ハンス・ロスリング：地球規模の人口増加について

ＴＥＤのホームページへはをクリックしてください。

直接ここ

で観ることもできます。
Hans Rosling: Global population growth, box by box

小さいことは気にすんなッ、主題と主張をつかもう！
ハンス・ロスリングさんのホームページ GAPMINDER はこちら
→ http://www.gapminder.org/

【話題】 人口増加と持続可能な世界

【時間】１０分４秒

【要約】

１．世界の人口の過去・現在・未来について語ろう

２．過去（1960年）＝30億人

　先進国10億人、途上国20億人

　大きな格差（健康、教育、家族、憧れ）

３．現在（2010年）＝70億人

　もはや「西欧諸国」「途上国」という分類は古い

　人口は２倍以上に

　先進国10億人は飛行機に乗りはじめる

　中国の10億人は自動車に乗りはじめる

　最も貧しい20億人の経済状況は変わらず

　途上国30億人は自転車やバイクに乗りはじめる

　新しい４つの分類

４．未来（2050年）＝90億人

　中国の10億人は「飛行機に乗る人々」に加わる

　「自転車」から「電気自動車」へ

　ただしグリーンエネルギーが発展し電気が安価であればの話

　最も貧しい人々

　20億人から40億人へ

　もし貧困から抜け出し、生活が改善され、幼児生存率が高まれば、
　人口増加の歯止めがかかる

　食べ物や履物に困る人々が存在する限り人口増加は止まらない

５．過去から現在までを映像で見る

　●＝国

　●の大きさ＝人口の大きさ

　色＝大陸

　縦軸＝女性一人あたりの子供の数

　横軸＝幼児の生存率

　途上国の多くが西欧諸国に追いついている

　それでもまだ20億人は取り残されている

　幼児生存率を高めることが人口増加の歯止めになる

６．実現できるか

　感情的にならず科学的に行動すれば実現できる

　　・エコ技術革新

　　・貧困を減らす投資

　　・世界の協調

７．西欧諸国は「牽引役」ではなく「お手本」である

【語彙】

IKEA ：スウェーデン発祥の世界最大の家具販売店

aspiration ：憧れ、願望

enormous ：とても大きな

mindset ：固定された考え方・見方、先入観？

linguistically ：言語として、言語的に

overdue ：期限切れ

upgrade ：グレードアップ、向上させる

taxonomy ：分類

staggering ：圧倒するような、驚くほどの

acquire ：獲得する

Geely ：吉利汽車（中国の自動車会社）

tragedy ：悲劇

hygiene ：衛生

vaccination ：予防接種

optimist ：楽観主義者

pessimist ：悲観主義者

alleviate ：軽減する

foundation ：土台、お手本？

【transcripts】

I still remember the day in school when our teacher told us that the world population had become three billion people, and that was in 1960. I'm going to talk now about how world population has changed from that year and into the future, but I will not use digital technology, as I've done during my first five TEDTalks. Instead, I have progressed, and I am, today, launching a brand new analog teaching technology that I picked up from IKEA: this box.

This box contains one billion people. And our teacher told us that the industrialized world, 1960, had one billion people. In the developing world, she said, they had two billion people. And they lived away then. There was a big gap between the one billion in the industrialized world and the two billion in the developing world. In the industrialized world, people were healthy, educated, rich, and they had small families. And their aspiration was to buy a car. And in 1960, all Swedes were saving to try to buy a Volvo like this. This was the economic level at which Sweden was. But in contrast to this, in the developing world, far away, the aspiration of the average family there was to have food for the day. They were saving to be able to buy a pair of shoes. There was an enormous gap in the world when I grew up. And this gap between the West and the rest has created a mindset of the world, which we still use linguistically when we talk about "the West" and "the Developing World." But the world has changed, and it's overdue to upgrade that mindset and that taxonomy of the world, and to understand it.

And that's what I'm going to show you, because since 1960 what has happened in the world up to 2010 is that a staggering four billion people have been added to the world population. Just look how many. The world population has doubled since I went to school. And of course, there's been economic growth in the West. A lot of companies have happened to grow the economy, so the Western population moved over to here. And now their aspiration is not only to have a car. Now they want to have a holiday on a very remote destination and they want to fly. So this is where they are today. And the most successful of the developing countries, they have moved on, you know, and they have become emerging economies, we call them. They are now buying cars. And what happened a month ago was that the Chinese company, Geely, they acquired the Volvo company, and then finally the Swedes understood that something big had happened in the world. (Laughter)

So there they are. And the tragedy is that the two billion over here that is struggling for food and shoes, they are still almost as poor as they were 50 years ago. The new thing is that we have the biggest pile of billions, the three billions here, which are also becoming emerging economies, because they are quite healthy, relatively well-educated, and they already also have two to three children per woman, as those [richer also] have. And their aspiration now is, of course, to buy a bicycle, and then later on they would like to have a motorbike also. But this is the world we have today, no longer any gap. But the distance from the poorest here, the very poorest, to the very richest over here is wider than ever. But there is a continuous world from walking, biking, driving, flying -- there are people on all levels, and most people tend to be somewhere in the middle. This is the new world we have today in 2010.

And what will happen in the future? Well, I'm going to project into 2050. I was in Shanghai recently, and I listened to what's happening in China, and it's pretty sure that they will catch up, just as Japan did. All the projections [say that] this one [billion] will [only] grow with one to two or three percent. [But this second] grows with seven, eight percent, and then they will end up here. They will start flying. And these lower or middle income countries, the emerging income countries, they will also forge forwards economically. And if, but only if, we invest in the right green technology -- so that we can avoid severe climate change, and energy can still be relatively cheap -- then they will move all the way up here. And they will start to buy electric cars. This is what we will find there.

So what about the poorest two billion? What about the poorest two billion here? Will they move on? Well, here population [growth] comes in because there [among emerging economies] we already have two to three children per woman, family planning is widely used, and population growth is coming to an end. Here [among the poorest], population is growing. So these [poorest] two billion will, in the next decades, increase to three billion, and they will thereafter increase to four billion. There is nothing -- but a nuclear war of a kind we've never seen -- that can stop this [growth] from happening. Because we already have this [growth] in process. But if, and only if, [the poorest] get out of poverty, they get education, they get improved child survival, they can buy a bicycle and a cell phone and come [to live] here, then population growth will stop in 2050. We cannot have people on this level looking for food and shoes because then we get continued population growth.

And let me show you why by converting back to the old-time digital technology. Here I have on the screen my country bubbles. Every bubble is a country. The size is population. The colors show the continent. The yellow on there is the Americas; dark blue is Africa; brown is Europe; green is the Middle East and this light blue is South Asia. That's India and this is China. Size is population. Here I have children per woman: two children, four children, six children, eight children -- big families, small families. The year is 1960. And down here, child survival, the percentage of children surviving childhood up to starting school: 60 percent, 70 percent, 80 percent, 90, and almost 100 percent, as we have today in the wealthiest and healthiest countries. But look, this is the world my teacher talked about in 1960: one billion Western world here -- high child-survival, small families -- and all the rest, the rainbow of developing countries, with very large families and poor child survival.

What has happened? I start the world. Here we go. Can you see, as the years pass by, child survival is increasing? They get soap, hygiene, education, vaccination, penicillin and then family planning. Family size is decreasing. [When] they get up to 90-percent child survival, then families decrease, and most of the Arab countries in the Middle East is falling down there [to small families]. Look, Bangladesh catching up with India. The whole emerging world joins the Western world with good child survival and small family size, but we still have the poorest billion. Can you see the poorest billion, those [two] boxes I had over here? They are still up here. And they still have a child survival of only 70 to 80 percent, meaning that if you have six children born, there will be at least four who survive to the next generation. And the population will double in one generation.

So the only way of really getting world population [growth] to stop is to continue to improve child survival to 90 percent. That's why investments by Gates Foundation, UNICEF and aid organizations, together with national government in the poorest countries, are so good; because they are actually helping us to reach a sustainable population size of the world. We can stop at nine billion if we do the right things. Child survival is the new green. It's only by child survival that we will stop population growth. And will it happen? Well, I'm not an optimist, neither am I a pessimist. I'm a very serious "possibilist." It's a new category where we take emotion apart, and we just work analytically with the world. It can be done. We can have a much more just world. With green technology and with investments to alleviate poverty, and global governance, the world can become like this.

And look at the position of the old West. Remember when this blue box was all alone, leading the world, living its own life. This will not happen [again]. The role of the old West in the new world is to become the foundation of the modern world -- nothing more, nothing less. But it's a very important role. Do it well and get used to it.

Thank you very much.

２００ヵ国の２００年を４分で（ＢＢＣ制作）

ハンス・ロスリング「増え続ける世界人口」