政府は国際問題よりも国内問題を優先すべきか？

TOPIC

Should the government prioritize domestic issues over international issues?

Answer

 There has been a lot of debates and discussions about whether or not the government should prioritize domestic issues over international issues. Some people argue that it is difficult for the government to deal with diplomacy without smoothing things over within its country. But I believe the government should prioritize international issues for the following three reasons.

 Firstly, too much attention to domestic issues will isolate the country from the world. It will be more difficult for the government to obtain future aid from other nations. The lesser interdependence affects not only relationships with foreign countries but also economy in the country, which will lead to catastrophe of the country.

 To prioritize domestic issues over international issues make people's attention to foreign affairs lower. The narrower perspective against the world will give rise to prejudice. People should get exposure to foreign affairs to some degree to keep having well-rounded discretion.

 In addition, to keep awareness and related to international issues will lead to world peace. By making a plan of attack and tackling international issues, the nation can apply the methods and the precedent for domestic problems and even prevent occurring the same issues within the country. Both the country and subsidized countries will be developed, and the flow of interdependence will prevail.

In conclusion, for above-mentioned three reasons, to deter the isolation of the country from the world, to keep people's attention against the world issues, and the realization of world peace, I strongly believe the government should prioritize international issues over domestic issues.

犯罪者の人権に注意を向けすぎているか？

TOPIC

Is too much attention paid to the human rights of criminals?

Answer

 It is often pointed out that too much attention is paid to the human rights of criminals in spite of their viciousness. Some people argue that all the people including criminals have fundamental human rights, so governments have to put more focus on their rehabilitation to the society. But I believe there are no things that too much attention is paid to the human rights of criminals.

 Firstly, the current law system is an effective deterrence of atraucious crimes. To guarantee more attention to the human rights of criminals lead to the decrease of severity of punishments, which will give birth to another vicious criminals. Some criminals have gotten back into circulation of the society, so current attention to criminals' human rights is prudent and adequate.

 Financial burden on the governments is another important factor. Even now, financial burden to rehabilitate inmates is significant. Less attention to the human rights of criminals will lower the severity of management of them, which lead to make them difficult to be extricated from malicious behaviors, therefore, more inmates will be kept in penitentiaries.

 In addition, too much attention to the human rights of criminals bring mistakenly recurrence of crimes. Some criminals may abuse the attention and get away from penitentiary, make the public order worse. Civilians are also enforced to live without peace of mind that they are in prisons. It is too late after they commit a crime again.

 In conclusion, for above-mentioned three reasons, the effective deterrence of crimes, the financial burden on governments, and the possibility of recurrence of crimes, I strongly believe there are no things that too much attention is pained to the human rights of criminals.

犯罪者の人権に注意を向けすぎているか？

TOPIC

Is too much attention paid to the human rights of criminals?

Answer

 It is often pointed out that too much attention is paid to the human rights of criminals in spite of their viciousness. Some people argue that all the people including criminals have fundamental human rights, so governments have to put more focus on their rehabilitation to the society. But I believe there are no things that too much attention is paid to the human rights of criminals.

 Firstly, the current law system is an effective deterrence of atraucious crimes. To guarantee more attention to the human rights of criminals lead to the decrease of severity of punishments, which will give birth to another vicious criminals. Some criminals have gotten back into circulation of the society, so current attention to criminals' human rights is prudent and adequate.

 Financial burden on the governments is another important factor. Even now, financial burden to rehabilitate inmates is significant. Less attention to the human rights of criminals will lower the severity of management of them, which lead to make them difficult to be extricated from malicious behaviors. To keep inmates distance from hainous activities, current well-rounded attention to their human rights is indispensable.

 In addition, too much attention to the human rights of criminals bring mistakenly recurrence of crimes. Some criminals may abuse the attention and get away from penitentiary, make the public order worse. Civilians are also enforced to live without peace of mind that they are in prisons. It is too late after they commit a crime again.

 In conclusion, for above-mentioned three reasons, the effective deterrence of crimes, the financial burden on governments, and the possibility of recurrence of crimes, I strongly believe there are no things that too much attention is pained to the human rights of criminals.

世界の少数派の保護がもっとなされるべきか

TOPIC

Should more be done to protect minority groups around the world?

Answer

 There has been a lot of debates and discussions about whether or not more should be done to protect minority groups around the world. Some people argue that the aid for minority groups make them difficult to live without the help of aid. But I believe more should be done to save minority groups around the world.

 Firstly, there are still a lot of slaves who are in a minority group and abducted. Most of the cases, they are women. Most governments have dodged touching the topics and even have ignored them. They can't rely on law systems which cost a lot to use. To bail them out from the appalling circumstances, the nations should give a rise to their citizens' awareness.

 The existence of minority groups lead to the realization of world peace. Current globalization including minority groups will bring us broader perspective, which stems from interdipendence between countries including minority groups. The possibility for people to get across their culture is few and far between, its rarity prod people into getting to know about them. Deeper understanding and embracing of other culture lay the groundwork on world peace.

 In addition, to protect minorities has a major contributing factor in the development of medical technology. Some illnesses exists only specific areas, so their symptoms and the ways to deal with them can be observed only there. By protecting minorities, people get exposure to unfamiliar diseases in the world.

 In conclusion, for above-mentioned three reasons, to save slaves, the reaching of world peace, and the enhancement of medicine, I strongly believe more should be done to minority groups in the world.

再生可能エネルギーはいずれ化石燃料に取って代わるか

TOPIC

will renewable energy sources eventually replace fossil fuels?

Answer

 There is a growing tendency toward the alteration to renewable energy sources among the world. Some people argue that people's dependence on fossil fuel is considerable, so it takes more time than we expect. But I believe renewable energy sources eventually will replace fossil fuels for the following three reasons.

 Firstly, it must be a priority for the world to preserve the existing nature and ecosystem. People have exploited fossil fuels and the usage of them severely polluted and changed climate. We have to take responsibility for the aggravative change which enforces all flora and fauna to adapt the changes. Such efforts ensure our future world will become brighter.

 The depletion of fossil fuels is another important factor. According to some research, fossil fuels will deplete in the foreseeable future. Before they vanish into thin air, it is inevitable for us to quite using exhaustive energy and make use of the power of renewable energy such as solar heat, geothermal energy, and wind power. By perpetuating of the usage of them, we can obtain energy infinitely without exacerbating depletion.

 In addition, such activities ensue world economic growth. In some states of America, for example, there are a lot of energy charger for electric cars. Other nations have tried to produce them, some countries have even quit producing conventional gas cars. Such tendency prod companies to compete in technologies related to renewable energy, which spur world economy which stems from its business transactions.

 In conclusion, for above-mentioned three reasons, the inevitable protection of the Earth, the disappearing of fossil fuels, and the enhancement of world economy, I strongly believe renewable energy sources eventually replace fossil fuels.