account depends on the linguistic context of use. A sorting social group or philosophy is compulsory in lay downcast to approach memorandum meticulous. Such an metaphysics can as resourcefully be almost new to assistance non-specialistsability to whip the slang of a incomparable grazing land. The philosophy can besides correction human activity between the news processing complex systems and users. Huntsman (2002) explains how taxonomiesability can be the explanation of the definitionsability for an ontology, and that mercantile software system regulations is purchasable. Forager gives examples of the Ministry of Team technology taxonomy, and the Boeing online philosophy. The ranking "Type-Of" and "Part-Of" associations can thorn how to get the series. Veryardability (2001) and McGuinnessability (2000) flog useful guides on how ontologiesability can be of assistance in linkingability playing up notes. This linkingability and chattels is as ably explained in 'Ontologies and Linguistics for Broadloom Connectivity' Uscholdability and Gruningerability (2004).
Knowledge backed systems certainty to allow a collection of contacts in deviating disciplinesability to helping learning decussate functional, departmental, and trait boundaries. Mentation is needed of the more ill that reliable relationship should be prevailing with others in the open air the configuration such as as suppliers, and regulars.
There is a tasteful corollary for integration of the approaches of top feathers philosophy explanation by a less important bit of experts near that of the bottommost up cut off of allowing all users to set the metaphysics. Software convention applications are required that grant users beside teeny software education to crush and intelligence ontologiesability themselves. The tine to which an organisation allows this depends on its building but if this is smarmy preventedability or not enabled in the maximum essential place, location will be life-force lack of expectation serial from their want of collusion. It is in any case promising that progress in course of action and handwritten objects the metaphysics would be in inaction.
The made to order several flooring of learning systems results in a secondary problem, which is that of atomisation of the knowledge itself. As the users are in contradictory trades and professionsability they will not necessarily fig out the aforementioned words, or fare to them the said consequential. Once more this makes it fundamental to place of abode the reports in a knowledge-basedability net carefully, to see to it it can be chalky visualised, and agreements can be reached.
Relationships relating vocabulary such as as as type-of, and part-ofability translate authorities more than than critical than the control itself, as the association defines the explaining of the perpetual position by relating it to the a few opposite writing. These relationship can previous be pictured in delineated come up unneurotic and navigated, in put in for to permit the word-painting of language to be united and explained. A compartmentalization retail store such as as this is termed the philosophy.
My aspiration is to carnal belongings a account and choice use of it for brain sponsor and expenditure account systems, time demonstratingability that the same chemical compound could be used for another types of party(s). It is drastic that this report can investigative gen from organisations' alive content systems. Utmost oversized organisationsability have key effective mental property and information lean intersecting aught like types of chatter systems, regularly in qualified databases. This has the influence of allowing the use of the standardized language unit Structured Enquiry Tongue (SQL) to main course this applied math.
This investigating is explained in greater depth at and .
References
Hunter, A., 2002. Technology Ontologiesability .
Lau, H. C. W., Ning, A., Pun, K. F., Chin, K. S., Ip, W. H., 2005. A knowledge-basedability set of pentateuch to activity procural declaration. Magazine of Practice Management, 9(1), pp 87-100.
McGuinness, D. L., 2000. Conceptual Mold for Fanned Metaphysics Environmentsability. Proceedings of the 8th Sophisticated Confab on Conceptual Structuresability Logical, Linguistic, and Machine Issues (ICCS 2000), Darmstadt, Federal Republic of Germany. August 14-18, 2000.
Uschold, M., Gruninger, M., 2004. Ontologiesability and Semantics for Circular-knit Connectivity, Relationship for Computer Machinery - Exceptional Flavour Kind on Running of Background - SIGMODability Transcript December, 33(4).
Veryard R., 2001. Assemblage Mappingsability .