Two subjects of the priviledged rights alleged by Zaitokukai, as granted to long term resident Koreans.
”Special legal rights of residence”
According to Zaitokukai, this must be an unreasonable, unfair rights with the Korean, they have no rights to stay in Japan with no term, for good.
What a book of “ネットと愛国” saying is, which was granted in 1965, to former Japanese national Koreans who lived in Japan before the imperialism was ended, means people who came from colony back then, and their direct descendants, instead of deprivation of their former nationality “Japan”, based on Special Law on Immigration Control .
The law has been revised in 1991, all of their descendants, also people who had chosen North Korean nationality, were granted the rights too.
The law says that they are not going to be expelled from Japan without severe disturving of national interest.
Author Kouichi Yasuda says, “Japan, once was their very suzerain to reign them over at that time, responsible of the peninsula's upheaval, like any other countries which had a colony back then, it has been always for Japan to take its responsibility, few exception as smuggler kind of things would be in our duty to take it too, or else our seniors should not fail the war, to manage the colony as it was.”or “There's no superiority existed in their rights, to compare with any of Japanese nationals, maybe other foreigners might or might not do, but why should ‘we', have got jealous so much? ” which address is what I much agree with.
“Primal receiving rights of welfare of public assistance”
According to Zaitokukai, long term resident Korean people are quite obvious primal subjects of the allowance, by free riding, making other un-thrived Japanese people into severe lack, sometimes even death of it.
What “ネットと愛国”saying is, based on Author Yasuda's research, through interviews with Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, or Welfare Office, there's no priority of the Korean ever found, tighten up of the allowance payment is just a phenomenon commonly seen over the entire bureau system of Japan, resonated to our declining economy.
Also he had found that the term has been just applied as it requires, no exception of priority of the Korean.
According to the Kourou-shou=Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare's amount of the allowance researched in 2011, there were 25,000 Korean families counted who delivered, among 1,497,329 families of the whole recipients, estimated almost 13% of Korean families were delivered beside 3% of Japanese ones.
The Korean families seem to get it almost 4 times more than Japanese families, which is supposed to be considered as a visible prominence of their un-thriving life style, as I addressed before.
The rate itself should not be taken as their primal or priviledged social position or class, it simply means their poverty, considered there would be many of un-pleasing influence brought by Korean identity with their lives, means being a minority makes him or her discriminated almost all the time, in almost every occasion in here, since we're living in the country very designed to do so, “un-advanced human rights nation” would be just appropriate, when we're going to call it.
addition
In our welfare system, foreigners are not entitled to plea a motion against the determination given by authority, the title every own national has, then they must put it into a direct lawsuit, or just forget it if they couldn't afford to do it.
In 2008, some long term resident Chinese woman, lived in Ooita Prefecture, had made a lawsuit for her dismissed motion of the welfare, which pointed her nationality as not being a Japanese, been denied on the first court, but confirmed on the second court Fukuoka-Kousai, the judgement called for equal rights with long term resident foreigners legitimately, with overturning the previous dicision.