By Jeff GreenfieldI didnt vote for Barack Obama last November. I didnt vote for him in 2008, either. And I can prove it.No, nobody violated the sanctity of a voting booth. I can prove it because I didnt vote at all those years. In fact, I havent voted in any election since 1996. What began as a logistical issueI had to be in Atlanta for CNN, and neglected to ask for an absentee ballot in timebecame a deliberate decision. It became a way to distance myself, however inadequately, from choosing sides in a contest I was reporting and analyzing.Its also one way I have of answering a question posed by Margaret Sullivan, The New York Times public editora job known in other places as ombudsmanabout how much consumers are entitled to know about the viewpoints that journalists bring to their work.In Sullivans piece on Sunday, she offered . She wrote:[Rosen] believes that traditional notions about impartial reporting are fundamentally flawed. For starters, he thinks journalists should just come out and tell readers more about their beliefs: The grounds for trust are slowly shifting, he told me recently. The View from Nowhere is slowly getting harder to trust, and Heres where Im coming from is more likely to be trusted.Rosen is certainly right when it comes to opinion columnists. Theres no hidden agenda when youre reading George Will or Paul Krugman, or watching Sean Hannity or Rachel Maddow, because telling you what they believe and why is the essence of what they do.But what about a reporter or, as Ive been for 30-plus years on TV, an analystsomeone who tries to put news events in a broader context, but who is not offering conclusions about the right choice for president or the right course for policy? Dont I approach stories with a basket full of opinions, preferences, prejudices (in the non-bigoted sense)? Wouldnt it be self-delusional to think otherwise? An example from the past might shed some light on this perennial issue.In 1984 and again in 1990, I covered the campaign of North Carolina Sen. Jesse Helms, whose views on race led distinguished Washington columnist David Broder to label him The last prominent unabashed white racist politician in this country. Based on Helms historysuggesting that Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Communist, railing against Negro hoodlums during his years as a TV commentatorBroders judgment was dead-on. So what do you do if you were a reporter for ABCs Nightline, as I was? Do you offer that opinion as a conclusion? I did something else: I tried to explain why North Carolina, with its relatively progressive track record on race, repeatedly sent Helms back to the Senate. I tried to show how he managed to convince just enough voters that he was a man of conviction, willing to stand up to the elites of both parties, protecting taxpayers money, and standing up for their values.As for race, I followed the maxim of Show, dont tell. In Helmss case, that meant showing the infamous 1990 ad that had white hands crumpling a rejection letter while an announcer said, You needed that job and you were the best qualified. But they had to give it to a minority because of a racial quota. But what of my own personal views and background? Was it relevant that I had participated in the March on Washington in 1963 (and two previous, much-smaller civil rights marches)? Or that I had worked, years before those Helms pieces I did, in the Senate and on Robert Kenneys presidential campaign?Would it have been important, when I covered the impeachment of President Clinton, to know that I had voted for Ross Perot in 1996 because I didnt want Clinton to win 50 per cent of the popular vote that year? (It workedhe got 49 percent).The problem for me is that its hard to know where this approach ends. Look up a member of Congress in the Almanac of American Politics and youll find a voting record, and ideological scores from a raft of organizations left and right. Does it really make sense to attach such scores to a reporters story? What if Ive changed my mind over the years (as I have on all sorts of matters)? And how trustworthy are those ratings of journalists, given that much media criticism assumes that any critical note about a candidate or policy inevitably reveals a bias?Look, some of these questions are easy to answer. A journalist with a family or financial stake in the outcome of a controversy should either stay away from that story, or fully disclose his or her interest. The Washington Posts Ben Bradlee had it right when he said (more or less), You can get intimate with an elephant, but dont cover the circus. (Bradlee himself faced questions about how much he knew about the extra-marital affairs of his friend John Kennedy).But its rarely that easy. The one obligation any reporter has is to acknowledge his or her beliefs, and to ask, Why do the people Im covering believe otherwise? I did not have to believe in the literal truth of the Bible to cover a Southern Baptist Convention. I did not have to believe in a virtually limitless right to bear arms to cover the National Rifle Association. What I tried to do was to report as honestly as I could what they believed and why. And even as a Yahoo News columnist, with a lot more freedom to offer judgments, I try to maintain that approach.I know many of you just dont believe thats possible. But heres one of my opinions Im happy to reveal: I think youre wrong.
http://maryannmkoy.blogbaker.com/2013/01/05/downloads-the-night-of-the-tribades-e-book
http://friendfeed.com/ppmyln/ff556ea1/exclusive-desires-xxx-erotica-anal-sex
http://suzanoiap.blog.fc2.com/blog-entry-194.html
http://joellenuacob.inube.com/blog/2772056/remote-geochemical-analysis-elemental-and-mineralogical-composition-topics-in-remote-sensing-read-online/
http://ernaiy.blog.fc2.com/blog-entry-215.html
http://katherinapycndum.inube.com/blog/2772058/lee-miller-s-war-book-downloads/
http://blogs.rediff.com/olenubod/2013/01/06/sex-science-and-profits-read-online/
http://blog.yahoo.com/_MSOXKWGHNJN22Q2WGZUXQTZFYY/articles/978435
http://augustuspo.blog.free.fr/index.php?post/2013/01/05/The-city-of-Raleigh%2C-N.C.-and-vicinity-ebook
http://blogs.rediff.com/harrisonrb/2013/01/06/the-universal-12-step-program-how-to-overcome-any-addiction-and-win-ebook-downloads/
http://friendfeed.com/irpubu/5804cbf9/reprint-1972-yearbook-moore-high-school
http://blog.yahoo.com/_GB3W4AIIVEMMZ2QDGAGYPKL4PE/articles/925659
http://friendfeed.com/iooab/0810f19b/download-new-and-improved-c-4-better-than-ever
http://kellyesekos.inube.com/blog/2772059/downloads-a-tall-order-a-novel/
http://groups.diigo.com/group/rosalindomi/content/download-when-seducing-a-spy-8163051
http://groups.diigo.com/group/marjoriedapu/content/ziggurat-phoenix-poets-e-book-8163052
http://friendfeed.com/ubqbb/143d268a/maya-sites-in-belize-including-xunantunich
http://friendfeed.com/myipa/66486932/downloads-because-rain-novel