In cases when the honeymooner and participant are supplying the invitation to a wedding, the name calling of both sets of parents are simply not enclosed on the missive.
The defence that they are here in usual invitations is twofold: for Christian weddings, the bride's parents are traditionally the hosts of the wedding, a custom-built which comes from the old routine of giving their daughter into the exactness of her husband. In the Jewish tradition, both the parents of the bride and the parents of the participant are integrated in the letter as they each whip portion in the ceremony.
If you grain severely firmly that some your parents and the groom's parents should be included on the invitation, next I would declare that you go with a derivative of the usual Jewish asking expression.
This part comes up a lot, as it is oftentimes assumptive that the populace timetabled on the missive are the ones who are profitable for the wedding. This is not necessarily so.
The bride's parents or parent, commonly cause the nuptials invitations. (The discharge is Jewish weddings, for which some the bride's and groom's parents print the invitation.) In the Christian tradition, the groom's parents are not built-in on the observance missive. If the bride and groom cause the asking themselves, it is unanimously assumptive by the guests that the parents are not hosting the episode.
The items in punctuation mark are optional, depending upon your setting. If your nuptials is to lug locate in a edifice of worship, the second vein should read "honor of your presence" or "honor of your existence." (Both are correct; retributive bring to mind to carry the British orthography for the duration of the asking composition if you pick and choose "honor," i.e. "The kindness of a answer...".) If the occasion is to be command uncovered a flat of worship, consequently "pleasure of your company" is the accurate formulation.
For the juncture line, if your celebratory is at a circumstance which may be bewildering (9 o'clock, for example, could either be a morning or an eve wedding ceremony), consequently you may add the time and day of appellation.
If location is more than one position in the metropolitan in which you are to be wed near the said first name (two churches with siamese names, similar St. Anthony and St. Anthony of Padua, or two Orchard Country Clubs, for section), next it is prominent to endow a dual carriageway computer code to remove the possible event of guests inward at the improper position.
There's a common idea that the race listed on the honeymoon missive are the ones paid for the episode. However, according to good manners the bride's parents, if they are alive, e'er mental object the missive to the ceremony. That said, if you and your betrothed cognitive content the missive yourselves, it will in all likelihood be assumed by your guests that you are gainful for the hymeneals.
If you feel exceedingly securely that your parents should be down as the hosts of the reception, then that information, again, reported to severe etiquette, should appear on a apart greeting card.
Since your phraseology is far from traditional, following the strict rule prescribed for nuptial invitations seems a bit pointless, even so. Given the smaller quantity solemn timbre that you've chosen, the phraseology you have indicated seems perfectly dusty.