Posture of China which pierces harassment.
The diplomatic posture of China which pierces harassment. A Happy New YearI wish for your future being happiness.I need your help well this year also. Although it seems that excuse me Foreign Minister Chinese Oh Ki applies for telephone conference towards foreign ministers of several countries, such as Foreign Minister Lavrov of Russia, and he actually carried out on 30 or the 31st at the end of last year, for the other party, it is not felt that ill-bred. Of course, the theme of a subject for discussion is "worship to Japan's Prime Minister Abe's Yasukuni Jinja." Although this telephone conference is a true value of a Chinese diplomatic posture surely, and I hear that it asks for the sympathizer in its opinion, there is and it tries to explore a partner's expectation by that correspondence, In this case, it is worship to Prime Minister Abe's Yasukuni Jinja, and since having put emphasis most "is harassing" Prime Minister Abe, it is checking and the diplomatic posture to China in Japan. First of all, although diplomacy naturally gives top priority to the national interest of its own country, it is an ironbound rule not to choose a means for that purpose. And if a Chinese diplomatic posture does not choose this means and pulls it, I just hear that it harasses a partner country. Probably in that sense, diplomacy is not too much to say war which does not mix military power, and a Chinese diplomatic posture is that which is in the necessarily wrong thing. However, if the policy to adopt does not become correspondence of the other party with a difficult problem, in are meaningless, furthermore involving in the third country there, it is meaningless if consent of the third country is not obtained. Then, although it was China at the end of last year, and Foreign Minister Oh Ki's telephone conference, was the agreeable impression given the partner sure enough? that is, consent would be obtained, although China is completed as worship to Japan's Prime Minister Abe's Yasukuni Jinja is an act which invites a crisis to neighboring nations -- it is ., of course, Since "extension of rapid armaments" and "the advance plan to the Pacific Ocean" which China is promoting also in the partner of telephone conference recognized, how did they explain the policy of the Chinese government? It can expect making the situation in the future world confused increasingly then so that any question may not have the main point of a talk of this Foreign Minister Oh Ki to the foreign minister of a partner country and it may be admitted to him. The partner of Foreign Minister Oh Ki's telephone conference is Secretary of State American Kelly. Foreign Minister Lavrov of Russia. Yoon of South Korea, Foreign Minister. Deputy Prime Minister fan Byon Min and foreign minister of Vietnam. They are Foreign Minister German Steinmeier and a method of ths members.